Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHAT DID HAPPEN TO FLIGHT 93?
mirror.co.uk ^ | 1/27/03 | RICHARD WALLACE

Posted on 01/26/2003 9:28:46 PM PST by Polycarp

WHAT DID HAPPEN TO FLIGHT 93?

RICHARD WALLACE, US Editor, examines riddle of hijacked jet as he visits crash site

THE unmarked military-style jet swooped down at high speed through the valley, twice circled the smouldering black scar where Flight 93 had careered into the ground just seconds earlier and then hurtled off over the horizon.

GRIEF: Victims' relatives visit a makeshift memorial at crash site

At least six eyewitnesses saw the mysterious aircraft on the morning of September 11 last year. But the US authorities deny it ever existed.

So when George Bush laid a wreath yesterday at the crash site in a remote valley outside Shanksville, Pennsylvania, he was one of only a handful of people who know what really happened to the 40 innocents and four hijackers aboard the doomed United Airlines Boeing 757-200.

Those unimaginable final seconds as passengers showed courageous defiance apparently wrestling for control of the aircraft have become one of the defining images of the tragedy.

And "Let's roll" - ringleader Todd Beamer's no-nonsense call to arms - became a defining battle cry in America's war on terror.

But of the four aircraft taken on September 11, the exact fate of Flight 93 after its two-hour journey is proving difficult for US officials to explain.

What was the white jet doing there and why won't they admit to its presence? Why did other witnesses see smoke and flames trailing from Flight 93 as it fell from the sky, indicating a possible explosion aboard?

Or - and this is proving to be the most uncomfortable question of all - in the moments before the airliner piled into the black, spongey earth at 575mph did an American fighter pilot have to do the unthinkable and shoot down a US civil airliner?

Susan Mcelwain, 51, who lives two miles from the site, knows what she saw - the white plane rocketed directly over her head.

"It came right over me, I reckon just 40 or 50ft above my mini-van," she recalled. "It was so low I ducked instinctively. It was travelling real fast, but hardly made any sound.

"Then it disappeared behind some trees. A few seconds later I heard this great explosion and saw this fireball rise up over the trees, so I figured the jet had crashed. The ground really shook. So I dialled 911 and told them what happened.

"I'd heard nothing about the other attacks and it was only when I got home and saw the TV that I realised it wasn't the white jet, but Flight 93.

Ididn't think much more about it until the authorities started to say there had been no other plane. The plane I saw was heading right to the point where Flight 93 crashed and must have been there at the very moment it came down.

"There's no way I imagined this plane - it was so low it was virtually on top of me. It was white with no markings but it was definitely military, it just had that look.

"It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side. I haven't found one like it on the internet. It definitely wasn't one of those executive jets. The FBI came and talked to me and said there was no plane around.

"Then they changed their story and tried to say it was a plane taking pictures of the crash 3,000ft up.

"But I saw it and it was there before the crash and it was 40ft above my head. They did not want my story - nobody here did."

Mrs Mcelwain, who looks after special needs children, is further convinced the whole truth has yet to come out because of a phone call she had within hours from the wife of an air force friend of the family.

"She said her husband had called her that morning and said 'I can't talk, but we've just shot a plane down,' " Susan said. "I presumed they meant Flight 93. I have no doubt those brave people on board tried to do something, but I don't believe what happened on the plane brought it down.

"If they shot it down, or something else happened, everyone, especially the victims' families, have a right to know."

Lee Purbaugh, 32, was the only person to see the last seconds of Flight 93 as it came down on former strip-mining land at precisely 10.06am - and he also saw the white jet.

He was working at the Rollock Inc. scrapyard on a ridge overlooking the point of impact, less than half a mile away. "I heard this real loud noise coming over my head," he told the Daily Mirror. "I looked up and it was Flight 93, barely 50ft above me. It was coming down in a 45 degree and rocking from side to side. Then the nose suddenly dipped and it just crashed into the ground. There was this big fireball and then a huge cloud of smoke."

But did he see another plane? "Yes, there was another plane," Lee said. "I didn't get a good look but it was white and it circled the area about twice and then it flew off over the horizon."

Tom Spinelli, 28, was working at India Lake Marina, a mile and a half away. "I saw the white plane," he said.

"It was flying around all over the place like it was looking for something. I saw it before and after the crash."

India Lake also contributes to the view there was an explosion on board before the Newark-San Francisco flight came down. Debris rained down on the lake - a curious feat if, as the US government insists, there was no mid-air explosion and the plane was intact until it hit the ground.

"It was mainly mail, bits of in-flight magazine and scraps of seat cloth," Tom said. "The authorities say it was blown here by the wind." But there was only a 10mph breeze and you were a mile and a half away? Tom raised his eyebrows, rolled his eyes and said: "Yeah, that's what they reckon."

Light debris was also found eight miles away in New Baltimore. A section of engine weighing a ton was located 2,000 yards - over a mile -from the crash site. Theorists point out a Sidewinder heat-seeking missile attacks the hottest part of aircraft - the engine.

The authorities say the impact bounced it there. But the few pieces of surviving fuselage, local coroner Wallace Miller told us, were "no bigger than a carrier bag".

Nearly all the passengers were reduced to charcoal on impact and the largest piece of human tissue found was a section of spine eight inches long.

CURIOUSLY, military officials insist there was never any pursuit of Flight 93, although they were informed that it was a suspected hijack at 9.16am, 50 minutes before the plane came down.

At 9.35am they assumed it was heading for Washington DC after it changed course in a 180 degree turn and three F-16s - top speed 1,800mph - now patrolling over the capital were told to "protect the White House at all costs".

An anonymous flight controller said on the day that an F-16 was "in hot pursuit" of Flight 93 - Washington to Shanksville is seven to 10 minutes flying time.

A few minutes before the crash Bill Wright, piloting a single-engine Piper, could see Flight 93 three miles away, but was suddenly told to turn away and land immediately without explanation.

At 9.58am a 911 call - the last mobile phone contact from Flight 93 - was made from one of the airliner's toilets by passenger Edward Felt.

Glenn Cramer, the emergency supervisor who answered it, said on the day: "He was very distraught. He said he believed the plane was going down.

"He did hear some sort of an explosion and saw white smoke coming from the plane, but he didn't know where. And then we lost contact with him." Glenn Cramer has now been gagged by the FBI.

Also, according to sources, the last seconds of the cockpit voice recorder are the loud sounds of wind, hinting at a possible hole somewhere in the fuselage. What caused the smoke and explosion? Why the wind sounds?

The FBI's later explanation for the white jet was that a passing civilian Fairchild Falcon 20 jet was asked to descend from 34,000ft to 5,000ft some minutes after the crash to give co-ordinates for the site. The plane and pilot have never been produced or identified. Susan Mcelwain says a Falcon 20 was not the plane she saw.

FURTHER verification that some kind of military aircraft was operating in the area is scientifically irrefutable.

At 9.22am a sonic boom - caused by supersonic flight - was picked up by an earthquake monitoring station in southern Pennsylvania, 60 miles from Shanksville.

That Todd Beamer and others launched an assault on the hijackers there is no doubt. The brief extracts released from audio tapes indicate a fierce struggle going on at the cockpit door.

But nobody - official or otherwise - has categorically said the group got into the cockpit or that their actions led to the crash. Those final, agonising moments are mere presumption.

President Bush and his team have the whole story. So why aren't they telling the rest of us?

UA93: THE EVIDENCE

THE WITNESSES

At least SIX witnesses, including Susan Mcelwain saw a small military type plane flying around shortly BEFORE UA93 crashed. The FBI denies its existence

THE DEBRIS

The US Government insists the plane exploded on impact yet a one-ton section of the engine was found over a mile away and other light debris was found scattered over eight miles away

THE MOBILE CALL

Passenger Edward Felt made an emergency call from the plane. He spoke of an explosion and seeing some white smoke. The superviser who took the call has been gagged by the FBI

THE F-16s

UA93 was identified as a hijack at 9.16am. At 9.35am three F-16s were ordered to "protect the White House at all costs" when it turned towards the capital. At 10.06am it crashed at Shanksville, less than 10mins flying time from Washington

THE BLACK BOXS

Sources claim the last thing heard on the cockpit voice recorder is the sound of wind - suggesting the plane had been holed

THE SONIC BOOM

The FBI insists there was no military plane in the area but at 9.22am a sonic boom - caused by a supersonic jet - was picked up by an earthquake monitor in southern Pennsylvania, 60 miles away from Shanksville.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; flight93; wtcattacks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-152 next last
To: OneLoyalAmerican
It seems the eyewitness Flight 93 story get embellished each it's retold.
*It seems the eyewitness Flight 93 story get embellished each time it's retold.
81 posted on 01/26/2003 11:03:28 PM PST by OneLoyalAmerican (Convict pedophile wannabe traitor Ritter thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/829655/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: OneLoyalAmerican
the eyewitness Flight 93 story

Actually, what I see related in this story is the same as I've heard locally from day one.

The only new items are the siesmic data and this:

At 9.58am a 911 call - the last mobile phone contact from Flight 93 - was made from one of the airliner's toilets by passenger Edward Felt.

Glenn Cramer, the emergency supervisor who answered it, said on the day: "He was very distraught. He said he believed the plane was going down.

"He did hear some sort of an explosion and saw white smoke coming from the plane, but he didn't know where. And then we lost contact with him." Glenn Cramer has now been gagged by the FBI.

Also, according to sources, the last seconds of the cockpit voice recorder are the loud sounds of wind, hinting at a possible hole somewhere in the fuselage. What caused the smoke and explosion? Why the wind sounds?

Otherwise, I'd say you are incorrect. The eyewitness accounts have not changed from what I've heard locally since 9/11/02.

Are you a local too? Otherwise how do you know they've been embellished?

82 posted on 01/26/2003 11:08:30 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
jettisoned to FR's version of Siberia

At least this one wasn't exiled to the Religion Forum ghetto...

83 posted on 01/26/2003 11:10:20 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp; Jeff Head; dead; aristeides; monkey; 2sheep; abner; Wallaby; mancini; thinden
I can't believe this discussion has been relegated to the smokey backroom....

Just thought I'd express my opinion and let you see what happened with this article discussion.
84 posted on 01/26/2003 11:13:48 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Thank you for posting the article. Many of the FReepers who posted here are not aware of the local accounts. I don't think that it is 'tinfoil' time to discuss this article (in light of the eyewitness accounts that were reported in the Somerset area).
85 posted on 01/26/2003 11:17:00 PM PST by PennsylvaniaMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Greetings Polycarp, FReepers, et al:
A section of engine weighing a ton was located 2,000 yards - over a mile -from the crash site. Theorists point out a Sidewinder heat-seeking missile attacks the hottest part of aircraft - the engine.
More bovine excrement. Just a small bolt passing through the compressor vanes utterly destroys a gas turbine engine. And we are supposed to believe a heat-seeking missile leaves the engine intact.
86 posted on 01/26/2003 11:18:58 PM PST by OneLoyalAmerican (Convict pedophile wannabe traitor Ritter thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/829655/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz; Admin Moderator; Sidebar Moderator; Jim Robinson
I can't believe this discussion has been relegated to the smokey backroom....

Me neither.

Any explanation, mods?

Could it be restored to the News forum? This is a legit discussion. It is no bad mark on the White House if the premise of this story is true...quite the opposite. It would indicate we have adults who understand difficult realities in the White House.

87 posted on 01/26/2003 11:20:52 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
For what it's worth... I've held hope, since 9/11, that Flight 93's demise was solely a result of the actions of it's passengers. That's what I want to believe. The thought that any of our Service members would have had to put an end to this flight is heartbreaking but it's also a valid possibility. These men (and women), who protect us on a daily basis, should never have had to be in this type of situation yet they most likely were. The infighting about "did they/didn't they" is not helpful. Should we learn that the military did, indeed, have to shoot down a passenger plane... who benefits from that knowledge?
88 posted on 01/26/2003 11:21:48 PM PST by hmmmmm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: OneLoyalAmerican
A section of engine weighing a ton was located 2,000 yards - over a mile -from the crash site.

More bovine excrement.

This crash site was excavated like the strip mine where it occured. The piece were buried in the soft earth, up to 45 feet deep, and had to be literally dug up. There was hardly even a fire.

I don't have a problem with your refutation of the missile theory, and agree with your analysis in this regard.

However, could you please explain how the 2000 lb piece of engine ended up over a mile from the rest of the completely buried plane crash remains?

How about a little less patronizing arrogance, OK?

89 posted on 01/26/2003 11:26:11 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Is smokey backroom bad?
90 posted on 01/26/2003 11:28:26 PM PST by OneLoyalAmerican (Convict pedophile wannabe traitor Ritter thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/829655/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: hmmmmm
Should we learn that the military did, indeed, have to shoot down a passenger plane... who benefits from that knowledge?

This info has been made public in the domestic and foreign press.

Do we ignore it?

It accurately relates what has been known locally since 9/11.

I do not know where the "right to know" regarding a 2 year old attack ends, and morally appropriate silence begins.

91 posted on 01/26/2003 11:29:20 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
However, could you please explain how the 2000 lb piece of engine ended up over a mile from the rest of the completely buried plane crash remains?

It's entirely possible that during the cockpit fight for control of the plane, the airplane went through maneuvers that put stresses on the fuselage far beyone what it designed to withstand, and it simply fell off.

In any case, when a plane's going ~500mph at the point of impact, finding a piece of the wreckage a single mile away from the main impact zone is not merely possible, it's to be expected.

92 posted on 01/26/2003 11:31:15 PM PST by Timesink (I offered her a ring, she gave me the finger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: PennsylvaniaMom; Askel5
I don't think that it is 'tinfoil' time to discuss this article (in light of the eyewitness accounts that were reported in the Somerset area).

Neither do I. What was most striking was the accuracy and consistency of this reporter's story with what has been said locally consistently since 9/11.

93 posted on 01/26/2003 11:33:45 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: OneLoyalAmerican
Is smokey backroom bad?

It's the place for Discussions That Never End, threads on topics so controversial that they almost instantly devolve into pissing matches that will never, ever be settled. Such as this one.

94 posted on 01/26/2003 11:34:27 PM PST by Timesink (I offered her a ring, she gave me the finger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Now this is the kind of explanation I had hoped to see. Good analysis. Thank you.
95 posted on 01/26/2003 11:35:01 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
re post No 5: "More happened here than we have been told."

Now Polycarp, I'm not into conspiracy theories. It is know that shooting down Flight 93 MIGHT have to be an option, but it never happened because the plane crashed first. IF someone has evidence that the military pilots and the government officials are lying about the Flight 93 incident; please post it here. Source your information please. Thank you.

96 posted on 01/26/2003 11:39:24 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Re Post No.11: "The public is much better embracing the "hero" story of Flight 93 in any case."

I disagree with you. The non-pc, non-brain dead, THINKING public can handle the truth --- whatever the truth is. If you have evidence that we shot down Flight 93; then please post your evidence and source your information. Thank you.
97 posted on 01/26/2003 11:43:13 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
From The Post-Gazette News-September 16, 2001:

2 planes had no part in crash of Flight 93

Two other airplanes were flying near the hijacked United Airlines jet when it crashed in Somerset County, but neither had anything to do with the airliner's fate, the FBI said yesterday.

In fact, one of the planes, a Fairchild Falcon 20 business jet, was directed to the crash site to help rescuers. The request for the jet to fly low and obtain the coordinates for the crash explains reports by people in the vicinity who said a white or silver jet flew by moments after the crash.

A C-130 military cargo plane was also within 25 miles of the passenger jet when it crashed, FBI spokesman Bill Crowley said yesterday, but was not diverted.

"There was a hole in the ground -- that was it," said Yates Caldwell, the pilot who was at the controls of the 10-passenger corporate jet for Greensboro, N.C.-based apparel maker VF Corp. "There was no way to know what it was .... I didn't know there had been a crash until I landed, until I was on the ground in Johnstown."


98 posted on 01/26/2003 11:45:39 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
I do not know where the "right to know" regarding a 2 year old attack ends, and morally appropriate silence begins.

I don't know either and I'm not questioning the validity of anything you've said. Perhaps, in this case, the "morally appropriate silence" is personal.... there's no right or wrong answer.

99 posted on 01/26/2003 11:50:55 PM PST by hmmmmm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Greetings Polycarp:
Are you a local too? Otherwise how do you know they've been embellished?
No, I’m not from the area. However, I’m quite used to embellished stories, being a fire/rescue type. Often, I've wondered if I was at the same incident, just a week later. :)
100 posted on 01/26/2003 11:56:05 PM PST by OneLoyalAmerican (Convict pedophile wannabe traitor Ritter thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/829655/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson