Posted on 02/18/2007 11:15:33 AM PST by Creationist
The Theory of Evolution is a wound upon society inflicted by proclaimed erudite men. This festering wound is easily transmitted. It is spread into almost every thing children read at public school; fictional books, geography, biology ECT. ECT.. It is portrayed by Hollywood This travesty is supported by our tax dollars and is never corrected when proved wrong, it is destroying our society with its Godless belief. It will be said that they can not afford new book, well just rip out the pages that are incorrect or mark them out with a permanent marker.
This hypothesis has been proved incorrect at every turn. Even the author of the revolution or god to the hardened believer, Darwin, had doubts in his belief. Darwin expected the future to find factual evidence in support of this miraculous idea. Over 150 years later still no proof. Why in fact there is more evidence to the contrary discovered by scientist who do not accept Jesus. The mountain of evidence against the theory is so compelling, yet those who can not or will not except a Supernatural power as the Creator of it all continue to make up hypothesiss that require supernatural power to make it happen.
Evolution can not happen, changing from one species to another. They will show microevolution, really adaptation or variation as evidence. This is not so because there is not a new species, they are still roses, horses, dogs, cats, corn, ECT. ECT.. What are the supposed mechanisms of evolution; mutations and natural selection. Well natural selection can not do it and it should really be called random selection. Natural selection only selects at random, it takes intelligence to select a particular one. Random acts would almost never pick the exact correct sequence. Mathematicians will tell you random selection is chaotic and would never create intelligent organization. Mutations can not do it. Mutation are 99.9% harmful to the organism. What does not kill it or make it sterile makes it weaker and less likely to survive. If by chance it does, the DNA stasis will act upon the organism and if it has offspring they will revert back to the original within a generation or two.
The only way is for the Hopeful Monsters that Goldschmidt dreamt up. Millions of mutations happening at once about every 50,000 years, beneficial, happening to 2 males and 2 females in a close proximity each pair giving birth to the exact same kind of new species one male and one female. What that means folks is one breeding pair of lizards gave birth to a male chicken and within a mile or less another breeding pair of lizards gave birth to a female chicken, both with the right organs to breed and continue the new species. Whew! if that is not a faith based belief then what is. When is the next 50,000 years up?
Though the theory in general does not claim origins but it is in text books, Chemical evolution. Chemical evolution is a proposed process which does not exist today ( therefore it is not science and is a religious belief ) in which a reducing atmosphere ( no evidence in the rocks for this ) existed and rain fell upon rocks and created a chemical soup in our oceans. Lighting struck a puddle and life appeared with all the complexity of DNA and RNA installed. Stanley Miller performed an experiment in a controlled environment in which he created simple amino acids both D and L (left and right handed). Every type of amino acid in animals is left handed, no animal or man could live with right handed (D) in them. Every time amino acids are synthesized in a laboratory they create equal amount of left and right. If it can not be done in a controlled atmosphere with billions of dollars, how can random actions ever be expected to do it.
Evidence for evolution is just not there. The fossil record shows no evidence of transitional forms. There is nothing in the Precambrian that supports lower life forms evolving into the Cambrian Explosion. Evolutionist can not explain why there is a explosion of complex organisms in the Cambrian layer. This layer of evidence is condescending to their theory and they do not wish to acknowledge it as so. The slow processes of today could not create the sedimentary rock layers we see in the geology. The fossil layers the coal fields the sedimentary rock are all best explained by the global flood of Noahs time.
Evolution has no proof, only conjecture believed by millions. Excepted by these millions because they are told by the government funded educated people of self proclaimed expertise. As the Bible says and how the Super rich and high up government official believe we are sheep, cattle to the latter, following believing expecting our leaders to tell us and teach us the truth. This is not going to happen, there is an agenda to this theory, it is to undermine Gods authority and to make people believe they are nothing more than animals. You teach then they are animals and they will act like them just look at how much the world has changed in the past 70 or so years due to the mandated teaching of this godless theory.
Every day more is discovered and science tries to explain it with their complex naturalistic ideals that defy the laws of nature and physics. When the answer is so simple God whose name is Jesus Created it all in six literal 24 hour days, and he did not use evolution anywhere in his process.
Give one RELIABLE source that the world is over 6,000 years, let me give you a head start before you begin, dont use carbon dating and other dating methods for your proof, because they are overwhelmingly flawed and unreliable even the inventor of carbon dating freferred to it being unreliable.
If you look for the evidences that are there, that the world is around 6,000 years of age you will be astounded,
population growth ratios- man could not nor anything could not have been here for millions and billions of years, for one there would be evidence everywhere of there remains and there are none, also the population today would be astronomical, etc... etc... theres just no way man could have been here that long,
Also when you look back into ancient artifacts and civilisations the only real viable proof goes only back around 6,000 years, from Kings and archeaological and historical finds, and thats exactly the timeline of the bible around 6,000 years this is undisputable historical fact!
There are so many real visiand logical evidences to this that I cant right them all down, evolutionist offer no rweal evidences as to the earth being old except hypotheticals and the adhock.
Theres something called polystrate fossils that are tree trunks that go right through verticaly the supposed millions of billions of sediment layers, but this is what would happen if there was a world wide flood where trees were uprooted and gigantic mudslides and sediments took place, also it doesnt take millions of years to have fossils, fossilisation can occur quite quickly. So much more!!!! search for it my friend! Peace!
Im talking about all the writings as a whole my friend not just Flavious Josephus himself! Peace friend and no strife!
Look at the population grows of fruit flies - making your argument, the world can't be older than a couple of months.
Give one RELIABLE source that the world is over 6,000 years, let me give you a head start before you begin, dont use carbon dating and other dating methods for your proof, because they are overwhelmingly flawed and unreliable even the inventor of carbon dating freferred to it being unreliable.
Don't use a dating method while dating? You must be kidding!
Which writings?
Pliny the younger
Thallus
Cornelius tacitus
The perigrinus
The talmud
Seutonius
Falvious Josephus
many more look them up! Peace friend!
Who of them wrote about Jesus Christ? Who wrote about Christians only? And most of them wrote more about Caius Julius Caesar than about Jesus Christ - in contradiction to your claim: There is more historical writings of Christ than any other historical figure in all of history at the time of Christ or before. [...] More than Ceasar, Nero, etc... etc..
That ain't Barney.
What I mean by dating is carbon or potassium-argon
Humble gunner did you know they have found a leg bone to a Trex in 2005 and it still has blood in it and vessels and they are red and can be squeezed out of the soft tissues that were inside and they have found other supposed old bones with the same.
There are more historians who have wrote of Christ, than anyone figure in history.
Look up historians who wrote of Christ or something along those lines.
Cornelius Tacitus--- considered one of the most accurate historians of the ancient world, Christus from whom the name had its origins, suffered the extreme penelaty during the rein of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators Pontius Pilatus
Flavious Josephus--- Jesus was said to be the Messiah, did surprising feats and it was said he was resurected condemmed by Pilate and taught many both Jews and greeks
Thallus--- wrote of the darkness that covered over during Christs crucifixion
Phlegon---also writes of an eclipse without reason
There are more historians who have wrote of Christ, than anyone figure in history. (post #310)
There is more historical writings of Christ than any other historical figure in all of history at the time of Christ or before. Thats pretty damming to your assumptions. More than Ceasar, Nero, etc... etc... (post #268)Now, you say that Cornelius Tacitus is considered one of the most accurate historians of the ancient world, and - guess what - he wrote a great part of his annals about Nero.
I'd say your statement in post #310 is not only hyperbole but flat-out wrong. And making such a statement casts a doubt on the truth you want to herald - something Augustinus warned against in the 4th century. You really should differ between Jesus Christ as the Son of God and Jesus as a figure of history.
Humble gunner did you know they have found a leg bone to a Trex in 2005 and it still has blood in it and vessels and they are red and can be squeezed out of the soft tissues that were inside and they have found other supposed old bones with the same.That was one of the more disingenuous descriptions of Ms. Schweitzers work I had to read. "Blood in it"? "Vessels squeezed out"? Gosh! Have a look at the reality...
Fine, and what kind of dating methods would you accept?
Dating the earth by population growth seems to be quite problematic...
The conspiracy obviously got to her...
:)
Nice to meet you here, too!
By Historical means By mathmatical calculations as to when things occured, and ratios. And then use deductive reasoning. I believe it would be much more effective.
I got news for you si tacuissem, that article didnt say anything worth reading! It explained nothing! Horner even suggested to reasearchers to try and prove the objects were not blood cells, talk about disengenuous! It has been said with great confidence that it is blood components in it.
Plus they have found other bones with blood components.
and that were not fossilised this isnt the first find. Talk about disengenuous, bring out all the info if your truly trying to be honest here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.