Bump for Duncan Hunter!
PING
When Duncan can get over 5%, get back to me.
If Hunter is so confident in his ability to win he should resign his House seat and campaign full-time.
Great stuff
Excellent!!
I certainly hope that this blog continues with comparisons on other issues as well. I have long felt that it is VERY important to outline the specific differences comparing Hunter with the other top tier candidates (including Fred Thompson) on border security, illegal immigration and amnesty, NAFTA, NAU/SPP, and China.
Of note in Part 1:
“Thompson’s other mistake is that he is still trying to stick with a federalist argument. Roe v. Wade was certainly a poorly reasoned decision, but it was not only bad because it usurped states rights. It had a far worse effect on the HUMAN rights of the unborn, God’s natural law. Fred does not support a constitutional amendment to overturn this abomination. Apparently he has reverence for our founding documents, or so it would seem. Yet, if you look at the above citations, it is obvious that he was more than willing to amend the constitution for things our Founding Fathers never envisioned: Term limits and a mandatory balanced budget. A man who is willing to change the constitution to tell states they must limit the terms of their representatives, yet who won’t contemplate it for something that the founders clearly would have included had it been an issue at the time – protection of the unborn – is thoroughly confused. Or in Fred’s case, thoroughly phony.”
What other issues will ‘Federalist’ Fred decide are individual state’s issues? Illegal immigration? “Aspirations of citizenship” for illegals? Would that result in sanctuary states with the Federal government off the hook for enforcing our current immigration laws?
...........”I speculate that this is one of the reasons for his delayed entry into the race; to afford him the time necessary to conjure up a believable narrative. Though it is only speculation regarding the delay, it is not speculation that he will have to address his pro-choice history once he does enter.”
Or perhaps he figures the less time to be pressed into answering, the better?
I am so thankful to have the opportunity to support Duncan Hunter!!
I’ve only heard one guy out there talking about federalism:
Fred. Which is why he is my FIRST choice.
Too bad he can't win...
(Ron) Paul introduced The Sanctity of Life Act of 2005, a bill that would have defined human life to begin at conception, and removed challenges to prohibitions on abortion from federal court jurisdiction.[88] Defining embryos and fetuses as persons would make abortion murder and outlaw fetal stem cell research and some contraception and fertility treatments
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul
In addition, Dr. Paul has gave more than 4,000 babies new lives.
Not to play the "My candidate is more pro-life than yours!" game, but the author should realize there are other candidates who are deeply pro-life too.
bfl
Ping-a-ling
Here’s a nice quote for when Duncan Hunter is in the general election against the democrats.
Rep. CHARLIE RANGEL: “No, the truth of the matter is, Duncan’s a real expert in military affairs.....”
CNN July 21, 2003
http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0307/21/se.07.html
What in the world are Hunter-ites gonna do if and when Duncan throws in the towel, and endorses Romney, or Thompson, or ..gasp... Guliani.
Move to the Libertarian Party, perhaps?
(PS: I love Duncan Hunter. I just don’t believe he has that intangible something (personality?) which is essential to winning the US Presidency.)
Link of Interest:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1437269/posts
[FLASHBACK] Ramsey Clark backs the President’s Supreme Court nominee
BMFLR, B4DH
This is great, thank you so much.
BTTT