Posted on 02/26/2014 7:33:18 AM PST by Seizethecarp
Shrimpton reported Obama's purported mom was not pregnant in 1961 and that Obama was born in Kenya in 1960. He said Kenya was under British intelligence files and that Obama's father ran guns for the Mau Mau. He then dropped a bombshell claiming the CIA did covert DNA testing on Obama at a fundraising dinner and the test came back with no match to the claimed grandparents. Shrimpton said Rudy Giuliani's people knew and sat on the intelligence and further stated he spoke with Hillary Clinton's people and that they were quite interested.
(Excerpt) Read more at birtherreport.com ...
Why you damned...you’re a...trying to look for one word that describes what a piece....why you damned CONSERVATIVE!
Maybe the ranks are getting nervous about the state of the country.
Could it also be from a hairbrush, cig butt, drinking glass?
Oh, hell, I've been outed!
Please, don't tell anyone!
What about Stanley’s friend in Seattle who they claim saw Stanley with a newborn whose diapers she barely knew how to change? Stanley was enrolling in the University of Washington. I thought this was summer of 1961.
GOP = GIVINGO OBAMA POWER
courtesy of EXEMPT Issa,
EXEMPT Boehner, &
EXEMPT McConnell.
The “blue pants” is a very disturbing mental image... yuk.
It would not be some big deal for CIA to get a DNA sample from nobama’s reported Mammy considering she was obviously a CIA operative in Indonesia.
But at this point WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE, to quote hitlery. There is zero chance of impeachment simply because of his skin color. We are pretty much stuck with the turd.
“But here’s what I can’t figure out. If Hillary had evidence of this in 2008, why didn’t she let it leak? The woman is power-hungry, and ruthless. I can’t imagine she’d just sit on it.”
Because the powers that be who put the man in office must be powerful enough to have her permanently silenced...if ya know what I mean....and she knows it.
Because the libprogs would not tolerate a cow attacking a sacred cow.
At that point, one libprog saying anything, ANYTHING, bad about obama, would have resulted in a bloodletting of unimaginable proportions.
And if a republican had done the same, he/she would have been attacked by the same bunch of stupid idiot so-called "fellow" republicans that voted for obama because "it was the right thing to do", or some other equally inane and stupid bullshit.
Look in the archives.
It occurred on a daily basis right here on this forum.
Otherwise intelligent and good people slashing their own throats in a orgiastic frenzy because they now had a chance to show how "aware" they could be.
I submit that "they" now know just how damned "aware" they really are.
Fools, one and all.
Could be, that 0 and handlers had dirt on shrillary.
And could be, they told her that they knew, and would act if she spilled the beans.
I’m starting to listen to the 1 hr 33 min long version of this video compilation for more hints on when it was done and who was there who would have known about these claims.
There are at least two separate events cobbled together to make the 7 minute version.
At the very beginning of the long video Shrimpton says that Medvedev is “about to win” election, which occurred on March 2, 2008, so this portion of the video would have been late February 2008.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dmitry_Medvedev
“The 2008 presidential election, held on 2 March 2008, was won by Medvedev with 70.28% of the popular vote, and he was inaugurated on 7 May 2008.”
Shrimpton also jokes that “we’ve had excellent snow this winter” frustrating global warmists and indicating that enough of the winter had passed to make this judgment, as would be true in late February 2008.
“At this stage, I wonder if anything would be done even if Obama held a press conference and announced he was foreign born and not a US citizen...”
No.
The reason is under the Constitution, once a President is sworn in (without regard to how he got to that point)the only way to remove a “sworn-in President” is through impeachment or resignation of course. Neither are likely to occur.
Shrimpton’s blog:
http://theshrimptonreport.blogspot.com/
and email: michael@mshrimpton.co.uk
And could be, they told her that they knew, and would act if she spilled the beans.
To: null and voidIn my mind’s eye I cansee the meeting:
Hillary produces proof 0bama was born in Kenya.
Obama shows Hillary proof of a fraction of her felonies.
What’s the worst that could have happened to 0bama?
He declares that he was always told he was born in Hawaii, and had never been informed of the true circumstances of his birth, apologizes, and then he gracefully steps down and goes back to being a senator.
What’s the worst that could still happen to Hillary!™?
If 1/10th of the rumors are true, She’d be facing being stripped of all her congressional perks, serious jail time and perhaps even the death penalty.
In this show-down, guess who blinks...
10 posted on Mon Feb 8 09:00:00 2010 by null and void (We are now in day 382 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
Exactly.
I hear people invoking the Supreme Court and the Justice Department over this but I don’t know of any legal authority they have to challenge the sitting POTUS’s legality to serve.
As you say, even if the “smoking gun” were found there’s little to nothing that would come of it. Not that I like that but it’s just the reality of it. Is CNN or MSNBC or any other major media outlet going to go full 24/7 hair on fire if it were to happen? No. I really can’t put much stock in the birther thing because regardless of what they might be able to provide it won’t result in anything. Hate it, but....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.