Posted on 06/03/2005 7:16:14 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
Has Andy Stephenson entered a DUmmieland Witness Protection Program? For the past few days, ever since Andy began publicly harassing the relatives of Bev Harris by posting their names and personal information about them, Scamdy has DISAPPEARED. In fact ALL MENTION in Dummieland about Scamdy’s “pancreatic cancer” has disappeared and if any there are so bold as to post any reference to Scamdy, Skinner immediately sends it down the Memory Pitt. As to Pied Piper Pitt, following his much ballyhooed posting of documents “proving” that Scamdy did indeed have pancreatic cancer, he has retracted his head into his turtle shell and REFUSES to further comment about those documents. One big reason is that those documents Pitt posted accurately predicted in an April 27 FAX that Scamdy would have surgery during the week of May 23 even though at the time of the FAX the surgery was still scheduled for May 10 and wasn’t rescheduled until almost 2 weeks after the FAX was sent. Right now the DUmmies are hoping that the whole Andy Stephenson Situation (as Skinner called it) would just go away. Unfortunately for Dummieland, the DUmmie FUnnies will STILL shine the light on this scandal which demonstrates what a bunch of dim-witted gullible fools the DUmmies were. Until Scamdy or Skinner or Pitt makes a full public confession (or are indicted) the DUmmie FUnnies will consistently hammer the DUmmies on this subject in all future DUmmie FUnnies. This edition of the DUmmie FUnnies based on a DUmmie THREAD titled, “Are we really going to let the GOP talk us into running Hillary?” will continue smoking out the DUmmies on this point. As usual the DUmmie postings still in Scamdy Denial are in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, about to reveal some inside political info he recently received, is in the [brackets]:
Are we really going to let the GOP talk us into running Hillary?
[Consider it payback for talking us into nominating Bob Dole in 1996. Bob Dole didn’t so much run to win as to merely build up his resume. Somehow this latter seemed very important to Dole in his future career of doing Penile Erectile Dysfunction commercials on TV. At least we have no doubt that Dole suffered from this problem (no one admits to this condition unless they really had it) but we STILL don’t know what sort of medical problem Andy Stephenson had although it was almost certainly NOT pancreatic cancer.]
I think she would be an awful candidate. She's not that great a speaker, clearly not at all concerned about corporate power, posturing more and more "moderate" all of the time. The Senate alone has at least a dozen other Democrats who would make better candidates than her.
[All the more reason why Karl Rove has designated her as your ’08 nominee.]
But the GOP is licking its fetid chops, man. They can just about taste the hatefest they would enjoy if she were running. There would be no holds barred on the calumny and slander that they would rain down on her.
[Karl Rove has put out a directive to NOT accuse Hillary of faking a pancreatic cancer operation. Something like that is OFF-LIMITS.]
They are walking a fine line, though. Having demonized her for more than 10 years now, they need to talk Democrats into getting her through the primaries, so they have to cool it down a bit and talk about what a great potential candidate she would be. David Broder put up a column not too long ago just like that.
[Psst! Why do you think the Bushes and Bill Clinton are acting like buddies now? It’s all part of the Rovian Master Plan.]
But they can't stop talking about her. Both Hannity & Colmes and Bill O'Rodent had segments on her Tuesday night. What other Democratic politician gets so much attention from those loons?
[Kerry recently got a flurry of press attention when he FINALLY signed his Form 180 to release his military records to the public. Yes, he FINALLY signed Form 180 and now we are waiting for him to FINALLY drop that signed form in the mail.]
Thinking "well, if the GOP hates her so much, they must be afraid of her, therefore she would be a great candidate" is the trap the Democrats cannot, must not, walk into. Step away. This will be the most important national IQ test for the Democrats in a long time.
[I am SO CONFIDENT of the low DUmmie IQ that I can flat out state the Rovian Game Plan without the slightest fear that you DUmmies can do anything about it. Hey! If you were DUmb enough to send in your money to Andy Stephenson for a phony pancreatic cancer operation then you certainly will easily be manipulated by Karl Rove despite advance warning.]
Having said all that, I'd vote for her in a heartbeat next to any GOP candidate. But please Lahd, and all my fellow Democrats, please don't let it come to that.
[It WILL come to it. And now to announce the ULTIMATE DUmmie nightmare, DUmmie ProfessorPlum. Not only is Karl Rove saddling you with Hillary but the GOP candidate for ’08 has already been decided upon---Dick Cheney. You think that Bob Woodward story about Cheney being drafted in ’08 was just idle speculation? A Republican Deep Throat handed that story to Woodward to pass along. The fact is if Cheney’s doctors give him the go-ahead and IF Cheney is convinced there is a groundswell of support for him, he WILL run in ’08. Look forward to a CONTINUATION of the Bush policies following the next election.]
condi vs. mccain. rove attacks once again.
[Nope. Cheney vs McCain=Cheney Winner. Rove STRIKES again!]
Let them run their nutcase ... and we should pick someone sensible. I like HC, but she simply has no chance for victory. All the general polls do not change the fact that swing state voters will not bite.
[Nutcase McCain might run but he CAN’T win against Cheney. “President Cheney.” Prepare for those words, DUmmies.]
If the Democratic Party runs Hillary ( a pro-war neodem), it deserves to lose. But we don't. If we can't get the party to wake up, the real Democrats ought to put together their own ticket with real Democrats.
[Hillary WILL be your losing candidate. Live with it.]
the media and GOP dictated who our candidate would be and those fine tuned political machines in Iowa and New Hampshire went for it hook, line and sinker. *cough*assholes*cough* It's been interesting to watch the same exact process being put into motion yet again.
[Interesting and FUnnie to see the Democrats falling for it ONCE AGAIN. ’08 will be a DOUBLE WHAMMIE for you folks. Hillary as your losing nominee and Cheney as OUR President.]
Even if she doesn't run, the GOP will make money on the RW's fear that she will. That's why we're hearing so much about her right now.
[All part of the Vast Rovian Storm. Hillary’s name will raise TONS of money. However, she WILL be your nominee. Make no mistake about that. So Rove has said. So let it be done.]
I guess that now, they want to tout her as the be-all of candidates for Dems in 08. We need someone who can WIN and I'm not sure Hillary can - which is why I think they are trying to ram her down our collective throats. And of course, they've subcontraced the MSM to help them do it.
[Choke on the Hillary in your collective throats!]
Sad to say, I don't like her enough to defend her when the hate fest revs in gear. And, I would never vote for either.
[HILLARY vs CHENEY = GOP LANDSLIDE]
We need her but we are too goddam stupid to elect her, so we don't deserve her.
[Hillary is just TOO GOOD for us. We don’t deserve her. Also we don’t deserve that other candidate for sainthood---Andy Stephenson.]
actually, technically, she is a horrendous speaker that has never squelched the "ah" impulse.
[Ah. You know, Hillary, um, does seem to, you know, have that, ah, problem.]
What if it was MCCain vs Clark. That would be interesting.
[About as realistic as Andy Stephenson’s pancreatic cancer. 2008 will be Hillary vs Cheney. Count on it.]
Well, he says he's going to try again tomorrow.
Well, he can try until the cows come home.
I assume he will. He did a good job the first time. I guess if he was the one who did it that is? Give credit where credit is due.
When exactly do the cows come home? I've always wondered:)
Cows come home, naturally, at the end of the day, but in this context of this ancient saying, "he can try until the end of time."
Well, this has been my point all along.
If, after the first fund-raising appeal was posted on DUmmieland, the Andyites had sent a scout over to watch the DUmmie FUnnies 24/7, they would've had time to get their stories straight, and to correct the mistakes.
As it was, the Andyites never discovered the DUmmie FUnnies until we were already three weeks--three weeks! three weeks! three weeks! three weeks!--ahead of them, with no time left to catch up.
Here the Andyites were flailing around at poor Bev Harris, at nice MrNiceGuy, and the other conservative web-site.....all of whom got involved LONG AFTER the DUmmie FUnnies.
Typical leftist arrogance; if they don't agree with, or like, something, they either pretend it doesn't exist or consider it meaningless.
Bah, humbug.
Round One goes to andyscam by a decision. Roung Two up tomorrow. Will there be a knockout? Stay tuned.
STILL looking for donations! (repeat email from yesterday)
Date: 6 Jun 2005 10:02:20 -0000
From: DUPanicRoom@yahoogroups.com Add to Address BookAdd to Address Book
Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoogroups.com. Learn more
To: DUPanicRoom@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [DUPanicRoom] Digest Number 165
"Subject: Re: File - Andy Stephenson Donations
Wouldn't it be better to send donations by check - to avoid paypal
fees? There was some discussion about setting up a trust fund for him. Did
anyone look into that?
DUPanicRoom@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi DU Panic Room Members,
If you are interested in donating to the Andy Stephenson fund raiser,
her is how you can:
go to http://www.paypal.com
If you do not currently have a Paypal account, you will first
need to create one.
Once your account is established, simply click on "Send Money"
Andy's email account is:
Andy_Stephenson@comcast.net
Whatever you can spare until our friend is back on his feet
will be greatly appreciated by Andy, of this I am certain.
He is a good person and needs our help, so please contribute if you
can.
BeHereNow"
Forgive my ignorance, but is @comcast.net nation wide now or did Undie set up a new e-mail acct. while he is in Md.(if he truly is in Md)???
I prefer Dragnet..."Just the facts".
Just got back here. Heck no I'm not mad at you. There is nothing worth getting mad over on this thread. I know what you mean about talking vs. typing. There isn't any "tone" in typed words. I typed a reply to Krodg right before I left the computer and I hope he/she doesn't take it like I'm mad. I forgot to put a "smile" or something like that in my post. I treat people on the internet like I do a stranger. I am never rude or snappy. I'm pretty easy-going.
Now I need to catch up on this thread.
You should post this current fundraising over at Scamdy.com. Or let the owner/admins know about it so they can post it. You really should let someone know it's still going on.
Btw, I'm just catching up so maybe it is already over there. I haven't seen Scamdy.com since it has come back up. HURRAY!
I am not the least bit upset. I don't use smilies myself and am often misunderestimated.
I couldn't agree MORE!
I tried signing up as a new member at andyscam, but I must have screwed it up, somehow. Dang, new sites, new rules, new posting ...
I did post it within Misty Memory's place, though.
http://mistymemory.forumsplace.com/index.html
Well, I know I posted my best that night. Links like you can't remember.
LOL!
Regarding Scamdy.com, does everyone realize that when you are done reading all the threads in a forum, up in the right-hand corner, just above the box that contains the threads, it says "Mark all posts read" that you click that so then when you refresh or come back to the site, only areas where the little square box to the left of the thread titles are gold, there have been new posts since you've been gone?
Sorry for the run on sentence. Last year, I was contributing to a messageboard like Scamdy and it took me awhile to figure it out. I was re-reading so many threads/posts because I didn't mark them read. I was thinking "There's got to be a better way". Duh on me.
Thanks Cali. I am doing the same thing that you described and keep reading the same thing.
OK then, move on, already.
Regarding Scamdy.com, does everyone realize that when you are done reading all the threads in a forum, up in the right-hand corner, just above the box that contains the threads, it says "Mark all posts read" that you click that so then when you refresh or come back to the site, only areas where the little square box to the left of the thread titles are gold, there have been new posts since you've been gone?
Sorry for the run on sentence. Last year, I was contributing to a messageboard like Scamdy and it took me awhile to figure it out. I was re-reading so many threads/posts because I didn't mark them read. I was thinking "There's got to be a better way". Duh on me.
That is uncalled for.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.