Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUmmie FUnnies 01-10-05 ("CBS Ousts 4 For Bush Guard Story")
DUmmie FUnnies ^ | January 10, 2005 | DUmmies and PJ-Comix

Posted on 01/10/2005 5:24:08 PM PST by PJ-Comix

It is interesting to read the Dummie reaction to the release of the CBS Memogate report and the firing of 4 news employees on this THREAD titled, “CBS Ousts 4 For Bush Guard Story.” If you remember, the DUmmies swallowed that original 60 Minutes story hook, line, and sinker. They were gloating over the damage the CBS Texas Air National story did to Bush. But even as they were gloating, Freeper Buckhead had already cast aspersions upon the authenticity of the letter CBS used to support their assertion that Bush got special treatment in the National Guard. Within days, the DUmmie gloating turned to ashes in their mouths as it turned out the letter was fraudulent. One strange aftereffect of this affair is that many DUmmies wanted to become leftwing versions of Buckhead as can be noted in their wild theories to explain away many things, such as why Bush won the election. However, let us now observe the DUmmie reaction to the release of the Memogate report. As usual the DUmmie comments are in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent is in the [brackets]:

Most people here on DU will see it as a reiteration...of the shrub's spoiled childhood, but I guarantee that the talking heads and right-wing radio will focus on....."The panel said a “myopic zeal” to be the first news organization to broadcast".... and use that as "proof" of left-wing media bias.

[Actually the panel went pretty soft on the bias issue. Does anybody, except INSANE DUmmies, actually think this wasn’t a case of bias against Bush on the part of CBS and Dan Rather?]

Why are Dem media persona held to higher standards than Republicans?

[Thanx for the admission that Dan Rather, Mary Mapes, & CBS personnel are DEMOCRATS.]

Because they are purging Dems from big media.

[And thank you for seconding the admission.]

If you read the debates in DU at the time CBS aired the piece you will find that there were quite a few DUers that did not believe the documents were authentic and that took offense to Dan Rather's stonewalling when questions were raised in the MSM about the same documents.

[Dummie Moderator IndianaGreen here trying to rewrite history. Very LITTLE questioning of the authenticity of documents in DUmmieland when the initial doubts began. When later it was almost impossible to deny the fact that the TANG letter was a forgery, the DUmmies blamed Karl Rove for being behind it.]

There has been no evidence whatsoever that proves that these documents are false regardless of what Howie Kurtz and the rest of the major propagandists tell you.

[And this DUmmie gives lie to IndianaGreen’s assertion that there was much doubt cast upon the authenticity of those documents in DUmmieland. The fact is that, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, many or perhaps most DUmmies STILL believe they were authentic.]

AFTER the report aired, and the freepers "discovered" that the memos were phony (it was clear they were tipped off by someone in the Rove network) -- only THEN did Mary Mapes decide it would be a good idea to call Burkett's alleged source. The alleged source told that he knew nothing about the memos.

[Yes it was all part of a vast Rovian network that tipped off the freepers about the phony memos.]

The memos were never determined to be phony. What was determined was that they had been copied so many times over that it was impossible to determine they were authentic. By extension, it was also impossible to determine they were phony.

[Plus there was the matter of the justified right margin and the th superscript that an ordinary typewriter of the early 70s would have been able to reproduce. But let us not let the facts stand in the way that it was only a matter of being copied so many times that the authenticity could not have been verified.]

The focus should be on the content, not on the pieces of paper themselves.

[The TANG story MUST be true even if the facts don’t support it.]

And the sad fact of the matter is that there is damned good evidence that bush* DID NOT fulfill his Guard obligation, not to mention being AWOL (which, by ALL definitions he was) or his disobeying a DIRECT ORDER to have his physical so he could maintain his flight status. It seems the whole mess is now a non-story. But keep in mind that the documents have NEVER been proved to be a forgery. NEVER!!

[I can just picture this DUmmie getting wasted at a bar with Dan Rather and they are both screaming together: “The documents have NEVER been proved to be a forgery. NEVER!!”]

Rather and Guiliani should charter the "We Got Roved" Club

[A Perfect Rovian Storm.]

CBS's mishandling of this news story effectively neutralized the issue of Bush's missing service in the TANG. It was almost as if CBS's source had been an agent of the GOP, and CBS took the bait (along with many other people).

[And judging from all the gloating in DUmmieland right after the TANG story aired, most of you DUmmies took the bait too.]

The documents gave easy cover to the Republicans during the campaign, and that pisses me off.

[My condolences on the fact that the TANG story backfired on you.]

Rather and Mapes were after Bush for five years. Bush knew this, Rove knew this and they played Rather like a fool. Whether the story was planted by Rove or not, Mapes should have taken the time to decipher the story before presenting it to Rather for broadcast. The story they should have run should not have been about Bush's TANG service. It should have been about passing off documents to CBS.

[Right. Karl Rove dressed up like Lucy Ramirez and passed the fake documents off to a drunken Burkett in a Kinko’s parking lot.]

When this broke, I kinda felt this way too. I mean, it was just too perfect for Bush, it made him out to be the victim! We still don't know WHERE those documents came from. It looks like we never may know, but it SURE was too convenient for Bush, wasn't it...

[Let me get this straight. The documents are authentic but if they are fake it was because it was a Rovian operation to sting CBS.]

Where is the report on Ohio?

[On the bottom of Karl Rove’s bird cage.]

Back when this thing broke out, I remember thinking how this was so perfect for Bush. It worked in his favor, and most of my not-too-political friends (most democrats) thought that this DID prove that CBS was biased. I can imagine that this probably converted a few more votes to Bush from those idiot "undecideds".

[Just enough votes to give the election to Bush. The vast Rovian plot worked PERFECTLY.]

The real story here is Bush missing his physical. Why? He had been doing community service in Houston on a coke possession charge. He would have failed the drug test. Helen Thomas tried to get information on this at a WH press conference but was rudely ignored. Rove wanted to divert all guard duty issues to Bush's service only

[And I have an early 70s letter here with a right justified margin and superscript th to verify this story.]

the republicans own the media in all shapes and forms...there is no getting the truth out.....its hidden...except when the Democrats are in the wrong and everything is blown out of context........

[Apparently your meds have already kicked in.]

Is there a good blog that tells our side of the story?

[www.AlternateReality.com]


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: cbs; danrather; dummies; marymapes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 next last
To: Laurita
It's ok, most of us have seen fabrication and outrageous ones on line. No one was accusing, just questioning after seeing other instances in the past.

We know you, as all of us do, feel for the family, and wish him RIP.
141 posted on 01/10/2005 8:47:35 PM PST by gidget7 (God Bless America, and our President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

Excellent, I've been wondering if anything like that was going to show up.


142 posted on 01/10/2005 8:48:29 PM PST by Laurita (It might be bad, but at least no one is shooting at us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: EllaMinnow
whatever happened to Mari33

I remember her.

She had long threads where disaster after ever growing disaster struck her and hers.

(A think Freepers beat up her son, or somesuch)

I just laughed and laughed watching the DU rubes swallow every word....

....along with Bev's ha ha hahahahaha....

143 posted on 01/10/2005 8:53:24 PM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: gidget7
We know you, as all of us do, feel for the family, and wish him RIP.

Very much so. People die doing everything else, I'm sure people die at the computer. The fake dramas one gets drawn into at one time or another tend to jade one. There was a time when every other person online was a bed-ridden invalid with no outlet except for his/her computer. The false stories undercut the true ones in ways their perpetrators never imagine.

144 posted on 01/10/2005 8:53:50 PM PST by Laurita (It might be bad, but at least no one is shooting at us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: gidget7
Now I am not saying this is the case, BUT, the extent of the posting by his mother is a bit odd

Please excuse Epstein.

signed, Epstein's mother

145 posted on 01/10/2005 8:56:04 PM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
Please excuse Epstein. signed, Epstein's mother

LOL!

146 posted on 01/10/2005 8:58:30 PM PST by Laurita (It might be bad, but at least no one is shooting at us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
I am ROFLMAO PJ-Comix! Great stuff!

These DUmmie Funnies are the most laughs I have all day, don't ever stop, man. :-)

NFP

147 posted on 01/10/2005 9:08:56 PM PST by Notforprophet (Democrats have stood their own arguments on their heads so often that they now stand for nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Nice job is that haiku?

NFP

148 posted on 01/10/2005 9:10:46 PM PST by Notforprophet (Democrats have stood their own arguments on their heads so often that they now stand for nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Notforprophet

I don't know. Got it off of Sad Poetry for Sad People.


149 posted on 01/10/2005 9:14:34 PM PST by Dallas59 ("A weak peace is worse than war" - Tacitcus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: beckysueb
It just doesn't seem like the thing a grieving mother would do. Not unless they are stranger than fiction.

For pity's sake, all of you, stop all this harping on his mother! I lost my beloved 25 year-old son very suddenly also, two years ago. I was a total basket case. For a very long time, some things I did to cope could have been construed as very weird too.

Poor Kephra's mother is in shock. People in shock, especially mothers who've lost their children, do odd things. Perhaps logging on to DU to announce his passing was a way of feeling like he was still there, like she hadn't really lost him.

Unless you have been in her place, you have no idea how intense is her pain and loss. And as if his dying weren't enough, she was the one who found him! I don't care what wacko political persuasion she or her departed son were of; right now she is a suffering human being. Leave her alone and let her grieve whatever way she needs to.

150 posted on 01/10/2005 9:37:14 PM PST by Scothia (If you pray for rain, prepare to deal with some mud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
...all mom had to do was sit down, hit the "new thread" button and start typing.

I get this mental picture of her discovering him slumped over the keyboard, then shoving him out of the way to post his obit to the DUmpster!

151 posted on 01/10/2005 9:45:02 PM PST by luvie (Notice the DUM's don't talk about 3rd-term presidencies since November 2nd--hmmmm??!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Scothia
I don't think anyone is harping on or attacking a grieving mother. Certainly no one has questioned the pain a mother is in upon losing a child. A little skepticism and a little gallows humor, that's all that's going on here. I very seriously doubt that anyone on this forum has not experienced a life-changing loss, some of us deal with it differently than others.
152 posted on 01/10/2005 9:47:19 PM PST by Laurita (It might be bad, but at least no one is shooting at us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: LUV W

me too.


153 posted on 01/10/2005 9:50:57 PM PST by Laurita (It might be bad, but at least no one is shooting at us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Is there a good blog that tells our side of the story?

The DUmmie FUnnies, of course!!! Thanks for the thousands of laughs!

154 posted on 01/10/2005 9:52:03 PM PST by luvie (Notice the DUM's don't talk about 3rd-term presidencies since November 2nd--hmmmm??!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laurita

I'm kinda like you--it is so bizarre that it is hard not to become a little goulish while visualizing it. And, I wish them no harm, but pray that they might be comforted. But.....


155 posted on 01/10/2005 9:54:54 PM PST by luvie (Notice the DUM's don't talk about 3rd-term presidencies since November 2nd--hmmmm??!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
The TANG story was a huge part of Farinhate 911. Michael Maroon even had documents showing he missed his physical and the big conspiracy of him missing his last year. DNCBS was just validating the Crockumentary.

Pray for W and Our Troops

156 posted on 01/10/2005 9:57:35 PM PST by bray (The First of 4 More Years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Laurita
Certainly no one has questioned the pain a mother is in upon losing a child.

Yes, go ahead and justify yourself now. But I have seen several posts in this thread question not only her pain, but whether or not the son actually died and the mother actually exists.

I expected much better from people on FR. Perhaps I was naive.

157 posted on 01/10/2005 10:08:00 PM PST by Scothia (If you pray for rain, prepare to deal with some mud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Scothia

As I said, no one is questioning the pain of a mother who has lost her child, but are you suggesting that we take it at face value that anyone died because someone said it on DU?


158 posted on 01/10/2005 10:12:23 PM PST by Laurita (It might be bad, but at least no one is shooting at us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Scothia

You don't know me or whether or not I have "been there". February 4, 2000, at 11:20pm, I was awakened by a phone call. My oldest son and my 10 year old grandson had been taken to the hospital both in critical condition after their house caught fire. My 2 grandaughters, ages 6 and 18 monthes, were dead. My son nearly died trying to save them. When the police got there, they held my screaming son to keep him from going back in the house after his children. The policeman told me it was the hardest thing he ever did. The policeman cried while he held my horribly burned son while my grandaughters burned to death in that house. The last thing the baby saw while she screamed in panic was her Daddy's face through the flames trying to get to her. He broke out a window from the outside trying to get her. He reached through the window trying to pull her off the bed but came up with her empty blanket. Thats how close he came to saving her. He was placed in an ambulance and watched as they brought his 2 little dead girls out of that burning house. He laid in the hospital in critical care for 2 weeks fighting for his life. He repeated over and over, "My babies, my babies". When he finally began to improve, his babies were already buried and he never got to say goodbye to them. Our family has to live with the pain of this tradgedy every day of our lives, so don't presume to tell me I have never been there. I voiced an opinion and until it becomes illegal to have an opinion, I will continue to voice my opinions.


159 posted on 01/10/2005 10:50:42 PM PST by beckysueb (God bless America and President Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: LUV W

Well the dummies have screwed the pooch now. They are admitting on their open forum to hacking an Ohio BOE server and are in cahoots with Cliff Arnnebeck. They are discussing it on this thread

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=203&topic_id=275726&mesg_id=275726

I have sent the thread to the FBI and to the Ohio Secretary of State.


160 posted on 01/10/2005 11:24:18 PM PST by Texasforever (It's hard to kiss the lips at night that chew your butt out all day long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson