From an era when gay meant happy. FYI - I wonder how Glenn Sacks would feel if this court imposed a conservative agenda by judicial fiat - like ban all abortion center, banned quotas, rounded up all the illegals, etc.
So then because of other problems in marriage and family life, because there are these other issues, that means we have to allow same-sex marriage? Because we haven’t been able to solve those other problems, then we have to allow same-sex marriage?
Can same-sex marriage be defended on its own merits, or is the main argument that straight people have messed up marriage, so any fears of allowing same-sex marriage and the consequences must be groundless?
What kind of logic is this?
It’s remarkable how some people can only see an event from the perspective of how it affects THEIR issue. Glenn needs to realize that redefining marriage is an issue that destroys civilizations... not just a small percentage of families.
Ping!
It may not destroy one marriage. But it brings down an entire civilization.
This is not about discrimination. They always had the right to marry, just like all the normal people in the country. Someone of the other sex, that is.
Oh, they want to marry someone of the same sex? Sorry. That would be ridiculous.
Sacks is a pro-gay idiot.
I can’t decide if he and his fathers rights boneheads are worse than or equal to the homo perverts who want to destroy the sanctity of marriage.
Either way, I can’t stand these anti-American sentiments.
IIRC, this article is what is called “gay taqiyya”.
From an era when gay meant happy.Heh heh.
The will of the people, twarted again!