Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

I only post this because I live 20 minutes from the crash site, and I do house calls for patients and have friends that live in this vacinity.

What I have heard locally is verified by this article, or this article verifies what I have heard from locals, for whatever its worth.

To us the most striking finding was the distance and volume of debris from the crash site, especially in New Baltimore.

President Bush and his team have the whole story. So why aren't they telling the rest of us?

If they had to shoot dowbn this plane, that's OK. It was necessary.

And they do not have to tell us if or why.

1 posted on 01/26/2003 9:28:47 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: *Catholic_list; .45MAN; AKA Elena; al_c; american colleen; Angelus Errare; Antoninus; ...
interesting article from British press...
2 posted on 01/26/2003 9:33:15 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
Our pilots realized that that they MIGHT have had to shoot Flight 93 down. They never did, though.

Unfortunately, the plane crashed as brave American passengers attempted to overtake the hijackers ---even though they knew, they probably were all going to die.

SEPTEMBER 11, 2001: ATTACK ON AMERICA! (A Comprehensive 9-11 Resource Online)
http://www.truthusa.com/911.html
3 posted on 01/26/2003 9:40:53 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp

 "Passenger Edward Felt made an emergency call 
   from the plane ... spoke of an explosion and 
   seeing some white smoke. 
 
Hmm he didn't say "Jesus - WE'VE BEEN HIT!" or
"Jesus  - SOMETHING JUST BLEW UP!"
 
Sorry, this doesn't wash ...

 
Geez ... remember a NUMBER of pasengers made calls via
the GTE Airfones on board that flight - and I suspect
that there were a couple of calls in progress DURING this
entire time (I would have made one myself - damn the 
three dollars a minute it would have cost me if I had 
lived!) period!
 
Anyway - it's NOT likely an appropriately placed 
air to air missile would have had negligible
effect and NOT made a loud noise ALSO hearable 
over the phone connection TO the guy on the 
ground ...
 
 
  "a one-ton section of the engine" 
 
What does that mean? A one-ton section?
 
Was it the turbine? Was it part of the external
turbine housing?
 
What kind of FORCE from an explosion results when
an airplane augers in at high speed? How mush debris 
is belched out - like when a rock hits water or an 
impact crater is made?
 
 
  "but at 9:22 am a sonic boom"
 
What happens when one starts mucking around with 
engine thrust on turbo fan engine - can you do
weird stuff like dump excess fuel into it and 
then shut-off-restart if you don't know what you 
are doing?

 
  "earthquake monitor in southern Pennsylvania"
 
Maybe this was because of something else - like the 
usual bachground noise from sources including truck
vibration of the ground ...
 
 
 "the last thing heard on the cockpit voice recorder 
  is the sound of wind"
 
I suspect this would NOT be the last sound heard 
on the CVR if they had been hit by an air to air 
missile. WHAT ABOUT THE SOUND OF AN EXPLOSION!!!!
 
  "less than 10 minutes flying time from 
   Washington. "
 
IF the goombas flying it KNEW which direction to
head, and, the FAA guys watching the ARSR's (Air
Route Surv. RADARs would have KNOWN this and 
would ALSO have seen the interceptors on their
scopes TOO. WAS THERE A CONSPIRACY TO SHUT THESE
GUYS UP?
 
- - - - - 
 
REALLY NICE conspiracy theories are usually wound 
around the SELECT PRESENTATION of just a FEW FACTS,
like the so-called 'facts' below.
 
Sort of like a trial where ALL you hear from is the
prosecution - or the defense!
 

9 posted on 01/26/2003 9:52:28 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
I have also assumed that the plane was shot down. The president, the pilot, would have no way of knowing there was a passengers' rebellion going down on board.

But if it was shot down, everyone involved should take this story to the grave.
12 posted on 01/26/2003 9:54:39 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp


There's the impact. No trails or anything. It was forced down by islamics.... And if it was shot down, why hide it? It had to be done anyway.
13 posted on 01/26/2003 9:56:24 PM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *WTC Attacks
ping
16 posted on 01/26/2003 10:03:04 PM PST by Coleus (RU 486 Kills Babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
"There's no way I imagined this plane - it was so low it was virtually on top of me. It was white with no markings but it was definitely military, it just had that look.

"It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side.

It was a Falcon 20.

18 posted on 01/26/2003 10:06:27 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
Greetings Polycarp, FReepers, et al:
Or - and this is proving to be the most uncomfortable question of all - in the moments before the airliner piled into the black, spongey earth at 575mph did an American fighter pilot have to do the unthinkable and shoot down a US civil airliner?

Seems there was a pilot's story posted from one the USAF or ANG pilots who scrambled for the hijacked airliners that day. Shoot down was not unthinkable, but embarrassingly impossible. The pilots report the fighter aircraft were unarmed September 11. (One big happy post-cold war new world order family.)

The pilot's takedown plan was to slice the hijacked aircraft wing off with the fighter aircraft wing in a daring midair collision. Rotating the fighter aircraft into a 90 degree tilt, then pulling the eject lever right before impact. Sure wish I knew where the story was.

20 posted on 01/26/2003 10:07:09 PM PST by OneLoyalAmerican (Convict pedophile wannabe traitor Ritter thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/829655/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp

Exactly so. Perhaps our great-grandchildren will hear the full story of Flight 93, but we do not have to.

29 posted on 01/26/2003 10:13:25 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
The thing is, even if the heroes were able to take control of the plane away from the hijackers and there were no jets around to possibly shoot it down, they were still goners because how would they be able to land it?
33 posted on 01/26/2003 10:18:52 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
So, let me get this straight. There is no US fighter that has a spoiler like on a car, with two engines and two upright tail fins.

So, the allegation is this: The US has an entirely secret, armed, warjet that it stations on call for air-to-air defense, instead of just using F-16's and F-15's?

Why would they do that? Eyewitness reports are exceedingly unreliable. That is not to say that these people are liars or anything, just that in times of stress people very often confuse time-frames and other information.

38 posted on 01/26/2003 10:22:31 PM PST by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp

WHAT HAPPENED TO FLIGHT 93:

The plane was hijacked. The passengers found out via their cell phones that this was no ordinary hijacking and they were all going to die. So the passengers rebelled and tried to take back control. They failed, but they did manage to at least cause the terrorists to lose control as well, and thus ensured the plane crashed somewhere where nobody else could be hurt. The end.

Remember that The Mirror is massively, totally, virulently anti-Bush, anti-Blair and anti-war. (And they've lost between 6 and 10% of their entire circulation, since they decided to position the paper as a liberal hate-based rag after 9/11.)

If you need a little more convincing, here's Monday morning's Daily Mirror cover:

In case you can't make it out, that's a photo of the newspaper projecting a giant anti-war image onto the side of Parliament.

51 posted on 01/26/2003 10:29:55 PM PST by Timesink (I offered her a ring, she gave me the finger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
At least SIX witnesses, including Susan Mcelwain saw a small military type plane flying around shortly BEFORE UA93 crashed. The FBI denies its existence.

Standard FBI operational procedure.

Passenger Edward Felt made an emergency call from the plane. He spoke of an explosion and seeing some white smoke. The superviser who took the call has been gagged by the FBI.

Standard FBI operational procedure.

The FBI insists there was no military plane in the area but at 9.22am a sonic boom - caused by a supersonic jet - was picked up by an earthquake monitor in southern Pennsylvania, 60 miles away from Shanksville.

Standard FBI operational procedure.

58 posted on 01/26/2003 10:33:53 PM PST by judgeandjury (The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
Greetings Polycarp, FReepers, et al:
A section of engine weighing a ton was located 2,000 yards - over a mile -from the crash site. Theorists point out a Sidewinder heat-seeking missile attacks the hottest part of aircraft - the engine.
More bovine excrement. Just a small bolt passing through the compressor vanes utterly destroys a gas turbine engine. And we are supposed to believe a heat-seeking missile leaves the engine intact.
86 posted on 01/26/2003 11:18:58 PM PST by OneLoyalAmerican (Convict pedophile wannabe traitor Ritter thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/829655/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
From The Post-Gazette News-September 16, 2001:

2 planes had no part in crash of Flight 93

Two other airplanes were flying near the hijacked United Airlines jet when it crashed in Somerset County, but neither had anything to do with the airliner's fate, the FBI said yesterday.

In fact, one of the planes, a Fairchild Falcon 20 business jet, was directed to the crash site to help rescuers. The request for the jet to fly low and obtain the coordinates for the crash explains reports by people in the vicinity who said a white or silver jet flew by moments after the crash.

A C-130 military cargo plane was also within 25 miles of the passenger jet when it crashed, FBI spokesman Bill Crowley said yesterday, but was not diverted.

"There was a hole in the ground -- that was it," said Yates Caldwell, the pilot who was at the controls of the 10-passenger corporate jet for Greensboro, N.C.-based apparel maker VF Corp. "There was no way to know what it was .... I didn't know there had been a crash until I landed, until I was on the ground in Johnstown."


98 posted on 01/26/2003 11:45:39 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
The Truth
112 posted on 01/27/2003 10:14:15 AM PST by Voice in your head (Nuke Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
I would have had no problem with the US shooting down this plane. I do have a problem with a coverup.


152 posted on 02/11/2003 10:20:58 AM PST by Mr. K (all your (OPTIONAL TAG LINE) are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson