Posted on 09/10/2009 7:18:19 PM PDT by khnyny
Though we live in an era when all undesirable facts are often blindly labeled "conspiracy theories" by political operatives with an agenda at risk, a very real conspiracy unfolds every now and then.
While it is indeed true that not all theories are actual conspiracies, like when Hillary Clinton developed an imaginary "right-wing conspiracy" out to get her husband, when in fact, the semen stained dress provided all the necessary (but unfriendly) facts and a perfectly logical explanation for all of those nasty rumors - it is also true that some conspiracies are much more than just crackpot theory.
To be a bonafide conspiracy, two or more individuals must knowingly conspire, plot or plan an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious act. In politics or law, an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act, is a "conspiracy." Not in theory, but in reality.
Such is the case today!
A political national committee, the Chair of the Party convention, the Secretary of the Party, Party offices in each of fifty states, and maybe many - many more, have knowingly and wantonly defrauded the American election system and more than 300 million American citizens.
They plotted and planned an act of evil, unlawful, treacherous fraud in a blind quest for unbridled political power, and they hoped that you would never catch it. They almost got away with it too...
They snuck it past fifty state election commissions, congress, the US Supreme Court and Justice Department, the Federal Elections Commission and countless members of the Electoral College nationwide. Not a single member of the, as Limbaugh says, "drive-by media" caught it either, or if they did, they decided to become complicit for their own political reasons.
(Excerpt) Read more at rightsidenews.com ...
Ping.
You know, the FR mod moved this out of front page news. Imho, this is an important story and deserves the exposure, but hey, I’m not a mod, lol.
Hmm. There was a previous post or two of these documents, but it was not entirely clear what the problem was. This analysis makes it a great deal clearer.
Also, it points out that these two different documents, one held up to public view and the other sent officially to the 50 states, were both signed and notorized by the same people.
How could that be possible without those people wondering why? Or, in fact, how could it be possible without those people KNOWING why.
This wasn’t clear to me, at least, when reading those earlier posts.
This does certainly look like deliberate fraud.
This is the crux of the apostrophé, to quote Zappa.
Win this one, and she's our Constitutional Republic again.
;-/
This is a VERY good article; thank you for posting it.
Yes, I thought the writer did a credible job of laying out the scenario too.
Both versions of the documet are singed and NOTARIZED by the same people and both documents include the same typos.
This also showed up on Canadafreepress.com today at
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14583
Interesting...
Geez, that’s “document” and “signed” - typing too fast!
As an aside, the blogger has misquoted the Democratic documents. The blogger writes "the Democrat Party", but the scanned documents have "the Democratic Party".
Does the typo ("though" instead of "through") invalidate the documents, getting the Democrats off the hook for fraud?
Has anybody asked the Democratic Party about this? Maybe Glenn Beck needs a heads up...
I’m one of those people who can’t find the obvious, what is the typo?
I’ve been on the computer too long today. I can’t for the life of me find the typo. Would somebody please point it out to me?
“August 25 though 28, 2008,...”
It should read “through” not “though”
Thanks...this makes the story I read previously much clearer. It does point to some kind of fraud at some level. I wonder who provided these forms and who passed them to them to be signed. Duplicate...not certified and sent to the states? Definitely a person to identify.
~~~Another site reporting on the Canada Free Press article.. PING!
Thank you, I swear I read it 3 times but I totally missed it, I’m afraid I might be a Dimocrat because they obviously missed it too.
Ping - A long intro, but when you get to the graphics, it really hits you in the face. Pelosi signed a falsely worded document.
legally qualified to be president
read it again
EV: Does Orly Taitz have this as part of her case?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.