"We didn't land on Sherwood Forest, Sherwood Forest landed on US!"
Posted on 03/14/2009 11:16:04 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20
That's impossible. A lot of people on this very website have assured me that there are more trees now than there ever were.
It would be impossible for there to be more trees now then there ever were. So I doubt you are being accurate.
However in the United State there are a lot more trees growing now then there were in the recent past. In certain areas there are now more trees then there were anywhere from two to three hundred years ago.
Part of this is due to tree farming, part is due to trees no longer being a primary source of energy and part is due to people moving to the cities and marginal farm land returning to nature.
Your right it wouldn't make a very good book, to unbelievable. A non-american president...yeah right.
An academic says he’s found evidence that Britain’s legendary outlaw Robin Hood wasn’t as popular as folklore suggests.
Julian Luxford says a note discovered in the margins of an ancient history book contains rare criticism of the supposedly benevolent bandit.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090314/ap_on_re_eu/eu_britain_robin_hood
In addition to what Harmless Teddy Bear noted, the use of hydrocarbons in mechanized agriculture has both reduced the amount of land needed for cultivation (higher yields, and no more having to feed the muscle power that used to be used to till and harvest) despite the growth in population (if memory serves, US population has increased around fivefold since 1900). Land has gone back to the wild, and prior farmland and grazing areas turned into suburbs. Instead of 6 to 8 foot trunks on hemlocks and whatnot that used to grow in some places around here (the last of that was cut before WWI), the old timber we see today was planted along quiet village streets around a hundred years ago, usually before there were pipes in the street to worry about.
|
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks george76 for the ping and Stayat Homemother for the link in FReepmail!"Around this time, according to popular opinion, a certain outlaw named Robin Hood, with his accomplices, infested Sherwood and other law-abiding areas of England with continuous robberies," the note read when translated into English, Luxford said.Isn't that pretty much in accord with the RH story as it has come down to us? That he also robbed the filthy rich clergy? And that Friar Tuck he couldn't beat, FT couldn't prevail either, but FT joined the Merry Band? |
||
|
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
|||
nuts, and we were doing so well here...
The 13th Century manuscript that shows
Robin Hood and his Merry Men weren’t so popular after all
Daily Mail (UK) | 14th March 2009 | Paul Sims
Posted on 03/14/2009 7:48:20 AM PDT by PotatoHeadMick
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2206506/posts
Yeah, old Robin removed the gold from one and all.
I’d look further for opinion polls reflecting opinions of the very poor he was supposed to be helping before forming an attitude against Robin.
Fixed it.
You beat me to it...
The Church taxed the peasants just like the Crown. They were co-equal targets with agents of the Crown for Robin Hood.
Needless to say, certain religious Orders might have shared the Crown’s view of Robin’s actions.
I heard they found his birth certificate.
Seems he was born in Kenya. :^)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.