Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maye on Death Row; Shot Police Officer breaking into daughters bedroom
The Hattiesburg American | January 23, 2004 | Hattiesburg American

Posted on 12/10/2005 6:28:19 AM PST by TennMountains

Edited on 12/11/2005 12:54:13 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

Only a link and title are allowed for any material from Gannett Publications.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: capitalpunishment; copkiller; deathrow; maye; mississippi; noknockwarrant; nostinkinwarrant; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 441-457 next last
To: Riley

So what is your theory on why Maye did not invite the cops in?


261 posted on 12/10/2005 3:15:25 PM PST by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: GregoryFul
So what is your theory on why Maye did not invite the cops in?

My theory? My understanding is that this occurred when the guy was asleep. He is awakened by someone trying to break the door in. I don't believe that this guy even knew that they were cops- witness the fact that he stops firing and disconnects from the weapon as soon as it becomes obvious that they're cops.

Besides- if he had known that they were cops, what sense would it make to shoot at them if he doesn't have drugs or other contraband in the house? He'd just be setting himself up to be screwed.

262 posted on 12/10/2005 3:29:16 PM PST by Riley ("Bother" said Pooh, as he fired the Claymores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

"I wonder if they even bothered to find out there was a kid there who would have been endangered in the raid process."

The cops need not find out whether a child is there or not when they do a bust. But I agree that the child in the premises endangered her life. The child should have never been there. Children having children is a dangerous combination.


263 posted on 12/10/2005 3:45:30 PM PST by Baraonda (Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Riley
That seems to be most plausible to me, as well. To me, Maye was clearly protecting his child and his person against an unknown assailant. It is too bad that this country has deteriorated to the extent that police are allowed to use such dangerous and obviously unconstitutional tactics to apprehend suspects, in the name of efficiency.

Think the founding fathers of this country did not appreciate the obstacles they were attempting to establish against the tyranny that so many here are willing to accept?

Each citizen is equal to a cop, a judge, a senator, the president, etc., cops do not have any right to break into a person's home, suspect or not, unless having presented a legal warrent to the suspect, he resists. Suspects are innocent until found guilty in a court of law in accordance with legal process.

How many cops get capital murder charges when they mistakenly kill someone they misapprehend as a threat? 0.

264 posted on 12/10/2005 3:45:45 PM PST by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: GregoryFul

At this point- I am interested in hearing what the other side has to say. Can't say for sure, but the blogger has indicated that he is going to be acquiring the trial transcripts. I am wondering what is in them.


265 posted on 12/10/2005 3:58:57 PM PST by Riley ("Bother" said Pooh, as he fired the Claymores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Oh, come on, how can you be suspicious of a source called The Agitator?

LOL. I am trying to be logical and not let superficial things get in the way.

266 posted on 12/10/2005 6:05:50 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (When the First Amendment was written dueling was common and legal. Think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Baraonda
The cops need not find out whether a child is there or not when they do a bust. But I agree that the child in the premises endangered her life. The child should have never been there.

Since I've not seen anything about drugs or illegal activity having actually been going on at that location (other than one anonymous informant's alleged report), it is not shown that this house was any more dangerous than your house or mine

Children having children is a dangerous combination.

I haven't seen anything in any article I've seen about the age of the mother. Where did you get that particular bit of data?

267 posted on 12/10/2005 6:08:09 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the hubris to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: md2576
Thank you.

I am using this to try to decide who is getting their facts most correct here.

It does not really matter if the kid is a boy or a girl except that getting it wrong is a major error that speaks to the accuracy of the report

268 posted on 12/10/2005 6:09:30 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (When the First Amendment was written dueling was common and legal. Think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: wildbill
My local PD did a SWAT operation at 1:15 AM. The suspects were in a trailer. The officers announced their presence, followed with a flash/bang grenade and entered the premises. The suspect was waiting with a .357mag revolver. One officer took a round through both buttocks and one in the back that left a very deep bruise. Had he not been wearing his vest, it would have gone right though his heart. The other officer was hit in the collarbone through the vest. It broke his collarbone. The officers observed the 2nd suspect, a female, and a small child in the room. They didn't return fire. The suspects escaped in a car and were apprehended the following day in another city.

