Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OBAMA'S BORDER TROUBLES (The "Death Blow" to Obama's COLB fraud)
TheDrRJP Channel ^ | 07/31/2010 | Dr. Ron Polland

Posted on 07/31/2010 9:37:35 PM PDT by Polarik

OBAMA'S BORDER TROUBLES (The "Death Blow" to Obama's COLB fraud)

Play that "funky border," white boy... Ever wonder how or why that UGLY, GRAYISH-GREEN BORDER wound up on Obama's 2007 COLB? I mean, besides it being a forgery. Well, wonder no longer. After two years of research and testing - and a few thousand combinations of multiple image parameters - here are the answers to HOW and WHY this BOMBASTIC BORDER was made.

Believe it or not, even a few, staunch Obama supporters found the border to be "Fishy," "Suspicious," "Unrealistic," and "Something a decent Forger would never do."

On the contrary, the Forger who made this Border was both decent and devilishly clever. He or she fabricated a border unlike any other, and unable to be discerned or duplicated by anyone. Until now, that is. As you will see from my latest video, It took a lot of time to do the crime (of document fraud). Like the three other instructional videos on my channel, I have assembled a set of step-by-step instructions on how to recreate this border. As you perform the rather complex process of replicating the border, or just watching the steps unfold, it should be self-evident that this border could only have been made by a human, and not a scanner. Obama's Border Troubles is the fourth and final installment in the set of instructional videos that I have provided for accurately recreating the Obama COLB forgery.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fxd0kQla3FA

http://www.youtube.com/TheDrRJP

 

 

 


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Food; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; fraud; lucassmithpartdeux; naturalborncitizen; polarik
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-295 next last
To: MestaMachine; Polarik; Danae

Lol. Now, that was a beaut. Polarik, I want you to think very, very carefully over those three little words:

Interstate communicated threats.

Look them up, even. You’re so far up sh*t creek you should be able to smell it in your sleep.


141 posted on 08/04/2010 1:43:24 AM PDT by Hardraade (I want gigaton warheads now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine; Danae; LorenC
He can't respond right now...he's working on his new book...


142 posted on 08/04/2010 6:52:28 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Polarik; All

It occurred to me that of polarik acts true to form, he either will, or already has, pinged his army to tell them that somehow Danae and I set him up. So I went back through my own Freepmail to find my last communication with Danae before polarik freepmailed her THIS time.
It was to congratulate her for an article she wrote for The Washington Examiner in OCTOBER of 2009.
Don’t think she will mind if I post it since I sent it.

Re: Obama’s Achilles heel - Natural Born Citizenship
To Danae | 10/15/2009 7:30:54 PM PDT sent
Well, I’ll be damned! Good on ya!!!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2363369/posts

Obama’s Achilles heel - Natural Born Citizenship
Examiner.com ^ | 10-15-2009 | Dianna Cotter

Posted on Thursday, October 15, 2009 5:13:26 PM by Danae

This is my own work, I own any associated copyrights to it.

... What is a Natural Born Citizen? ...
***********************************

I also asked her to help me alert people about what was happening to our Troops under McChrystal. Polarik was NOT the topic of conversation.
Until now, I have had no other communication with Danae and I did not initiate the LAST one. Polarik did. She did not know about this thread, and since the SUBJECT was supposed to be the document NOT her, I deliberately did NOT ping her for exactly the reason you see here.
This is about Polarik, not Danae. I questioned his expertise because he FALSELY claimed proof that a genuine COLB was a forgery and made the whole thing about Danae’s loyalty, just like he did now. It isn’t about Danae. It’s about him.
Danae had no knowledge of this thread and I MUST apologize to her because knowing what he did the last time, I should have seen it coming. A man with honor simply does NOT do these things. I gave him way too much credit. He has no honor and I would not believe a single word he said if he was standing on top of Mt. Sinai because he would probably proclaim the Ten Commandments were forged.
I was a little surprised when I heard from Danae this time telling me she did not want her personal information posted.
I am supposing she read the thread after Polarik contacted her because when I came back to the thread, this is what it had devolved into...because he lied. He could not take any heat on himself, so he made it all about Danae. THIS is pathetic and evil.
He claimed...falsely, that I had insisted he post her personal information and that he had informed me...on THIS thread, that he would not do it because he was an honorable man. He then went on to tell her to tell ME to back off.
I guess he didn’t think she would read the thread for herself. But see, that wasn’t all he did, and I am not at liberty to disclose what he ACTUALLY did....yet. But it was far worse than what you see here.
Furthermore, any “expert” worth their salt could have duplicated that stupid COLB in a heartbeat and it wouldn’t take them two years to figure it out.
So I questioned. WHY here and WHY now? What’s the deal, Polarik?
And who in the heck is Karen Bracken and why would you even insinuate I would be that person? More red herrings to redirect the heat from yourself. Trying to dig up dirt to smear me with?
I am not the one claiming to be the forensics expert here. YOU are...and obviously, you are not what you claim to be. I asked WHY.
I am still asking.


143 posted on 08/04/2010 7:45:38 AM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: danamco

I know Dan, we did. But I honestly believe I have damn good reason to be very very skeptical of Polarik. He says one thing on the boards, and another to others behind the scenes. The two stories don’t add up, and its done apparently deliberately. As if people don’t eve talk anywhere else but the boards. His makes me question the guy’s motivations.


144 posted on 08/04/2010 7:51:38 AM PDT by Danae (If Liberals were only moderately insane, they would be tollerable. Alas, such is not the case.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: danamco; Fred Nerks; stephenjohnbanker; Tex-Con-Man; Candor7; Hardraade; Danae; Polarik

danamco, I did not respond to you earlier because I understand how badly you, and everyone, including me, want obama gone. It is emotional and sometimes you have to stand back and use common sense here.
Making him go away does NOT depend on this COLB being a forgery as polarik claims. Whether it even is or isn’t makes no difference to anything whatsoever. Polarik is wrong to suggest that this thing is what made people vote for obama. I would venture to say that the number of people who actually cared about it wouldn’t have voted for him anyway. I surely didn’t. Not because of this either, but BECAUSE I ALSO do not believe that he is a natural born citizen of this country, and what is even worse, is that the man is evil personified.
I campaigned hard against him. I would do almost anything to stop what he is doing to my country. But THIS does not only NOT HELP get him gone, it aids and abets those who use these things to bolster him.
It stops GOOD people from taking our REAL concerns seriously. They won’t talk about it BECAUSE of scams like this. And make no mistake. THIS is a scam.
This ONE claim and polarik’s notoriety has been the ONE thing that has stopped Beck, Hannity, Rush, etal, from even trying to approach this seriously, although I am absolutely positive that Rush ALSO believes that obama was not a legit contender for office.
THIS is how Rush started his show yesterday:
Tuesday Quotes: America’s Real Anchorman
August 3, 2010

“Tomorrow is Obama’s birthday. Not that we’ve seen any proof of that, but tomorrow is Obama’s birthday.”

If you wish to continue to believe, that is okay. It isn’t a sin to want to have some hope. But it is sad that Polarik, as a human being, would seek the trust of innocent people like you to further his OWN goals.
Trust me, danamco. If you were to utter one single sentence questioning polarik’s authenticity, as loyal as you have been, you would be on the same end of his stick as I am...as anyone who ever questioned him is.
I wish you well. I am not your enemy.


145 posted on 08/04/2010 8:43:41 AM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; rxsid; MeekOneGOP; ...
As most of you know, I left FR on August 9, 2009 for the reasons I stated therein:

Polarik is leaving FR

And then the very next day:

August 10, 2009

Looks like I did not miss much.

146 posted on 08/04/2010 8:52:44 AM PDT by Polarik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

Polarik, you bring it with you.

100%

You are barking up the wrong tree bub. You really are.

I suggest you move on to your next cause celeb. Attempting to smear me is backfiring on you.


147 posted on 08/04/2010 9:06:47 AM PDT by Danae (If Liberals were only moderately insane, they would be tollerable. Alas, such is not the case.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

YOU are just plain evil, man. That was so far out of context it isn’t even on this plane of existence. How low are you willing to go to smear innocent people? WHAT are you trying to prove exactly?
You won’t admit you were wrong. And you are as wrong now as you were then, but you would rather slander people than admit your own mistakes so what are we supposed to believe? That somehow you are a victim of obama? Or that anyone who questions you does so on his behalf when
YOU, and YOU ALONE, have done more to help him put this over than literally any hundred other people ever could have. It has taken us all this time to clear the mess you literally created out of whole cloth and get someone with a voice to actually begin questioning obama’s eligibility, and NOW that it is FINALLY catching fire, here you are AGAIN trying to make this scam the focus of attention. WHY???
WHY, POLARIK??? WHY?


148 posted on 08/04/2010 9:13:13 AM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: palmer

“So he LIED on the application, swore to it, and he got a REAL COLB by doing so. That is absolutely fraud. He lied on his SS$. he lies every time he blinks. Please explain to me again why it needed to be a forgery when HI issues COLBs for selfsworn applications...and WHO this scam benefits.”
******

One possible reason is that Hawaiian law requires that any amended birth certificate CLEARLY indicate on the certified copy that it was AMENDED. If that was on the COLB, then everyone would ask, “What was changed, when and why?” So he might have lied on an application, swore to it, and got a REAL COLB; but, iirc, it would have listed the amendment(s) on it. He would not like THAT COLB and so would have to create a new one that looked as if nothing changed from the day he was born.


149 posted on 08/04/2010 9:14:30 AM PDT by Greenperson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

“With the “Rathergate” case, things moved swiftly to a tipping point where the majority were convinced there had been a forgery. In the case of the Obama COLB, two years of “analysis” have not convinced anyone but some true believers that there is concrete evidence of a forgery.”
*******

This may simply be a case of the media wising up. They reported the Rathergate incident, although they didn’t want to. They don’t want to report this one, either, so they studiously ignored it from the get go. Rathergate did arise quickly, so they didn’t have much time to “spin” their responses. They were ready this time, with their Alinsky tactics of never investigating, never debating—in fact, never even acknowledging—reasonable questions or logical points, but instead attacking the messenger. You know, by calling them names like “birthers” and “tea-baggers”, even frauds.


150 posted on 08/04/2010 9:21:21 AM PDT by Greenperson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

“With the “Rathergate” case, things moved swiftly to a tipping point where the majority were convinced there had been a forgery. In the case of the Obama COLB, two years of “analysis” have not convinced anyone but some true believers that there is concrete evidence of a forgery.”
*******

This may simply be a case of the media wising up. They reported the Rathergate incident, although they didn’t want to. They don’t want to report this one, either, so they studiously ignored it from the get go. Rathergate did arise quickly, so they didn’t have much time to “spin” their responses. They were ready this time, with their Alinsky tactics of never investigating, never debating—in fact, never even acknowledging—reasonable questions or logical points, but instead attacking the messenger. You know, by calling them names like “birthers” and “tea-baggers”, even frauds.


151 posted on 08/04/2010 9:21:26 AM PDT by Greenperson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

MestaMachine; Danae; LorenC

Are you putting these three in the same category? If so, then we know where you’re coming from and why it is that some people answer questions directed to others.

Thanks y’all for introducing me to a new acronym: FINOs.


152 posted on 08/04/2010 9:35:18 AM PDT by Greenperson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Polarik; MestaMachine; Danae
In order to enhance your credibility you link to a page where you say...

"BUT, I am never logging back on FR as Polarik again.

That's a promise I will keep."

...Seriously?

See if any of this applies...

MayoClinic Symptoms of Narcissistic Personality Disorder

153 posted on 08/04/2010 9:39:07 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

I feel like an idiot for sitting through that video. What a waste of time.


154 posted on 08/04/2010 9:41:37 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine; Polarik; Fred Nerks; Jim Robinson
Mesta, its a legal issue. The utterance of a false document. Its fraud designed to make Obama appear as a qualified candidate under Article II of the Constitution. Therefore Polariks work is an offensive weapon. It has nothing to do with whether the fake BC made people vote for Obama or not as an emotional issue.

Now the left knows all of this.Obama has spent nearly 2 million dollars defending any due process reveal of his BC.He has sealed his Occidental College records because he was a foreign student who was enrolled in non citizen programs.

What Polarik has is a weapon, a very effective one, its empirical proof. As a result he is under personal and professional risk and also some pressure from many who use every method they can to destroy him and his credibility,including personal threats to his physical well being. Orly Taitz and Sarah Palin are similarly victimized by the left to a much greater extent. Is there no wonder then that Polarik might be a bit strident and prickly? I understand the reasons for that perfectly. Yet he has stood that denigration/attack dynamic alone, with very minimal help from anyone. That takes courage and tenacity, and it is admirable. It also makes him punchy and willing to attack at the slightest provocation. He has learned well from the school of hard knocks.

I understand you may dislike Polarik, but you might take the view to overcome that for the greater cause , the salvation of our Repubublic.Put it behind you if you can.

I think its gettng close to the time when Polarik will need some funding help, and I am ready to help with that as soon as his book is ready.I want to see that sword in his hand being wielded with the same power that he defends his work.It has nothing to do with whether I like Polarik, it has everything to do with defeating an enemy that has a strangle hold on America.Polarik is our foxhole buddy,we are not marrying him, at least not yet anyways! LOL.

155 posted on 08/04/2010 9:48:06 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama .......yes......is fascist... ..He meets every diagnostic of history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Danae

MestaMachine said, “the SUBJECT was supposed to be the document NOT her.” The first person to mention your name, to make you the subject of the thread, was MestaMachine, who also said this: “I heard from Danae this time telling me she did not want her personal information posted.” And then this: “Don’t think she will mind if I post it since I sent it.” And then MestaMachine gives a link to another thread where someone can find such personal information.

Danae, if this is your friend, he or she is doing you a disservice, from what I can gather through all this “shouting”.

I had thought this thread was about the document, too. But many seem to want to distract from that issue by creating controversy about anything but that issue. Why?


156 posted on 08/04/2010 9:52:45 AM PDT by Greenperson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine; Polarik

Nice job flogging the Polarik.

Credit where credit is due. My congratulations, Ma’am.


157 posted on 08/04/2010 9:59:40 AM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

“Now the left knows all of this.Obama has spent nearly 2 million dollars defending any due process reveal of his BC.He has sealed his Occidental College records because he was a foreign student who was enrolled in non citizen programs.”

All of which has absolutely NOTHING to do with the thing being a forgery. Fraud, yes. Lying. False swearing. A myriad of other things. But bam would have done every single thing he has done regardless. He was NEVER going to release any information about himself. THIS is a scam that benefits no one except polarik and the hard left. It is a weapon alright...to use AGAINST us, not for us. I believe that with every fiber of my being.
I love you, but on this specific issue, knowing what I know about DocRJP, past and present, we will just have to agree to disagree.


158 posted on 08/04/2010 10:07:04 AM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Greenperson

You don’t know what you are talking about. Context is everything here. And everything you said was just out of whack. There is more to this than what you said or what you think you know, so really, your comments are just off the wall.


159 posted on 08/04/2010 10:13:10 AM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Greenperson

PS, maybe you should read the whole thread and catch the wave. The subject is polarik and his supposed experise on “forgeries” that were not forgeries. HE made it something else.


160 posted on 08/04/2010 10:17:25 AM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-295 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson