Replies

Give one RELIABLE source that the world is over 6,000 years, let me give you a head start before you begin, dont use carbon dating and other dating methods for your proof, because they are overwhelmingly flawed and unreliable even the inventor of carbon dating freferred to it being unreliable.

If you look for the evidences that are there, that the world is around 6,000 years of age you will be astounded,

population growth ratios- man could not nor anything could not have been here for millions and billions of years, for one there would be evidence everywhere of there remains and there are none, also the population today would be astronomical, etc... etc... theres just no way man could have been here that long,

Also when you look back into ancient artifacts and civilisations the only real viable proof goes only back around 6,000 years, from Kings and archeaological and historical finds, and thats exactly the timeline of the bible around 6,000 years this is undisputable historical fact!

There are so many real visiand logical evidences to this that I cant right them all down, evolutionist offer no rweal evidences as to the earth being old except hypotheticals and the adhock.

Theres something called polystrate fossils that are tree trunks that go right through verticaly the supposed millions of billions of sediment layers, but this is what would happen if there was a world wide flood where trees were uprooted and gigantic mudslides and sediments took place, also it doesnt take millions of years to have fossils, fossilisation can occur quite quickly. So much more!!!! search for it my friend! Peace!

If you look for the evidences that are there, that the world is around 6,000 years of age you will be astounded, population growth ratios- man could not nor anything could not have been here for millions and billions of years, for one there would be evidence everywhere of there remains and there are none, also the population today would be astronomical, etc... etc... theres just no way man could have been here that long,

Look at the population grows of fruit flies - making your argument, the world can't be older than a couple of months.

Give one RELIABLE source that the world is over 6,000 years, let me give you a head start before you begin, dont use carbon dating and other dating methods for your proof, because they are overwhelmingly flawed and unreliable even the inventor of carbon dating freferred to it being unreliable.

Don't use a dating method while dating? You must be kidding!

Give one RELIABLE source that the world is over 6,000 years

That ain't Barney.