The SWAT operation was an arrest warrant for both suspects in the trailer. Both were convicted felons. They now face additional charges as felons in possession of a firearm and attempted murder of two police officers.

269 posted on 12/10/2005 6:39:07 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
"And?"

Couldn't help but notice you left off the second half of the fourth amendment. From SOME of the information posted here there does seem to be SOME doubt about the warrant. Do you have knowledge about this story that the rest don't? Perhaps we may learn more about this.

"I didn't see anything about dope and cop killing."

I didn't see anyone convicted of dope either. Have you really been reading the responses to your statements?

Your Joe Friday style of one-liners seems familiar to me but I can't recall where just yet. Your ability to ruffle feathers in only a couple of months is also noted. You'll find we squabble quite a bit, since different opinions are allowed here. {some call it freedom}

270 posted on 12/10/2005 7:30:40 PM PST by labette (Opinions and Christian criticisms welcomed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: labette
Couldn't help but notice you left off the second half of the fourth amendment.

And?

I didn't see anyone convicted of dope either.

And?

271 posted on 12/10/2005 7:36:12 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
And they all lived happily ever after?
Then again, could arguing simply for the sake of argument be your only pleasure in life?
272 posted on 12/10/2005 7:47:26 PM PST by labette (Opinions and Christian criticisms welcomed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

I lived in the area at the time, I didn't just hear it through the grape vine.

Would you please eloberate on your, "Uh huh"??????


273 posted on 12/10/2005 8:50:32 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Okay, bring our troops home. But don't feign surprise when the terrorists tag along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: GregoryFul

First off, there is no reason to believe the cops ever did identified themselves. Second off, it was too damn late to start identifying themselves as they crawled through the window into the child's bedroom.


274 posted on 12/10/2005 8:55:05 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Okay, bring our troops home. But don't feign surprise when the terrorists tag along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: labette
Already posted, 229
prosecutor, Claiborne "Buddy" McDonald :
[...] There were 2 separate search warrants issued for 2 separate apartments in a wood frame duplex which were located side by side one of which was the apartment Maye was in. The warrant was not for the wrong apartment. The warrants were issued by a lawyer/city judge not a lay judge. The warrants were served at the same time by two teams. The testimony was that there were several announcements that they were the police and that they had a search warrant. The occupants in the apartment next to Maye’s allowed entry after announcement and there was no resistance. Maye did not. Porch lights were on in the front of Maye’s apartment and the uniformed officers and marked cars visible in the front yard and on the porch. The officers announced at the front door and then at the back door. The officer who killed was at the front door initially and then went around the back to the back door before entry was made. The defendant Maye testified and the jury did not believe him. You really need to get a copy of the transcript to get an understanding of the entire case. You can get it from Cecilia Fillingame the court reporter in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. If the officer had not had a valid warrant and right to be there the trial judge would not have allowed the case to go forward.

275 posted on 12/10/2005 8:56:47 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
Would you please eloberate on your, "Uh huh"??????

What was his name?

276 posted on 12/10/2005 8:57:58 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
First off, there is no reason to believe the cops ever did identified themselves.

"The testimony was that there were several announcements that they were the police and that they had a search warrant."

277 posted on 12/10/2005 8:59:08 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: Baraonda
Morover, if no drugs were found, it's possible one of the three adults had enough time to dispose of them, especially if they were hidden close to the toilet flush

Or maybe there were no drugs and the original tip was bogus. The tip was reported to the slain officer anonymously, it was not something the police developed on their own through surveillance or following leads from other cases.

My notion is that if there are so few drugs that they can be quickly flushed down the toilet, it's not worth risking the lives of the officers and possible Innocent "civilians". Just serve the warrant as they are supposed to be served, by knocking on the door and presenting the warrant to the suspect.

278 posted on 12/10/2005 9:03:11 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

I don't remember his name after all these years, and the those who turned his body into Swiss Cheese , probably don't either. You may be able to find that information , by digging into old records from the files of the Portales, New Mexico, Police department. Or from early 1980's issues of the Clovis, NM, News Journal.


279 posted on 12/10/2005 9:10:39 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Okay, bring our troops home. But don't feign surprise when the terrorists tag along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

There was no such announcement in the data, I read.


280 posted on 12/10/2005 9:14:11 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Okay, bring our troops home. But don't feign surprise when the terrorists tag along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 441-457 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson