Posted on 07/10/2006 5:07:54 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
One of the basic themes of the DUmmie FUnnies is that the looniness demonstrated by the DUmmies (and the Kos KOmmies) is not an exception but the RULE among the liberals. Therefore it was no great surprise to see the bizarre RANTINGS by University of Arizona psychology professor, Deborah Frisch, against Jeff Goldstein of PROTEIN WISDOM as chronicled below by MICHELLE MALKIN. After it was discovered that the SICKO anonymous postings were made by Frisch, she resigned her post at the University of Arizona but after a lame "apology" Frisch quickly reverted back to Moonbat form. My main question is WHAT is Deborah Frisch's DUmmie screen name? After all, does her rabid rantings not sound EXACTLY what we constantly read over at the Democrat Underground? So let us now read the NUttie Professor's threats to Jeff Goldstein in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, noting that there are MANY other NUttie Professors just like her, are in the [brackets]:
"I’d like to hear more about your “tyke” by the way. Girl? Boy? Toddler? Teen? Are you still married to the woman you ephed to give birth to the tyke?
Tell all, bro!"
[This is DEBORAH FRISCH making a veiled threat against Jeff Goldstein's two-year old son. Keep in mind that this NUttie Professor teaches psychology.]
"[...] as I said elsewhere, if I woke up tomorrow and learned that someone else had shot you and your “tyke” it wouldn’t slow me down one iota. You aren’t “human” to me."
[This is a more direct threat by NUttie Proffesor, DEBORAH FRISCH, against Goldstein's son.]
" Ooh. Two year old boy. Sounds hot. You live in Colorado, I see. Hope no one Jon-Benets your baby.
Are you still married to the woman you humped to produce the toddler? "
[Yet more evidence that DEBORAH FRISCH needs to be institutionalized.]
Give your pathetic progeny (I sure hope that mofo got good genes from his mama!) a big fat tongue-filled kiss from me! LOTS AND LOTS OF SALIVA from Auntie MOONBAT, if you don’t mind!
Somehow, Jeffy boy, I think you get off on the possibility of Frenching your pathetic progeny, even if it is a boy. You seem like a VERY, VERY sick mofo to me, bro.
[Speaking of a VERY, VERY sick mofo... And now to see the the LAME APOLOGY followed by a quick backtrack by the NUttie Professor herself...]
I wrote some inflammatory comments at a blog by a guy named Jeff Goldstein called protein wisdom that infuriated many bloggers and commenters. Many of these bloggers emailed my boss at the University of Arizona to tell on me.
[Notice how DEBORAH FRISCH quickly turns it around to make HERSELF the victim. "They told on me! WAAAAAAH!!!"]
In hindsight, the things I wrote were over the line of nastiness. I apologize to Mr. Goldstein.
[Lamest apology ever. As we have seen she is already already making herself the victim.]
I have resigned from the University of Arizona so there is no need for other enraged people to write to administrators there. I am a temporary worker there and I am in Oregon for the summer.
["Please stop telling on me for threatening Jeff and his son!"]
Some blogs have posted comments that I perceive to be physically threatening. I have contacted the FBI and the Pajamas Media staff to determine how to proceed with this aspect of this unbelievable experience.
["I'm the REAL VICTIM here! I have to GALL to claim victimhood for threatening a two-year old boy!"]
My intention in this post is to de-escalate the situation. The comments that started this all were nasty, not threatening. But I feel very threatened by the response.
[Sorry, but your posts were most definitely THREATENING. Oh, and very very SICK as well.]
Jeff - I lost my job. You won. Could you call off the troops?
["Jeff - I lost my job for threatening your boy. You won. Could you please tell people not to be outraged by my sickeness?"]
UPDATE: I have been receiving emails alluding to the fact that I got fired. I was not fired. I resigned. I was not pressured to resign. I just sent my boss an email explaining what was happening and told him I thought it was best for all involved if I resigned.
["It was best for all involved if I resigned before they could fire me."]
Protein Wisdom has been down since this all started so it is not possible to see all the comments and everything that led up to this. People are posting snippets of what I posted that have been embellished with references to french kissing and other things I didn't say.
[Sorry, DEBORAH FRISCH, but your SICKO posts have already been saved so there is no convenient walking away from your own NUttiness.]
When and if protein wisdom comes on line again, it will be hard to tell what Jeff added or deleted to the transcript.
["I'm a victim! I'm being framed! WAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!!"]
I have been trying to get in touch with Pajamas Media to discuss some of my concerns about what has been published at Black Five about this issue. I feel threatened by some of the comments there.
["I feel threatened by the outrage over my threats of harm to a two-year old boy~ WAAAAHHHH!!! Pity MEEEEEEEE!!!! I'm the TRUE victim!"]
A-yup. They start with physical threats. And when they turn out to be as threatening as a sleeping paraplegic kitten, they go into victim mode. Leftists are nothing if not extremely predictable. It's not a question of "what will they try next," but rather "when will they try it next?"
Congrats! You have made the FD2003 Potential Tag List!!
?
Oooooh, FD2003 = you, potential tag list refers to your tagline. I always called them "sigs." I get it now. Smoove!
Well, thanks for being brief and pithy! :)
Check my profile -- you will see some of the good ones I have collected.
Nice. The "Ruler of Earth" quote, btw, originally came from Family Guy. What happened was, Stewie was watching TV, and Lois switched it over to the Teletubbies for him. He hated it, but couldn't turn away... finally, Peter came along and changed the channel. Stewie uttered the quote in thanks and ran off.
Yes, I should have noted it was Stewie. Funny bumper sticker!
This woman has a history of cyber stalking. There is the instance of her abusing a Professor at UCLA at www.professorbainbridge.com.
There is also, now, this question of her leaving the University of Oregon due to her not being given tenure. She claims in her post that she was sexually harassed - but then states she wasn't sure she was. Then she lays it on one professor who she claims was a real problem for her. Now knowing her penchant for stalking conservative blogs, I wonder whether this professor was a conservative and she did her act with him. He wouldn't stand for it, saw to it she didn't get tenure, and so she took her act to the Internet where she felt safer. That's all conjecture, of course, but it could have happened. In any event, this Jeff Goldstein would be well advised to look in to legal remedies. She's obviously escalated her actions and who knows what's next.
True, this is a study in political delusion gone overboard, but she isn't much different than a lot of the people we've seen at DU or KOS. To me, the thing that worries me about her is the obvious escalation and the child. Especially the child!
Speaking of danger and legal remedies, if one looks at the DoS attacks Jeff got soon afterwards could be the small door opening to investigate the home. Even if she was not responsible, the authorities could start investigating her for that and perhaps uncover other things in the process. Maybe even child abuse. Unfortunately, there isn't much one can do about cyber threats and cyber stalking, but the DoS is definately a punishable offense and is against the law.
She may have suffered punishment a bit more than she even knows at this juncture because I believe she will never teach again. This doesn't help the child living in the household though and further investigation by the authorities should be conducted.
I was reading some of the history on her too. Kcvl posted some of that over on this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1663481/posts
Some of that is quite obviously libel.
Her partner is probably in denial. People who think they're "in love" often ignore major red flags until they get hit over the head with them enough times. The more emotionally needy they are, the more likely this is to be the case.
Many of us have shared your concern. I've now come to the conclusion that it may not be warranted.
Refer to post #97, this thread. It links to a short series of these two women, Deborah Frisch and Cecile McKee shown with a dog. Judging by the appearance of the two women, these pictures were taken at an earlier date than the one you commented on.
The absence of a child in these earlier photos is interesting. If the photo with child is more recent, then one of the two would have had to have birthed that child subsequent to the earlier photos (if the child was in existence at the time of the earlier photos why wasn't she included?). The fact that they were 'partners' in both sets of photos means that one of the two admitted lesbians would have had to have birthed a child during their relationship; something not very likely IMHO.
Obviously, someone was also in the kitchen taking the photo. We don't know the provenance of the photo, but it's possible to assume that the child belongs to someone else who happened to be in the house when the kitchen photo was taken. Of course, all this is speculation, but makes as much sense as that 'young' child belonging to one of these women.
Just my two cents worth.
Maybe not very likely, but still possible with in vitro fertilization. Example: Melissa Etheridge and Julie Cypher (sp?), with David Crosby being the sperm donor.
Frisch has since claimed to have returned to (or still resides in) Eugene, OR. That makes me wonder about the relationship of these two women. Has the other woman returned to Oregon with her? Did she, too, resign her position at UofA? Do they spend summers in Oregon then return to Tucson for school season?
There's a lot here we don't know about them. However, see my recent earlier post on speculation about the child.
The link to that other thread, BTW, is...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1663481/posts?page=1,50
I understand, but the age of the child (a toddler?) makes me suspicious that it isn't theirs. If I recall correctly, the date of the kitchen photo is around 2004 (I remember that from somewhere in the other thread. It came from an Arizona newspaper article around that time. I also believe that is somewhere around the time Fritsh came to UofA.
Again, speculation on my part. I can hope, can't I?
Yep, you can hope, and so do I. Believe me, so do I.
Have you checked out her blog this morning?
Not only is she making sick comments about our troops, but she is trying to organize an email-only campaign to talk (plot?) about Jeff behind his back. She really needs to be committed. Jeff has said he doesn't think she's a threat but I think he underestimates her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.