Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OUT OF LEFT FIELD-Limbaugh, Hannity Face Armed Forces Radio Loss
Radio Equalizer ^ | 6/5/06 | Brian Maloney

Posted on 06/05/2006 8:38:16 PM PDT by finnman69

Handing liberal opponents a sudden victory in their longtime battle over Armed Forces Radio content, Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity may soon be removed from broadcast outlets serving American soldiers stationed around the world.

With last year's addition of liberal talk shows to the Armed Forces Radio and Television Service lineup, how could this happen now?

Wasn't the previous flap over such programming resolved at that point?

In this new scenario, ALL political talk shows will be nearly eliminated, including those hosted by liberals Ed Schultz and Al Franken.

If Hannity and Limbaugh aren't being singled out for quasi- cancellation, that might seem fair, but the devil is in the details.

And it's a particularly ugly devil: upon closer examination, an astounding picture of anti- conservative bias is clearly revealed. Was it intentional? We don't know.

In a highly unexpected development, a radio consulting firm hired by the military has strongly recommended dumping these programs from stations that reach the vast majority of troops and others residing overseas.

After an extensive study was conducted that included a number of focus groups, Lund Media Research determined that talk radio and country music should be largely eliminated to make room for hip-hop, rap and pop formats, according to Stars and Stripes.

Only in rare cases where three military radio frequencies are available in a region would Limbaugh and Hannity survive in any manner. Even then, only about an hour of each show would remain on the schedule of the third station, rather than their entire three- hour broadcasts.

Included on the cut list is NPR's programming, generally regarded as liberal, but it would still air for at least three hours daily.

While the military must decide whether to act on Lund's advice, if it wasn't intending to take these recommendations seriously, we find it unlikely that AFRTS would pay a significant amount of money and assist in coordinating this research.

Until now, station programming decisions have been handled locally, with area brass making the call as to what was suitable for troops stationed in a particular conflict zone or military base. Under the new proposal, that will be centralized.

Back to the key question: if both liberal and conservative programming are dealt the same blow, where's the bias?

Because conservative talkers are many times more popular with the troops than their liberal counterparts, the right will suffer greatly, while "progressives" have much less to lose. That's because very few stationed overseas are listening to the lefties.

It's in Lund's own data, reprinted here from Stars and Stripes (click on image to enlarge), proving that Limbaugh, Hannity and conservative advice host Dr. Laura are infinitely more popular than Franken and Schultz.

Based on their results, 24.9% across all age groups reported enjoying Rush Limbaugh and 13.2% also favored Sean Hannity, with Dr. Laura generating a 12.9% approval rating. Keep in mind that these are excellent numbers, far higher than the audience shares they generate at home.

When looking at those 35 and older, Rush generates a huge 35.2% figure, just behind NPR, while Hannity and Dr. Laura come in with 17.6% and 20.6%, respectively.

By comparison, Franken and Schultz fare poorly, with 6.3% and 2.2% respective overall positive ratings, according to the study. In the 35+ category, the results were similar, with a 6.7% for Stuart and just 2.8% for Big Eddie.

Even in the younger 18-34 demographic, conservative talkers clobbered their liberal counterparts.

With this kind of data, how could anyone determine that nearly all political talk radio should be eliminated from the two proposed primary worldwide broadcast stations? Why not remove the unpopular liberal shows and keep the rest?

Whether Lund was the best consulting firm to handle this assessment of worldwide AFRTS programming is unclear. If there's any agenda, it is likely pro- music in nature, as the company primarily works on that end of the business.

But with such an astounding misinterpretation of its own data, we can't rule out partisan bias.

For the left, including some Democrats in Congress, this could be Christmas in June. From here, it's up to the military to make the final call.

At least for now, however, substantial deviations from these recommended changes seem unlikely.

UPDATES: substantial trade publication coverage today. Conservative blogs were seemingly caught unaware of the impending situation.

--- Radio industry (and Vietnam) vet Mike Anderson of STLMedia talks about his own experiences with Lund Research.


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: armedforcesradio; hannity; liberaltalkradio; rush; rushlimbaugh; seanhannity; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Interesting....i'm sure we will hear more about this.
1 posted on 06/05/2006 8:38:20 PM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: finnman69

Sneaky, stab you in the back, take away the troops votes in Florida in 2000 liberal Democrats.


2 posted on 06/05/2006 8:41:19 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (Liberals saying "We Support The Troops" is like OJ looking for the real killers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69; Iam1ru1-2; Impeach98; GunnyBob; Bob J; Calpernia; bert

ping


3 posted on 06/05/2006 8:43:19 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Defend the Constitution! Represent LAWFUL Constituents! SEAL THE BORDERS NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

Let me guess liberal ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR and VOA Radio will still be offered?


4 posted on 06/05/2006 8:44:13 PM PDT by GeronL (Bush lost his mojo??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

YUP. Sneaky insane leftists


5 posted on 06/05/2006 8:44:48 PM PDT by GeronL (Bush lost his mojo??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

lovely


6 posted on 06/05/2006 8:47:07 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

this should be at least front page news


7 posted on 06/05/2006 8:47:38 PM PDT by GeronL (Bush lost his mojo??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Yes, but I'm not holding my breath. Time for the troops to make their voices heard.


8 posted on 06/05/2006 8:52:11 PM PDT by octobersky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

As long as our men and women have access to the 'net, they can still listen to Hannity, Rush, and others. The half-witted commie media still forgets that the internet trumps their attempts to deny the free-flow of information.


9 posted on 06/05/2006 8:59:04 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

The bottom line is, since no one will listen to the liberal scum, they'll punish everyone else by taking away their favorite conservatives, those who actually SUPPORT the troops. This is just another way to undermine their morale.


10 posted on 06/05/2006 8:59:15 PM PDT by Ron in Acreage (Liberal Democrats-Party before country, surrender before victory, generous with other peoples money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

That's what they get for supporting the troops and the war effort.


11 posted on 06/05/2006 9:45:10 PM PDT by Hillsdale Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps; Richard Poe; Bob J
NO, THEY HAVEN'T FORGOTTEN...

from FR's home page...

http://www.richardpoe.com/hillaryssecretwar.html
12 posted on 06/05/2006 10:02:38 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Defend the Constitution! Represent LAWFUL Constituents! SEAL THE BORDERS NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
Yup, like sneaky assassins with no honor.
13 posted on 06/05/2006 10:41:47 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
It was only a matter of time. The "Stars and Stripes" newspaper slid off to the left,a long time ago. But Armed Forces Radio, selling out to the enemy, should piss off every patriot in America. It's life blood is our tax-dollars .

Thank God our troops have access to the internet!
14 posted on 06/05/2006 10:57:41 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Dear US Senators, Reps. and Mr. President: Why are y'all abetting the destruction of our culture?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny; McGruff; Bahbah

Ping.


15 posted on 06/05/2006 11:06:18 PM PDT by Springman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
It's the "if we can't win we we'll take all of the marbles home" mentality
16 posted on 06/06/2006 6:35:29 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

Maybe our troops fighting for democracy could vote on it?


17 posted on 06/06/2006 12:38:56 PM PDT by polymuser (There is one war and one enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
Stars and Stripes appears to be written by Paul Begala and James Carvile.

How in the world did that happen?

18 posted on 06/06/2006 12:49:55 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Timesink; VPMWife78; Starman417; ajolympian2004; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; ...
FoxFan ping! (Hannity radio show)

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

19 posted on 06/06/2006 10:41:24 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; Doctor Raoul; ELS; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

20 posted on 06/06/2006 10:42:14 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson