Nope.
The progs think their propaganda is the correct information when it is not.
It is actually just the prog narrative of the lamestream "news" that their conformation bias leads them to.
.
Epstein cocaine must be good at politico
Yes, because Epstein killed himself ..
One group, MSM
“We Found the One Group of Americans Who Are Most Likely to Spread Fake News”
Federal employees?
Avenatti’s listening.
What is fake news?
Fake news uses terms like “disinformation” and “misinformation” without defining these terms or revealing exactly what falls under each of these umbrellas.
As far as I can tell, this article uses “disinformation” and “misinformation” interchangeably to mean anything that falls outside of authoritarian orthodoxy.
Nope.
The progs think their propaganda is the correct information when it is not.
It is actually just the prog narrative of the lamestream "news" that their conformation bias leads them to.
.
Politico calls other people disinformation specialists. Some of the biggest liars and partisans anywhere write for that hack outfit.
“Physician, heal thyself!”
The Main Stream Media.
Always has been.
Fakebook being a close second but MSM has the weight of decades of practice.
The FBI and other three letter agencies?
MSM employees..
Whomever conducted the study had to define “disinformation.”
How could they determine the exact truth and define it?
How could they avoid using a political lens in their definitions?
This doesn’t sound like a valid “study” to me, without answers to those questions.
Is this the new ‘deplorable’?
“In newly published research...” “Our findings suggest...” “Yet, our findings also showed...” “existing research has found...”
Their research was SO unscientific, but obviously factual?
From Politico. The far left further establishes itself as the center and demonizes those who hold different views.
"LCCs" ... yeah, that's the ticket.
Hmm, could it be these ivory tower researchers are confusing logically reasoned narratives with "misinformation"? Could it be the group that these geeks seem predisposed (how scientific) to scapegoat were the more discerning group of the four - this group knows relevant and valuable, but suppressed, information is when they see it?
“Low-conscientiousness Conservatives” (LCCs).
When you’re losing, keep shoveling terms no one cares about, understands, or believes. Then ask to be paid for it. Nitwits. Whatsamatta? “Knuckle-draggers” wasn’t a good enough stereotype?
I didn’t read their study and don’t intend to, but generally low-conscientiousness aligns with leftism. There should be some LC conservatives, but that number should be quite low. Or, they are using a different definiton of conservatism - think old-timey southern democrats.
The Ministry of Propaganda needs better gaslighters.
ROFLMAO... politico, belongs in outhouse-ho