Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUmmie FUnnies 06-03-05 ("Are we really going to let the GOP talk us into running Hillary?")
DUmmie FUnnies ^ | June 3, 2005 | DUmmies and PJ-Comix

Posted on 06/03/2005 7:16:14 AM PDT by PJ-Comix

Has Andy Stephenson entered a DUmmieland Witness Protection Program? For the past few days, ever since Andy began publicly harassing the relatives of Bev Harris by posting their names and personal information about them, Scamdy has DISAPPEARED. In fact ALL MENTION in Dummieland about Scamdy’s “pancreatic cancer” has disappeared and if any there are so bold as to post any reference to Scamdy, Skinner immediately sends it down the Memory Pitt. As to Pied Piper Pitt, following his much ballyhooed posting of documents “proving” that Scamdy did indeed have pancreatic cancer, he has retracted his head into his turtle shell and REFUSES to further comment about those documents. One big reason is that those documents Pitt posted accurately predicted in an April 27 FAX that Scamdy would have surgery during the week of May 23 even though at the time of the FAX the surgery was still scheduled for May 10 and wasn’t rescheduled until almost 2 weeks after the FAX was sent. Right now the DUmmies are hoping that the whole Andy Stephenson Situation (as Skinner called it) would just go away. Unfortunately for Dummieland, the DUmmie FUnnies will STILL shine the light on this scandal which demonstrates what a bunch of dim-witted gullible fools the DUmmies were. Until Scamdy or Skinner or Pitt makes a full public confession (or are indicted) the DUmmie FUnnies will consistently hammer the DUmmies on this subject in all future DUmmie FUnnies. This edition of the DUmmie FUnnies based on a DUmmie THREAD titled, “Are we really going to let the GOP talk us into running Hillary?” will continue smoking out the DUmmies on this point. As usual the DUmmie postings still in Scamdy Denial are in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, about to reveal some inside political info he recently received, is in the [brackets]:

Are we really going to let the GOP talk us into running Hillary?

[Consider it payback for talking us into nominating Bob Dole in 1996. Bob Dole didn’t so much run to win as to merely build up his resume. Somehow this latter seemed very important to Dole in his future career of doing Penile Erectile Dysfunction commercials on TV. At least we have no doubt that Dole suffered from this problem (no one admits to this condition unless they really had it) but we STILL don’t know what sort of medical problem Andy Stephenson had although it was almost certainly NOT pancreatic cancer.]

I think she would be an awful candidate. She's not that great a speaker, clearly not at all concerned about corporate power, posturing more and more "moderate" all of the time. The Senate alone has at least a dozen other Democrats who would make better candidates than her.

[All the more reason why Karl Rove has designated her as your ’08 nominee.]

But the GOP is licking its fetid chops, man. They can just about taste the hatefest they would enjoy if she were running. There would be no holds barred on the calumny and slander that they would rain down on her.

[Karl Rove has put out a directive to NOT accuse Hillary of faking a pancreatic cancer operation. Something like that is OFF-LIMITS.]

They are walking a fine line, though. Having demonized her for more than 10 years now, they need to talk Democrats into getting her through the primaries, so they have to cool it down a bit and talk about what a great potential candidate she would be. David Broder put up a column not too long ago just like that.

[Psst! Why do you think the Bushes and Bill Clinton are acting like buddies now? It’s all part of the Rovian Master Plan.]

But they can't stop talking about her. Both Hannity & Colmes and Bill O'Rodent had segments on her Tuesday night. What other Democratic politician gets so much attention from those loons?

[Kerry recently got a flurry of press attention when he FINALLY signed his Form 180 to release his military records to the public. Yes, he FINALLY signed Form 180 and now we are waiting for him to FINALLY drop that signed form in the mail.]

Thinking "well, if the GOP hates her so much, they must be afraid of her, therefore she would be a great candidate" is the trap the Democrats cannot, must not, walk into. Step away. This will be the most important national IQ test for the Democrats in a long time.

[I am SO CONFIDENT of the low DUmmie IQ that I can flat out state the Rovian Game Plan without the slightest fear that you DUmmies can do anything about it. Hey! If you were DUmb enough to send in your money to Andy Stephenson for a phony pancreatic cancer operation then you certainly will easily be manipulated by Karl Rove despite advance warning.]

Having said all that, I'd vote for her in a heartbeat next to any GOP candidate. But please Lahd, and all my fellow Democrats, please don't let it come to that.

[It WILL come to it. And now to announce the ULTIMATE DUmmie nightmare, DUmmie ProfessorPlum. Not only is Karl Rove saddling you with Hillary but the GOP candidate for ’08 has already been decided upon---Dick Cheney. You think that Bob Woodward story about Cheney being drafted in ’08 was just idle speculation? A Republican Deep Throat handed that story to Woodward to pass along. The fact is if Cheney’s doctors give him the go-ahead and IF Cheney is convinced there is a groundswell of support for him, he WILL run in ’08. Look forward to a CONTINUATION of the Bush policies following the next election.]

condi vs. mccain. rove attacks once again.

[Nope. Cheney vs McCain=Cheney Winner. Rove STRIKES again!]

Let them run their nutcase ... and we should pick someone sensible. I like HC, but she simply has no chance for victory. All the general polls do not change the fact that swing state voters will not bite.

[Nutcase McCain might run but he CAN’T win against Cheney. “President Cheney.” Prepare for those words, DUmmies.]

If the Democratic Party runs Hillary ( a pro-war neodem), it deserves to lose. But we don't. If we can't get the party to wake up, the real Democrats ought to put together their own ticket with real Democrats.

[Hillary WILL be your losing candidate. Live with it.]

the media and GOP dictated who our candidate would be and those fine tuned political machines in Iowa and New Hampshire went for it hook, line and sinker. *cough*assholes*cough* It's been interesting to watch the same exact process being put into motion yet again.

[Interesting and FUnnie to see the Democrats falling for it ONCE AGAIN. ’08 will be a DOUBLE WHAMMIE for you folks. Hillary as your losing nominee and Cheney as OUR President.]

Even if she doesn't run, the GOP will make money on the RW's fear that she will. That's why we're hearing so much about her right now.

[All part of the Vast Rovian Storm. Hillary’s name will raise TONS of money. However, she WILL be your nominee. Make no mistake about that. So Rove has said. So let it be done.]

I guess that now, they want to tout her as the be-all of candidates for Dems in 08. We need someone who can WIN and I'm not sure Hillary can - which is why I think they are trying to ram her down our collective throats. And of course, they've subcontraced the MSM to help them do it.

[Choke on the Hillary in your collective throats!]

Sad to say, I don't like her enough to defend her when the hate fest revs in gear. And, I would never vote for either.

[HILLARY vs CHENEY = GOP LANDSLIDE]

We need her but we are too goddam stupid to elect her, so we don't deserve her.

[Hillary is just TOO GOOD for us. We don’t deserve her. Also we don’t deserve that other candidate for sainthood---Andy Stephenson.]

actually, technically, she is a horrendous speaker that has never squelched the "ah" impulse.

[Ah. You know, Hillary, um, does seem to, you know, have that, ah, problem.]

What if it was MCCain vs Clark. That would be interesting.

[About as realistic as Andy Stephenson’s pancreatic cancer. 2008 will be Hillary vs Cheney. Count on it.]


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: andyscam; andystephenson; dummies; hillary2008; hillaryclinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,201-1,211 next last
To: Allosaurs_r_us
DUmmie CK4829 should get some kind of award for this brilliant piece of investigation. I don't know how anyone could argue with this kind of evidence.

ck4829 (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jun-04-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
104. I know who it is!



I said I would investigate it, and I did.

Here is my Investigation.

www.SCAMDY.COM
216.55.128.4#53

http://forum.scamdy.com /

Traceroute
1 lon1-service-1x2-s54.router.demon.net (194.159.246.193) 0.852 ms 0.675 ms 0.602 ms
2 park-inside-2-g3-0-0-s280.router.demon.net (194.70.98.141) 0.591 ms 0.534 ms 0.482 ms
3 ny1-border-1-g0-3-0.router.demon.net (194.70.97.234) 78.497 ms 78.397 ms 78.572 ms
4 ge-7-9.car1.NewYork1.Level3.net (209.246.123.177) 393.144 ms 455.504 ms 206.626 ms
5 ae-1-53.bbr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.68.97.65) 78.471 ms 78.437 ms 78.727 ms
6 as-0-0.mp2.SanDiego1.Level3.net (4.68.128.149) 143.872 ms so-3-0-0.mp1.SanDiego1.Level3.net (64.159.1.137) 186.979 ms as-0-0.mp2.SanDiego1.Level3.net (4.68.128.149) 144.072 ms
7 so-7-0-0.gar1.SanDiego1.Level3.net (4.68.113.70) 143.835 ms so-6-0-0.gar1.SanDiego1.Level3.net (4.68.113.94) 144.787 ms so-7-0-0.gar1.SanDiego1.Level3.net (4.68.113.70) 143.991 ms
8 Aplus-gw.Level3.net (209.245.56.130) 145.438 ms 145.023 ms 145.776 ms
9 192.168.192.22 (192.168.192.22) 144.358 ms 145.229 ms 145.316 ms
10 pro22.abac.com (66.226.64.23) 144.005 ms 145.069 ms 144.399 ms

http://www.thoughtcrimes.org /

www.blackboxvoting.org
NOT directly BBV

mailto: pjcomix@hotmail.com
http://www.pjcomix.com /

www.conservativeunderground.com

http://forum.scamdy.com /

The first recorded person to use the term 'Scamdy' is PJ Comix. He is the one who has done it. He is a Freeper and CU'er, he has also tried to oppose DU in any way possible.

He is the tie between everything.

I say PJ Comix did it.
481 posted on 06/04/2005 9:06:03 AM PDT by ScubaGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies]

To: imskylark

Krystalnacht - in the 1930's when the Nazi brown shirts went around smashing all the windows in Jewish businesses.


482 posted on 06/04/2005 9:12:18 AM PDT by The Right Stuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: ScubaGuy

So it's PJ in the Kitchen with the candlestick? LMAO

Try Again DUmmie CK4829


483 posted on 06/04/2005 9:37:17 AM PDT by beandog (The only time I was wrong was the time I thought I was wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: ScubaGuy
I said I would investigate it, and I did.
 
Is it me, or does this make absolutely no sense at all? How the heck do you find any logic in this? Is he trying to say he traced Scamdy.com back thru BBV and then to PJ Comix .com?
I'd sure like to see how he did that! Oh wait, PJ used the term Scamdy, therefore he did................HUH????????

484 posted on 06/04/2005 10:01:20 AM PDT by Allosaurs_r_us (for a fee........I'm happy to be........Your BACKDOOR MAN!....Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

oh my


485 posted on 06/04/2005 10:07:31 AM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya
It's as if the site was made for viewing only.
 
Its not all the way up yet. It is still in the process of getting everything working. Supposed to be able to register this afternoon. Barring any difficulties. I don't know if you are familiar with setting up a site such as this, but I will be surprised if it is ready before tomorrow.
 
Franksolich just jumped the gun on sending us the link. If you back up the posts a ways he explains.

486 posted on 06/04/2005 10:19:33 AM PDT by Allosaurs_r_us (for a fee........I'm happy to be........Your BACKDOOR MAN!....Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: Allosaurs_r_us

"Is it me, or does this make absolutely no sense at all?"

It isn't just you. I read that post about 20 times trying to find how he came to that conclusion. DUmmie logic!


487 posted on 06/04/2005 10:32:45 AM PDT by ScubaGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival
And he was allowed to have a cell phone there, too - even though cell phones interfere with some of the equipment!

If this is true as the Andyites claim, then I think it shows a total lack of regard for others in ICU. If he wants to endanger his own life by using a cell phone in ICU, that's his prerogative. But cell phone usage in an ICU could affect all life-saving equipment of other patients. THAT is why it would never be allowed.

488 posted on 06/04/2005 10:36:40 AM PDT by Misty Memory (The Grace Goodhue Coolidge of FR as designated by franksolich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Misty Memory

well some people have incredible healing capabilities that allow them to use a phone discreetly in ICU 2.5 hours after an invasive 7.5 hour surgery.

Just some.


489 posted on 06/04/2005 10:46:55 AM PDT by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: ScubaGuy

Wow! He really nailed PJ there! Geeze these people are morons.

<< Is still confused about JLO's post


490 posted on 06/04/2005 11:12:58 AM PDT by Chappaquiddick Crawdad ("E unum pluribus"? Perhaps you meant "ex uno plures", or is that "stultus sum"? hmmm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd
well some people have incredible healing capabilities that allow them to use a phone discreetly in ICU
 
From my experience, any time you are in ICU you are not even conscious let alone use a phone. The reason you are in ICU is because you are so out of it you need monitoring by the minute.
 
How in the heck did he get one anyway. Did he have it hidden on him somewhere? The kind of surgery this guy had, he was friggin naked!
 
The only people let into ICU are immediate relatives, like spouse, mother, father. We know termite was in Seattle. I doubt his mother would be packin a cell phone into ICU, she's 80 years old! His father passed when he was young. His sister sounds like she can't stand him. Maybe a nurse jeopardized her job just to let Scamdy sing show tunes to sfexpat200 back in the DUmpster. Yeah, that's the ticket!

491 posted on 06/04/2005 11:19:59 AM PDT by Allosaurs_r_us (for a fee........I'm happy to be........Your BACKDOOR MAN!....Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]

To: ScubaGuy
Here's their latest breaking evidence against the "perp" PJ-comix, lol! www.democraticunderground.com/discuss

ck4829 Sat Jun-04-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #104
110. Investigation - Chapter II

Another piece of evidence that proves that PJ Comix is behind or is with this Conspiracy to attack DU and try to murder Andy Stephenson is this.

Comix is the fool behind DUmmie FUnnies. Why is the this advertised on the forum of Scamdy? What purpose does it serve? The author of this also refers to the FUnnies on a very personal level.

http://forum.scamdy.com/

492 posted on 06/04/2005 11:29:41 AM PDT by Chappaquiddick Crawdad ("E unum pluribus"? Perhaps you meant "ex uno plures", or is that "stultus sum"? hmmm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: ScubaGuy
Traceroute 1 lon1-service-1x2-s54.router.demon.net (194.159.246.193) 0.852 ms 0.675 ms 0.602 ms 2 park-inside-2-g3-0-0-s280.router.demon.net (194.70.98.141) 0.591 ms 0.534 ms 0.482 ms 3 ny1-border-1-g0-3-0.router.demon.net (194.70.97.234) 78.497 ms 78.397 ms 78.572 ms 4 ge-7-9.car1.NewYork1.Level3.net (209.246.123.177) 393.144 ms 455.504 ms 206.626 ms 5 ae-1-53.bbr1.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.68.97.65) 78.471 ms 78.437 ms 78.727 ms 6 as-0-0.mp2.SanDiego1.Level3.net (4.68.128.149) 143.872 ms so-3-0-0.mp1.SanDiego1.Level3.net (64.159.1.137) 186.979 ms as-0-0.mp2.SanDiego1.Level3.net (4.68.128.149) 144.072 ms 7 so-7-0-0.gar1.SanDiego1.Level3.net (4.68.113.70) 143.835 ms so-6-0-0.gar1.SanDiego1.Level3.net (4.68.113.94) 144.787 ms so-7-0-0.gar1.SanDiego1.Level3.net (4.68.113.70) 143.991 ms 8 Aplus-gw.Level3.net (209.245.56.130) 145.438 ms 145.023 ms 145.776 ms 9 192.168.192.22 (192.168.192.22) 144.358 ms 145.229 ms 145.316 ms 10 pro22.abac.com (66.226.64.23) 144.005 ms 145.069 ms 144.399 ms

So what's this suppose to prove? I do have an idea what the traceroute command is..Here's what Cisco says it is:
Traceroute=To discover the routes that packets will actually take when traveling to a destination, use the traceroute command in user EXEC or privileged EXEC mode. This command is sometimes referred to as "trace". However, on the router it is actually traceroute .
493 posted on 06/04/2005 11:38:09 AM PDT by ReeWalker (Life isn't fair...GET USED TO IT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: franksolich

Please update us when scamdy.com is up and running and we're able to log on.

Whoever designed it, the front page looks great.


494 posted on 06/04/2005 11:42:12 AM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (Somos un país soberano en una época de guerra. ¿Por qué no podemos defender nuestra frontera?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: Chappaquiddick Crawdad

How exactly is anybody trying to murder Scamdy? Nobody here has done anything to keep Scamdy from whatever medical treatment he may actually need. Scamdy's the one that keep putting of "life saving treatment" time and time again.

Seems to me Scamdy wouldn't even know anything about this unless somebody told him from Dummie Land. Therefore, they are responsible for any "emotional problems" he may have.

DUmmies always want to blame everybody else for their problems.


495 posted on 06/04/2005 11:45:27 AM PDT by beandog (The only time I was wrong was the time I thought I was wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: Chappaquiddick Crawdad
Is still confused about JLO's post

I followed that weird exchange and never did figure out what JLO was saying. Any updates??

496 posted on 06/04/2005 11:51:12 AM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: ScubaGuy; PJ-Comix

And you are........?


497 posted on 06/04/2005 12:05:00 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (Somos un país soberano en una época de guerra. ¿Por qué no podemos defender nuestra frontera?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: ReeWalker
I do have an idea what the traceroute command is
 
Traceroute is merely the "jumps from your machine back to the source. Depending how much traffic is on the web at any given moment, you could jump clear around the world from server to server until you get where you want to go.
 
This guy doesn't have a clue! I think he was running a tracer on all the different Web sites listed in his post. Guess what? He came up with some of the same IP addresses in order to get where he was going. So I guess he thinks the web sites are connected. I don't know what else he can possibly be trying to show with this.
 
The Net is like a giant spiderweb. If you run into a bottleneck it will look for a way to go around. A traceroute will look different on every single different machine it is run from. In other words yours will be different from mine, which will be different from Joe Blows, which will be different from Egor Bombarkowitz, which will be different from..............Furthermore you can get a different trace every time you run it depending upon where the bottlenecks of traffic are at the time.
 
Typical DUmpster diving loonietoon logic!

498 posted on 06/04/2005 12:05:11 PM PDT by Allosaurs_r_us (for a fee........I'm happy to be........Your BACKDOOR MAN!....Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
I followed that weird exchange and never did figure out what JLO was saying. Any updates??
 
As close as I can get is she was referring to a conversation on the Misty blog. She thought a post she got from another FReeper was addressing that conversation when actually it was not. That's all it is. Two people talking about two completely different topics.

499 posted on 06/04/2005 12:09:38 PM PDT by Allosaurs_r_us (for a fee........I'm happy to be........Your BACKDOOR MAN!....Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: ReeWalker; All
you will love this..:

Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Sat Jun-04-05 03:03 PM Response to Original message 163. File a lawsuit against both FR and CU, too! You can easily prove they have been fostering this crap on their sites. SUE!

These people are nuts!

500 posted on 06/04/2005 12:09:54 PM PDT by Repub4bush ("Official Foliage Finder" ------Mark Levin the next supreme court justice! :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,201-1,211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson