Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush's Military Record Reveals Grounding and Absence for Two Full Years
Progressive News ^ | Oct 4, 2000 | Robert A. Rogers (USAF - Ret)

Posted on 09/24/2004 6:22:01 PM PDT by The Real Indepman

"Why would a physical exam present a problem for 1st Lt. Bush? A little-know fact reported in the London Times and the New York Post on June 18, 2000 gives a powerful clue. In April 1972 – the same month that Bush "gave up" flying – all the overseas and stateside military services began subjecting a small random sample in their ranks to substance abuse testing for alcohol and drugs. The Pentagon had announced its intention to do so initially back on December 31, 1969. If Bush reported for his scheduled physical in August 1972, he could have been subject to selection for a random substance abuse test.

Bush's spokesman told the London Times that Bush "was not aware of any changes that required a drug test." But this does not hold up under scrutiny. In 1969 – the year following Bush's enlistment – the Pentagon notified every unit in the military that it would implement random drug testing at some point in the near future. When that moment arrived – April 1972 – every enlisted person and officer throughout the military, both overseas and stateside, would have been aware of this dramatic change. After all, the whole purpose of the random drug testing was to make it absolutely clear to everyone in the Armed Forces that the Pentagon would not tolerate substance abuse of any kind by anyone.

There is circumstantial evidence pointing to substance abuse by Bush during this period. On the campaign trail, Bush has stated that he has not used drugs or alcohol in excess since 1974. But this chronology makes it possible that he was in fact abusing one or more of these substances in the summer of 1972."


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: ang; bush; demoncrat; lies; ltbush; militaryrecord; napalminthemorning; newbie; smear; tang; troll; wod; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
I need a team assist on disproving this. I believe USAF and ANG random drug testing did not begin until the 1980s. I also am certain that drug testing did not become part of a physical until the 1990s unless it was commander directed. If anyone knows of a reference to when USAF and ANG implemented random drug testing please post it. Thanks...
1 posted on 09/24/2004 6:22:01 PM PDT by The Real Indepman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman

Buh Bye


2 posted on 09/24/2004 6:22:45 PM PDT by Texasforever (Mainstream Media Has Been Outsourced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman

Tureeza? Is that you?


3 posted on 09/24/2004 6:23:29 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman

"There is circumstantial evidence"??? Nice to have you on the board DAN! ROFLMAO!!


4 posted on 09/24/2004 6:23:55 PM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman

Breaking hard: G.W. Bush dated both Jane Fonda and John Kerry!!!!! Tell everyone you know.


5 posted on 09/24/2004 6:24:13 PM PDT by Drango (PJs? Never. FReep in the "Buff")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman

This is bullshit. And you might be history.


6 posted on 09/24/2004 6:24:35 PM PDT by sinkspur ("John Kerry's gonna win on his juices. "--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman

The article is from www.democrats.com

Buh bye


7 posted on 09/24/2004 6:24:47 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman
Post hoc, ergo propter hoc!

Logic 101. Day 1. Lesson 1.

8 posted on 09/24/2004 6:25:58 PM PDT by boojumsnark (Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman

Joe? Joe Lockhart? What are you doing up so late?


9 posted on 09/24/2004 6:26:06 PM PDT by ClintonBeGone (Take the first step in the war on terror - defeat John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman

See ya!


10 posted on 09/24/2004 6:26:18 PM PDT by tapatio (Just an average American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman

All together now, team: it's disproved.

(Check your source and its author first, Newbie.)


11 posted on 09/24/2004 6:26:35 PM PDT by Chummy ("I Rather Know when I See BS." RepublicanAttackSquad.biz: "A vote 4 Kerry is a vote 4 Osama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman

12 posted on 09/24/2004 6:28:09 PM PDT by tapatio (Just an average American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman
Oh yeah, you're just trying to disprove it,

So sorry you couldn't stick around.

13 posted on 09/24/2004 6:28:49 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor (www.swiftvets.com: where the truth lives on, after 35 years of Kerry lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman
Tureeza, you need to keep an eye on your gigolo.

14 posted on 09/24/2004 6:29:06 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman
WOW is this helpful. Thanks for the post.

Everyone should spend time looking into this.

Your a great help to FR.

Keep up the wonerful posts.

What was John and Theresa wearing today?

15 posted on 09/24/2004 6:29:13 PM PDT by highpockets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman
AND WHEN DID YOU STOP BEATING YOUR WIFE, REAL INDEP MAN?  WHY THE HELL SHOULD ANYBODY HAVE TO PROVE A NEGATIVE?  THAT'S LIKE DEFINING BY NON-EXISTENCE (DIVIDING BY ZERO).  IT'S A TOTAL LOGICAL IRRELEVANCY BASED UPON A TOTAL LOGICAL FALLACY.  SO, OKAY, WHEN DID YOU STOP JERKING OFF AND START BEATING YOUR WIFE, ANYWAY?  AND PROVE YOU DIDN'T FALL OUT OF A SPACESHIP FROM THE SOUTH POLE OF URANUS, WHILE YOU'RE AT IT, JERK.
 
16 posted on 09/24/2004 6:33:19 PM PDT by FreeKeys (So SeeBS must think it's OK to plant evidence if you think -- or at least hope -- someone's guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

This is all I could find so far; where’s Congressman Billybob when we need him?

A TIMELINE OF DRUG TESTING IN THE UNITED STATES
From Nixon to Bush (both of them), each successive regime has made the Fourth Amendment a casualty in the Drug War.
2002-09-19
http://www.hightimes.com/ht/legal/content.php?bid=131&aid=3

1967 - Seeking election to the Presidency, candidate Richard Nixon declares law-and-order the number one goal of his proposed administration with special emphasis on a War on Drugs: "As I look over the problems in this country" he told supporters at Disneyland, "I see one that stands out particularly - the problem of narcotics."

"I believe in civil rights," Nixon averred. "But the first civil right of every American is to be free from violence, and we are going to have an administration that restores that right in the United States of America."

1969 -Washington, D.C. Department of Corrections tests the urine of 129 District prisoners in an effort to prove a casual relationship between crime and drugs. Since prisoners, by definition, have mitigated rights, no constitutional violation is cited. An imperfect study at best, the results are ambiguous and debatable.

1971 - Acting on recommendations from the White House, the Pentagon prepares to randomly drug test soldiers returning from Vietnam. Since drug use is an infraction of military code and automatically results in a dishonorable discharge, many servicemen would be placed in legal jeopardy, and the result would be a public relations nightmare. To solve the problem President Nixon - acting as commander-in-chief - sends a one-page memo to the secretary of defense ordering that drug use will no longer be considered a crime under the military code of justice. This single act reverses decades of military policy and simultaneously introduces random urine testing as a matter of public policy.

1975 - the U.S. Supreme Court declared constitutional an "administrative search exception" to the Fourth Amendment [Committee for GI Rights v. Callaway 518 F. 2D 466, 474 D.C. Cir. 1975] with regard to random drug testing of military personnel, reasoning that the state's strong public interest to ensure military readiness outweighs the privacy interests of servicemen who already serve under considerably diminished Fourth Amendment rights.


17 posted on 09/24/2004 6:37:04 PM PDT by Maria S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman
'Progressive' anything is a buzzword for "I'm an idiot, and I can't think for myself."
18 posted on 09/24/2004 6:41:03 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman
I need a team assist on disproving this. I believe USAF and ANG random drug testing did not begin until the 1980s

Why should we bother? This site is a waste of time.

19 posted on 09/24/2004 6:41:42 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Indepman

20 posted on 09/24/2004 6:42:36 PM PDT by wolicy_ponk (Kerry, follow me no closer than 1000 yards, or I'll teach you what a real purple heart is. -T.Peck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson