Posted on 11/27/2008 9:55:00 PM PST by Islaminaction
The sharia loving Iranian courts are going to punish a man in the same manner that he punished a young woman who would not marry him. He blinded her with acid and he will be getting the same treatment back. In Arabic this is known as "qisas" It is the act of retaliation.
(Excerpt) Read more at islaminaction08.blogspot.com ...
No objections, yer Honor. Carry out sentence on this scroat with my blessing.
I’m certainly no muzzie fan, but in this instance I whole heartedly agree with the decision. And cut his schlong off for good measure.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
It is hard to feel sorry for the dude.
animals breeding animals....horrific society ...
> animals breeding animals....horrific society ...
Straight out of “Heart of Darkness”. It’s the sort of thing only Joseph Conrad could dream up.
Oy! Again with the animals!
PS, bringing sharia law here, see how fast the prop 8 disappears. These people do NOT tolerate Homosexual activity. They are killed and removed from society.
Got no problem with this.
This is one of the rare times that I agree with them also.
Aside from treating women like sh*t, these guys display a tendency toward gayness which might be explained by their mother's mis-treatment of them as little boys due to a foul relationship with a husband who'd probably rather be 'out' with the boys and goats. Burkas, anyone?
First, let me say that the concept of ‘an eye for an eye’, or the synonymous ‘let the punishment fit the crime’, is not solely a muslim/sharia institution.
In many instances I would heartily support criminals receiving the same punishment they inflicted on their victims. Murderers, for example. Mutilation crimes. Crimes that permanently injure the victim. Adding on, also, compensation for the victim from the criminal.
However, it would have to be totally correct that the criminal no doubt was the person who did the crime, because such punishments are not reversible. In many cases this would not be hard to prove. In others that were circumstantial but likely, they would be sentenced appropriately as guilty and given proper jail terms and still pay compensation to the victim or victim’s family.
For example, we had a story posted here on FR about a mom who microwaved her baby daughter and she died eventually. I have no qualms about letting that monster of a woman be microwaved and dying a painful, several hours long death from it.
Works for me....
Perhaps we SHOULD consider Sharia Law.....
I think most sensible people with testicles have no problem with justice, or scum facing justice in this world, much as he will face in the next one.
Women are there only as subservent to men, to bear children and for serving their husbands. Young boys, men are there for sexual pleasure.
Ummmm, nope.
But I like "make the punishment fit the crime", as long as guilt can be unquestionably established in trial (or there's a clear, unforced confession).
"Eye for an eye" is not Islamic. It far pre-dates that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.