Posted on 10/18/2001 9:48:56 PM PDT by VinnyTex
Islams Hatred of the Clitoris FrontPageMagazine.com | October 19, 2001
IF YOU HATE WOMEN, and you hate their sexuality, and you are terrified that you cannot control it, the most effective thing you can do is to mutilate female sexual pleasure. This can be done by a sexual lobotomy, which will destroy an essential and sacred part of a womans natural makeup. In achieving this feat on all women, you will become able to ruthlessly dominate them.
Thats what female circumcision is all about. Its about obliterating the clitoris, or the entire outer vagina. It is the barbarity that exists where misogyny festers most: in the Muslim and African world. The Muslims are the principal religious group that practice female circumcision. In Egypt, for instance, 97 percent of women are circumcised. Their clitorises are amputated. In countries like Sudan, meanwhile, the women-haters are not so kind: all the womens external genital organs are completely removed. In a savagery called infibulation, the clitoris, the two major outer lips (labia majora) and the two minor inner lips (labia minora) are amputated. Nawal El Saadawi has documented these horrifying realities in The Hidden Face of Eve: Women in the Arab World. She demonstrates how the violence of female circumcision is performed on girls anywhere from the ages of one month to puberty. Usually, it is done around the age of seven or eight. Anesthetics are never used. The child is pinned down by several women, while one of them attacks. After infibulation, the small outer opening of the vagina is the only portion left intact. A tiny piece of wood or reed is inserted to allow urine and menstrual blood to seep out. Extra narrowing of the opening is carried out with stitches, which remain until marriage. The victims legs are often bound together from hip to ankle and she is immobile for about a month or two. This violence has to occur because, in much of the Islamic world, the females genital area is considered dirty and unacceptable. For example, in Egypt the uncircumcised girl is called nigsa (unclean). Thus, it has to be made "clean." Many of the victims lose their lives during this torture which is often inflicted with broken glass. Many other victims are afflicted with acute and chronic infections for the rest of their lives. With serious and disabling lifelong consequences, the mutilation robs women of their equilibrium. It deprives them from enjoying the fullness of their sexuality and the completeness of their lives. In terms of sexual pleasure, for instance, we know that approximately 75 percent of women cannot achieve orgasm without clitoral stimulation. In other words, the possibility of orgasm has been obliterated for tens of millions of women in the Muslim world. So what does it mean if the psychic, mental and physical health of women cannot be complete if they do not experience sexual pleasure? The terror of the circumcision itself tracks its traumatized victims down like a nightmare. Most, if not all, of these poor women end up suffering from serious sexual and/or mental distortions. The mutilation of their sexual being becomes the epicenter where sex and violence meet constantly in their lives with them as victims. Wedding night is often quite eventful. In some parts of the Arab and African world, the husband assaults the wife after the wedding. In Somalia, for instance, the groom beats the bride with a leather whip. After this romantic apex, he cuts the sealed vagina with a sharp scalpel or razor in order to have intercourse. He then has prolonged repeated intercourse with her for a week to prevent the scarring from closing the vaginal opening again. During this time the wife must lie still and not move. Meanwhile, the husband takes the bloody sharp object, which represents the virginity of his wife, and makes rounds around the community showing it off for approval. Scholars such as Raphael Patai and Vincent Crapanzano have documented these phenomena. After this honeymoon period, the woman is now, for the first time in her life, actually recognized as a person because she has become the extension of her husband. Her status might even improve if she has a child (a boy). She will be humiliated and shamed, however, if she has a non-child (a girl). And if a little innocent girl enters this world, it will only be a short time before her genitals share the same fate as that of her mothers. When the torturers and soul-destroyers begin to slice, who will hear her cries? |
|
A more correct analogy would be to say it is like cutting off your fingernails.
This genital mutiliation crap is an African cultural artifact-- drawn out of their ancient tribal practices.
This is not part of any Islamic tradition that I'm aware of. And having been with women from that part of the world ( in the Biblical sense), I can state this with some confidence.
It's pathetic that some here equate this to a religious practice.
I don't know if the practice of infibulation makes a culture more murderous, but I'm sure it doesn't make them more passive toward the "uncut".
Circumcision is in the Bible. You might like it or not believe in it but it is definitely there. Oh, and the Bible mentions that Jesus himself was circumcised.
I have to disagree with you that circumcision is not painful for infants. My son was born at home and circumcised at home, at 8 days of age (doctor said blood clots better between 7-10 days of birth). I had to hold my son while this was done to him. IT WAS NOT ANYWHERE NEAR PAINLESS!
Sorry. She doesn't compare to Lotta Topp.
I was circumcised as a baby and I REMEMBER no pain at all. I am sure this also holds true for all the other men who were circumcised shortly after birth. However, if you wait until you are an adult to be circumcised you will feel a lot of pain and it will last for weeks.
How did Imam escape female circumcision? Wasn't she born in Africa?
This is not part of any Islamic tradition that I'm aware of.
So why don't Muslim clerics CONDEMN it? Can't they excommunicate (or whatever they call it) any African Muslim who condones this practice?
HaHaHa...nobody will be able to top that one.
The problem with the Taliban is that their partners are often young boys. Perhaps we should airdrop NAMBLA membership cards on those perverts.
You just contradicted yourself. Either your son remembers the pain or not. The fact is he WON'T if circumcision is performed shortly after birth. If he waits until he is grown up it will be very painful and he will remember. And he won't be too happy with you either.
Was she also horrified to hear little boys screaming when they were slapped on the face to get them breathing? The fact is that circumcision at that age is no more painful. I've been whipped with a belt by my Dad on occasion and that was much more painful than a circumcision that I can't even remember.
The Taliban.
You just contradicted yourself.
I din't contradict myself. I said it is a painful procedure but if preformed while an infant. they won't remember it.
And those Third World countries still have the nerve to crybaby about how "horrible" colonialism was? It sounds like colonialism was a pretty good thing for a lot of women because it prohibited that barbaric practice. No matter how bad things were under colonialism it didn't come near to the brutality of the barbaric practices in parts of the Third World.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.