30 Years From Now (or A Question for Your Liberal Friends)

Freedom News ^ | September 16, 2004 | Tim Phares

[TBP]

We hear a lot in this Presidential campaign about 30-year-old events. People change a lot in 30 years, we're told, and that is true, although liberals certainly don't want us to think it's true about Bush. So let's have a little fun looking 30 years into the future, shall we?

Let's say that 30 years in the future, Pfc. Lynndee England, the girl in the Abu Ghraib photos, were to be a candidate for President. Would you consider supporting her? Or does Abu Ghraib reveal character failings that are disqualifying?

If your answer is that you would not support her, then why would you support John Kerry? The things he has admitted to doing -- cutting off heads, burning villages, and the like -- are far worse than anything Lynndee England has done. Yet liberals seem to regard Pfc. England as a vile person who must be stomped upon, but regard John Kerry as a hero.

More liberal logic.

[ladyinred]

Oh this is great. I suppose those of us of a certain age feel that JF'nK should never be anywhere near the White House, while the youth of this country are clueless that we object to an obvious traitor who went against his country and his fellow servicemen. Brilliant analogy.

[TBP]

Thank you.

[NYCVirago]

Yet liberals seem to regard Pfc. England as a vile person who must be stomped upon, but regard John Kerry as a hero.

Nah, I think that's conservatives who consider her vile. Liberals think she's a victim/scapegoat of Rummy's schemes, and was just doing what she was told.

[TBP]

Of course liberals view her as a vile person. She's in the U.S. military, and the only dcent person who has ever been in the U.S. military is John Fn. Kerry