Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUmmie FUnnies 06-03-05 ("Are we really going to let the GOP talk us into running Hillary?")
DUmmie FUnnies ^ | June 3, 2005 | DUmmies and PJ-Comix

Posted on 06/03/2005 7:16:14 AM PDT by PJ-Comix

Has Andy Stephenson entered a DUmmieland Witness Protection Program? For the past few days, ever since Andy began publicly harassing the relatives of Bev Harris by posting their names and personal information about them, Scamdy has DISAPPEARED. In fact ALL MENTION in Dummieland about Scamdy’s “pancreatic cancer” has disappeared and if any there are so bold as to post any reference to Scamdy, Skinner immediately sends it down the Memory Pitt. As to Pied Piper Pitt, following his much ballyhooed posting of documents “proving” that Scamdy did indeed have pancreatic cancer, he has retracted his head into his turtle shell and REFUSES to further comment about those documents. One big reason is that those documents Pitt posted accurately predicted in an April 27 FAX that Scamdy would have surgery during the week of May 23 even though at the time of the FAX the surgery was still scheduled for May 10 and wasn’t rescheduled until almost 2 weeks after the FAX was sent. Right now the DUmmies are hoping that the whole Andy Stephenson Situation (as Skinner called it) would just go away. Unfortunately for Dummieland, the DUmmie FUnnies will STILL shine the light on this scandal which demonstrates what a bunch of dim-witted gullible fools the DUmmies were. Until Scamdy or Skinner or Pitt makes a full public confession (or are indicted) the DUmmie FUnnies will consistently hammer the DUmmies on this subject in all future DUmmie FUnnies. This edition of the DUmmie FUnnies based on a DUmmie THREAD titled, “Are we really going to let the GOP talk us into running Hillary?” will continue smoking out the DUmmies on this point. As usual the DUmmie postings still in Scamdy Denial are in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, about to reveal some inside political info he recently received, is in the [brackets]:

Are we really going to let the GOP talk us into running Hillary?

[Consider it payback for talking us into nominating Bob Dole in 1996. Bob Dole didn’t so much run to win as to merely build up his resume. Somehow this latter seemed very important to Dole in his future career of doing Penile Erectile Dysfunction commercials on TV. At least we have no doubt that Dole suffered from this problem (no one admits to this condition unless they really had it) but we STILL don’t know what sort of medical problem Andy Stephenson had although it was almost certainly NOT pancreatic cancer.]

I think she would be an awful candidate. She's not that great a speaker, clearly not at all concerned about corporate power, posturing more and more "moderate" all of the time. The Senate alone has at least a dozen other Democrats who would make better candidates than her.

[All the more reason why Karl Rove has designated her as your ’08 nominee.]

But the GOP is licking its fetid chops, man. They can just about taste the hatefest they would enjoy if she were running. There would be no holds barred on the calumny and slander that they would rain down on her.

[Karl Rove has put out a directive to NOT accuse Hillary of faking a pancreatic cancer operation. Something like that is OFF-LIMITS.]

They are walking a fine line, though. Having demonized her for more than 10 years now, they need to talk Democrats into getting her through the primaries, so they have to cool it down a bit and talk about what a great potential candidate she would be. David Broder put up a column not too long ago just like that.

[Psst! Why do you think the Bushes and Bill Clinton are acting like buddies now? It’s all part of the Rovian Master Plan.]

But they can't stop talking about her. Both Hannity & Colmes and Bill O'Rodent had segments on her Tuesday night. What other Democratic politician gets so much attention from those loons?

[Kerry recently got a flurry of press attention when he FINALLY signed his Form 180 to release his military records to the public. Yes, he FINALLY signed Form 180 and now we are waiting for him to FINALLY drop that signed form in the mail.]

Thinking "well, if the GOP hates her so much, they must be afraid of her, therefore she would be a great candidate" is the trap the Democrats cannot, must not, walk into. Step away. This will be the most important national IQ test for the Democrats in a long time.

[I am SO CONFIDENT of the low DUmmie IQ that I can flat out state the Rovian Game Plan without the slightest fear that you DUmmies can do anything about it. Hey! If you were DUmb enough to send in your money to Andy Stephenson for a phony pancreatic cancer operation then you certainly will easily be manipulated by Karl Rove despite advance warning.]

Having said all that, I'd vote for her in a heartbeat next to any GOP candidate. But please Lahd, and all my fellow Democrats, please don't let it come to that.

[It WILL come to it. And now to announce the ULTIMATE DUmmie nightmare, DUmmie ProfessorPlum. Not only is Karl Rove saddling you with Hillary but the GOP candidate for ’08 has already been decided upon---Dick Cheney. You think that Bob Woodward story about Cheney being drafted in ’08 was just idle speculation? A Republican Deep Throat handed that story to Woodward to pass along. The fact is if Cheney’s doctors give him the go-ahead and IF Cheney is convinced there is a groundswell of support for him, he WILL run in ’08. Look forward to a CONTINUATION of the Bush policies following the next election.]

condi vs. mccain. rove attacks once again.

[Nope. Cheney vs McCain=Cheney Winner. Rove STRIKES again!]

Let them run their nutcase ... and we should pick someone sensible. I like HC, but she simply has no chance for victory. All the general polls do not change the fact that swing state voters will not bite.

[Nutcase McCain might run but he CAN’T win against Cheney. “President Cheney.” Prepare for those words, DUmmies.]

If the Democratic Party runs Hillary ( a pro-war neodem), it deserves to lose. But we don't. If we can't get the party to wake up, the real Democrats ought to put together their own ticket with real Democrats.

[Hillary WILL be your losing candidate. Live with it.]

the media and GOP dictated who our candidate would be and those fine tuned political machines in Iowa and New Hampshire went for it hook, line and sinker. *cough*assholes*cough* It's been interesting to watch the same exact process being put into motion yet again.

[Interesting and FUnnie to see the Democrats falling for it ONCE AGAIN. ’08 will be a DOUBLE WHAMMIE for you folks. Hillary as your losing nominee and Cheney as OUR President.]

Even if she doesn't run, the GOP will make money on the RW's fear that she will. That's why we're hearing so much about her right now.

[All part of the Vast Rovian Storm. Hillary’s name will raise TONS of money. However, she WILL be your nominee. Make no mistake about that. So Rove has said. So let it be done.]

I guess that now, they want to tout her as the be-all of candidates for Dems in 08. We need someone who can WIN and I'm not sure Hillary can - which is why I think they are trying to ram her down our collective throats. And of course, they've subcontraced the MSM to help them do it.

[Choke on the Hillary in your collective throats!]

Sad to say, I don't like her enough to defend her when the hate fest revs in gear. And, I would never vote for either.

[HILLARY vs CHENEY = GOP LANDSLIDE]

We need her but we are too goddam stupid to elect her, so we don't deserve her.

[Hillary is just TOO GOOD for us. We don’t deserve her. Also we don’t deserve that other candidate for sainthood---Andy Stephenson.]

actually, technically, she is a horrendous speaker that has never squelched the "ah" impulse.

[Ah. You know, Hillary, um, does seem to, you know, have that, ah, problem.]

What if it was MCCain vs Clark. That would be interesting.

[About as realistic as Andy Stephenson’s pancreatic cancer. 2008 will be Hillary vs Cheney. Count on it.]


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: andyscam; andystephenson; dummies; hillary2008; hillaryclinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,081-1,1001,101-1,1201,121-1,140 ... 1,201-1,211 next last
To: beandog
It just occurred to me - why haven't the PTB at the DUmmie Farm killed this thread, seeing as how it's (indirectly, admittedly) about The Unmentionable One?
1,101 posted on 06/06/2005 4:42:40 PM PDT by decal (Where were YOU when AndyScam broke? Sluthering, perhaps?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1098 | View Replies]

To: decal

You're right! LOCK, BAN, DELETE! Hahaha


1,102 posted on 06/06/2005 4:43:39 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (You don't have to bother with me....I'm NON-RELEVANT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1101 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Who the hecks liberypirate, I don't remember defaming him?

Nasty storm rolling in probably should shut down for a while. Maybe the DUmmies heads did explode. It sure sounds like it out there. Everybody have fun while I'm gone.


1,103 posted on 06/06/2005 4:44:49 PM PDT by beandog (Bean the Real Dog -we love you - our hearts are breaking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1100 | View Replies]

To: decal
Latest at DU:

"sfexpat2000 (1000+ posts) Mon Jun-06-05 07:42 PM
Response to Original message

132. So, they got the site back up. What an accomplishment


If I had my wish, this would be it.

To let them continue to do exactly what they're doing. Slandering honest people and trying to get attention, like 2 year olds, by doing that.

We have better things to do, as any casual glance at our forums will tell us.

I'm so done with this.

Beth"


Sounds like SOMEONE wants O-U-T....it's (possibly) not TOO late to squeal, ma'am.
1,104 posted on 06/06/2005 4:45:33 PM PDT by decal (Where were YOU when AndyScam broke? Sluthering, perhaps?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1101 | View Replies]

To: decal

I bet she could cop a plea bargain if she had to.


1,105 posted on 06/06/2005 4:48:00 PM PDT by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1104 | View Replies]

To: decal
I don't think I'll even bother again.

Too many people dropping hints to keep you coming back...but never any answers.

1,106 posted on 06/06/2005 4:48:25 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1096 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya
At Scamdy:

In total there are 38 users online :: 7 Registered, 0 Hidden and 31 Guests

Can DUers handle the truth? At least some of them want to find out.
1,107 posted on 06/06/2005 4:51:57 PM PDT by decal (Where were YOU when AndyScam broke? Sluthering, perhaps?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1102 | View Replies]

To: Krodg

I would like to be in on a few of the answers, but aside from the seriousness of the scam, this has intrigued my curiosity and tickled my funny bone.


1,108 posted on 06/06/2005 4:52:25 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (You don't have to bother with me....I'm NON-RELEVANT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1106 | View Replies]

To: dynoman; MarineMom613; PJ-Comix; franksolich; All

"Did anyone get a screen cap??"

Yes, I did, for some odd reason, lol, but it seems to working ok now.
http://forum.scamdy.com/index.php

Funny! The DUmp is skipping rope about how they shut her down!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=3783013#3783057


1,109 posted on 06/06/2005 4:54:13 PM PDT by JLO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 968 | View Replies]

To: decal

You just know they want answers to this as much as we do. Why don't they just use a different screen name like almost everybody else does? Take too much imagination to come up with one? LOL


1,110 posted on 06/06/2005 4:54:45 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (You don't have to bother with me....I'm NON-RELEVANT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1107 | View Replies]

To: decal

Well, dadgumit, I have to head to town now for a dinner date.

Back in a bit, regretably missing all the excitement.


1,111 posted on 06/06/2005 4:55:22 PM PDT by franksolich (non-existent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1107 | View Replies]

To: JLO
"LittleClarkie (1000+ posts) Mon Jun-06-05 07:47 PM
Response to Original message

8. Oh well, refresh the page several times like I did


and move on. At least we can cost them bandwidth."


YEAH, THAT'LL show 'em!

Why don't you TP the place, too, while you're at it?

"Hey, Scamdy, do you have Prince Albert in a can?"
1,112 posted on 06/06/2005 4:59:41 PM PDT by decal (Where were YOU when AndyScam broke? Sluthering, perhaps?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1109 | View Replies]

To: decal

I think they can try and stifle free speech all they want, and they can try and keep down the truth. But, eventually it is getting its opportunity it looks like.

My next question. When all the stuff is collected, and people get a shot to refute over there - where does this go next?

I think others have been thinking the same thing.


1,113 posted on 06/06/2005 5:04:26 PM PDT by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1112 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd
"When all the stuff is collected, and people get a shot to refute over there - where does this go next?"

Exactly - is there enough here to get someone indicted?

Lotsa smoke here, but is there enough fire?

Does anyone know anyone in a DA office in WA or MD who could tell us?
1,114 posted on 06/06/2005 5:08:30 PM PDT by decal (Where were YOU when AndyScam broke? Sluthering, perhaps?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1113 | View Replies]

To: decal

I don't.


1,115 posted on 06/06/2005 5:10:38 PM PDT by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1114 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya
I would like to be in on a few of the answers

My post didn't have anything to do with me wanting to be in on a few answers. I am just disgusted that the people that claim to have info lead us along and never follow through.

1,116 posted on 06/06/2005 5:13:09 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1108 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
Sorry that I mistook what you meant. I do have questions though, but in an Agatha Christie sort of way.

Plu, I'm nosey! LOL

1,117 posted on 06/06/2005 5:20:59 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (You don't have to bother with me....I'm NON-RELEVANT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1116 | View Replies]

To: franksolich

This one's for you, bud. http://forum.scamdy.com/viewtopic.php?t=41


1,118 posted on 06/06/2005 5:25:00 PM PDT by JLO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1111 | View Replies]

To: JLO

Uh, contrary to what my sinister counterpart, Mr. Book Publisher, is claiming in DUmmieland, nothing was changed, no information was taken off.

Scamdy is exactly the same as it had been, with of course substantial additions the past hour.


1,119 posted on 06/06/2005 5:31:55 PM PDT by franksolich (non-existent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1118 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix; All
ck4829 (1000+ posts) Mon Jun-06-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message

6. You guys want to see something weird?

http://forum.scamdy.com/viewtopic.php?t=32

Go down to the bottom thread. All of those posts were written by one guy.

I'm sensing Obsessive Behaviors from this guy.

------------------------------------------------------

link

Looks like DUmmie ck4829 (who incidentally accused PJ of being the mastermind behind scamdy.com) just now found out about the DUmmie FUnnies! Damn these DUmmies are slow! And far from PJ showing "obsessive behaviors", this DUmmie seems to be himself obsessed with trying to support his misguided attempts at implicating PJ in just about everything that is evil in the world. Quite humorous, really. Maybe in his overzealous crusade (i.e. wild goose chase) to expose our good friend PJ for the monster that he is (lol!) he'll read a good portion of the DUFU's and come to an epiphany about Scamdy and his real motives. Of course that would assume ck4829 has the mental capacity of which he has so far shown no intimation.

1,120 posted on 06/06/2005 5:46:59 PM PDT by Chappaquiddick Crawdad ("E unum pluribus"? Perhaps you meant "ex uno plures", or is that "stultus sum"? hmmm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,081-1,1001,101-1,1201,121-1,140 ... 1,201-1,211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson