Skip to comments.
Harvard Professor Says Incomes above $4 Million Should Be Confiscated
AZCONSERVATIVE ^
| 3 Nov 2007
| John Semmens
Posted on 11/08/2007 2:28:31 PM PST by John Semmens
Writing for the magazine Foreign Policy, Harvard psychology professor, Howard Gardner, argues that no American should be allowed to earn any more than $4 million per year nor be allowed to keep more than $200 million in total wealth.
Im the smartest man in America, Gardner boasted. Why should anyone be allowed to make more than I do?
Gardner threatened to lead a secession of the intellectual professoriat if theres a Republican administration after the next election.
Gardner is the originator of the theory of multiple intelligences. In this theory, he hypothesizes that a person can be a genius along one dimension, but a moron along others. Personally demonstrating the validity of this hypothesis has reputedly placed him in line for a Nobel Prize.
(Excerpt) Read more at azconservative.org ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Education; Government; Humor
KEYWORDS: academia; itsajokepeople; nitwit; satire; socialism
To: John Semmens
Gardner is the originator of the theory of multiple intelligences. In this theory, he hypothesizes that a person can be a genius along one dimension, but a moron along others.Apparently, he himself fits into that category. This is too easy...
2
posted on
11/08/2007 2:29:41 PM PST
by
RockinRight
(Just because you're pro-life and talk about God a lot doesn't mean you're a conservative.)
To: John Semmens
Thanks for brightening a gloomy day. Heheheh.
To: John Semmens
Wouldn't this mean that Rush's show would end sometime in the middle of January?
ML/NJ
4
posted on
11/08/2007 2:34:58 PM PST
by
ml/nj
To: ml/nj
Wouldn’t this mean that Rush’s show would end sometime in the middle of January?
Guest hosts for the rest of the year while Rush plays golf.
5
posted on
11/08/2007 2:52:52 PM PST
by
Cheburashka
(Come over to the Dark Side. We have cookies.)
To: John Semmens
....and any professor, (who supports him) earning over $12,500/yr.....its' "for the Chil'ren, ya know..."
6
posted on
11/08/2007 2:55:13 PM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you....Run, Fred, Run. :^)
To: John Semmens
“...$4 million per year...”
He pulled that number out of his a** just prior to inserting his head.
To: RockinRight
This is the loon whose “multiple intelligences (sic)” theory has given rise to the educational fad called “learning styles.” Side guides (f/k/a teachers) must plan their lessons to accommodate those students who for example possess “kinesthetic intelligence” or intelligence of motion. How a chemistry teacher can implement this nonsense in his classroom is beyond me.
http://www.uwsp.edu/education/lwilson/learning/3mides.htm
8
posted on
11/08/2007 3:19:47 PM PST
by
trane250
To: trane250
Im the smartest man in America, Gardner boasted. Why should anyone be allowed to make more than I do?
Gardner threatened to lead a secession of the intellectual professoriat if theres a Republican administration after the next election.
We could only hope.
9
posted on
11/08/2007 4:20:36 PM PST
by
Chickensoup
(If it is not permitted, it is prohibited. Only the government can permit....)
To: John Semmens
Harvard Professor Says Incomes above $4 Million Should Be Confiscated Yeah!
Right on!
I don't make near that much, and I get to vote. What's to think about?
Say what?
It's right there, in the Constitution, dammit.
The gummint can tax you 100%. They have already done so in times past.
10
posted on
11/08/2007 4:50:00 PM PST
by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: John Semmens
he he he...
I love these regular satire posts...
11
posted on
11/08/2007 4:51:24 PM PST
by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
To: trane250
How about driver’s ed? Can you imagine letting a 15 year old have a DL after READING about how to drive a car? And you’re right about its pervasiveness in K12. There are schools where they test kids at the beginning of first grade, then [attempt to] teach them to read, based on their “predominant intelligence.” The irony is that even Gardner publicly admits he has no scientific proof that this works.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson