Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: khnyny
It's definitely interesting that that there should be two such Democratic documents, both apparently signed on the same day. Since the signatures on the two documents are slightly different, this doesn't appear to be a case of some sort of photoshopping or copying.

As an aside, the blogger has misquoted the Democratic documents. The blogger writes "the Democrat Party", but the scanned documents have "the Democratic Party".

Does the typo ("though" instead of "through") invalidate the documents, getting the Democrats off the hook for fraud?

Has anybody asked the Democratic Party about this? Maybe Glenn Beck needs a heads up...

11 posted on 09/10/2009 7:53:35 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: snarks_when_bored
As an aside, the blogger has misquoted the Democratic documents. The blogger writes "the Democrat Party", but the scanned documents have "the Democratic Party".

That jumped out at me, too.

46 posted on 09/13/2009 1:20:28 PM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson