Posted on 02/13/2005 3:07:53 PM PST by conservative_crusader
As in all vanities of this style, I would suggest any people who get overly angry and upset over religious vs. secular debate immediately stop reading.
First, before going any farther, I need to make known my position:
1.) I am persuaded that the universe was created by some higher power.
2.) I am a Christian in practice.
3.) My intention in this vanity, is to discuss the possibility of god(s) existing.
4.) If you have any other question as to what my motive is, please feel free to post, or send me a private message.
Let us begin the actual discussion with an argument as to whether god(s) exist. Here is the given:
1.) The Universe either A.)came into being at some point in time, B.)has always existed just as it is, or C.)does not exist at all. (If there are any other possibilities here, please tell me what you've come up with).
2.) Time is Linear.(as in, can be plotted on a line approaching infinity in both directions).
3.) For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
4.) Matter/Energy, cannot be created or destroyed.
5.) Occasionally all elements decay into some stable element(like lead,) which is incapable of sustaining life.
6.) All other laws of physics apply.
So, from #1, let us assume scenario B. The Universe has always existed in much the same way forever as it is today. Let us apply given #5 and #4 to this scenario. So, by #5, all the matter in the universe is presently lead, as it has had an infinite amount of time in which to decay into lead, and by #4, no new matter can be introduced into the universe so everything is lead. However; we know that the entire universe is not lead, so scenario B cannot be true.
Now, let us consider scenario C. If scenario C is true, then this is merely an attempt by your imagination to convince you that the unverse is real, which it isn't, and so this entire thread is pointless. If it is pointless, there is no point in discussing this further. So let us not accept scenario C for the moment.
Now, assume scenario A. The universe came into being at some point. If the universe came into being at some point, there must have been some cause in order to trigger what is often called the"The Big Bang." So, since no matter could have exsisted before the universe was created, there must be some other cause by which the universe was created. My contention, is that force is God, or a god.
Now that I've finished my proof, let me go over some of the responses I've gotten to similair posts.
Generic Response #1: Evolution contradicts that god(s) exist.
My answer #1: Evolution does not contradict that there is a god. Evolution only explains a means by which god *may* have created life on Earth.
Generic Response #2: Abiogenesis
My answer #2: All of the articles on Abiogenesis that I have read, never really contradict that a god did not have a hand in creation. If you can find one, I would welcome a response.
Generic Response #3: Your first given is flawed. There are more possibilities explaining the universe than those.
My answer #3: There are no other possibilities that I am aware of. If you can think of any other possibilities please post them.
Generic Response #4: Time is not linear, the second given is false.
My answer #4: Just because time is not linear in actuality, does not mean that it cannot be plotted as a line on a graph. Time can be represented as a line, that is all that is important for this argument.
Generic Response #5: The third given is flawed. Recent research indicates that there does not neccesarily have to be a cause when the universe began.
My answer #5: Source please.
Generic Response #6: Recent science indicates two things. A.) The universe is expanding and B.) As the universe expands, matter is introduced into the system.
My response #6: If the universe has been expanding forever, then matter has been being introduced into the universe for an infinite amount of time. Therefore, the entire universe is filled with matter. However; the entire universe is not filled with matter, which indicates that something in these recent discoveries is false.
Generic Response #7: The fifth given is false. Not everything decays into lead.
My response #7: read your physics book.
Generic Response #8: The last given is false. You cannot assume that just because the laws of physics behave in one way in this region of the universe, that they would behave in the same way in other parts of the universe.
My Response #8: If evidence actually surfaces supporting this I will grant you this point, but you must post a source. Also, not all of the laws of physics have to behave in the same way everywhere, only the ones that are given in the my list of given laws have to behave appropriately for my argument to stand.
Generic Response #9: You can't prove anything.
My answer #9: Yes you can, and your argument is semantic.
Generic Response #10: You can assume everything, and I assume there is no god.
My answer #10: Then I assume that opposite poles of magnets will not attract each other. That doesn't make it so.
I too am a Christian, who believes that EVERYTHING was created by God. However, I do not believe this is something you can prove through the use of physics or any scientific method which relies solely upon that which can be understood or explained by man. Why? because the physical realm was created from a higher plain of existence which is beyond our scope of observation... God is Spirit, and brought the physical into existence from the spiritual realm at the utterance of His Word. And, as God so frequently demonstrates in His word through miracles, the spiritual realm operates above the laws of physics and consistently defies man's understanding of the universe. |
Likewise I am a Christian and all the evidence I need is the Bible. This marvelous Book describes everything a person has to know about our short time here on earth. It tells where we came from and where we are headed.
Explain !!!
Comments solicited, when you're able to.
I am convinced beyond the shadow of a doubt that Jesus of Nazareth is the Messiah foretold in the Old Testament. I believe that He was the son of God. I also believe that he was without sin. Also, he was crucified on a cross, and because he did not earn, or deserve death, he was capable of saving the world from its sin. I know that I am a sinner, and I have dedicated my life to being a witness for him. Finally, I try to the best of my ability to repent from the sins that I am guilty of.
Does that work for you?
Because, all radioactive elements have displayed a tendency to decay into lead. We also know, that all elements are slightly radioactive, although the amount of radioactivity is very slight compared to deadly amounts. So, we can conclude that all elements will eventually decay into lead.
This is the first I've ever heard this. I took nuclear chemistry a long time ago, and I don't remember this being discussed. Maybe someone with some expertise on the topic can clarify it.
Ergo, even if the universe were infinitely old, it would not be 100% lead.
You lay it out right but scientists will quibble with the language..science does reject life being meaningless or time being infinite in the past, and accepts an origin.
but it thinks a first cause is beyond its study when it studies causes all the time..you've expressed the basic proof of first cause, what remains is to make that Cause personal.
#3: more possibilities?? right answer, that they are meaningless until stated and explained (& then they resolve to what's been said already)
#5: there does not neccesarily have to be a cause when the universe began. this is close to what stephen hawking says in any book.
the response is (see my homepage) either the origin is ordered or not. order arising from disorder is ridiculous on many counts. so the latent order of the universe is the first cause. (hint: latent order = immanence)
your response #6 not stated best but it echoes the correct response..similarly #7 maybe not lead but you said 'something like lead'
finally the philosophy arguments are where scientists retreat when their idolatry don't work
Good catch sir. I will grant that the universe would not be 100% lead, however, it does not have to be 100% lead in order for the universe to be incapable of supporting life. Because the universe does support life, we know that the universe must have come into being at some point in time.
In fact, I'll take it a step further: elements heavier than lead tend to be rather rare in nature, and where they do exist there are plenty of natural explanations for how they were formed. There are lots of nuclear reactions going on in the universe.
I believe in God, but I've come to the conclusion that it's probably not possible to prove his existence scientifically. Of course, I could be wrong, so I'm happy to consider any "proofs" you might have to offer. This proof seems pretty lacking, though.
There was an event that changed all of history. The death and resurrection of God, as evidenced by over 500 people. And that is setting aside the incredible types and number of supernatural miracles He performed while He walked around in Israel.
On top of that, Jesus Christ fulfilled over three hundred prophecies contained in the Jewish Scriptures. Their entire sacrificial system was a lead in to the work the Messiah accomplished on the cross.
Jesus Christ, who we can know personally, and that many recorded witnesses knew physically, created the universe and confirmed the process as recorded in Genesis.
Mar 10:6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.
Yes, there exist some radioactive isotopes of lighter elements, such as Carbon 14, but they don't decay into lead. Cabon 14 decays into nitrogen, which in turn is stable and doesn't decay into anything. Cosmic radiation can turn Nitrogen into Carbon 14, but Nitrogen itself does not spontaneously decay into anything. Therefore, we'd expect to see lots of nitrogen and carbon lying around even if the universe were infinitely lived.
So unless my memory of nuclear chemistry is way off, which is possible, I admit, your argument does not hold water.
If I got the science wrong, please feel free to correct me.
Very true, and that is why this thread is important. I just thought I would throw the God/ Man into the mix. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.