And then the very next day:
Looks like I did not miss much.
Polarik, you bring it with you.
100%
You are barking up the wrong tree bub. You really are.
I suggest you move on to your next cause celeb. Attempting to smear me is backfiring on you.
YOU are just plain evil, man. That was so far out of context it isn’t even on this plane of existence. How low are you willing to go to smear innocent people? WHAT are you trying to prove exactly?
You won’t admit you were wrong. And you are as wrong now as you were then, but you would rather slander people than admit your own mistakes so what are we supposed to believe? That somehow you are a victim of obama? Or that anyone who questions you does so on his behalf when
YOU, and YOU ALONE, have done more to help him put this over than literally any hundred other people ever could have. It has taken us all this time to clear the mess you literally created out of whole cloth and get someone with a voice to actually begin questioning obama’s eligibility, and NOW that it is FINALLY catching fire, here you are AGAIN trying to make this scam the focus of attention. WHY???
WHY, POLARIK??? WHY?
"BUT, I am never logging back on FR as Polarik again.
That's a promise I will keep."
...Seriously?
See if any of this applies...
Pa. Dems help put birther on ballot
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=3CD0A42F-18FE-70B2-A8754A753BBF7D14
Jim Schneller, a tea party activist who once filed suit against the state of Pennsylvania demanding that President Obama present his birth certificate.
“Lentz’s supporters and associates have engaged in an underhanded attempt to manipulate the ballot and split the conservative vote by using Jim Schneller as nothing more than a prop,” said Bryan Kendro, Meehan’s campaign manager.
(I hope voters in this district don’t fall for this. It is crucial that Repubs win House and Fire Nancy Pelosi! That is job numero uno.)
(But I also hope Repub candidates also see that Dems are trying to get them to go on the record casting “birthers” in a bad light. They know Repub candidates will lose votes if they do that. So don’t fall into that trap. Find a way to be neutral.)
***
Hi, Polarik!
I know this post has nothing whatsover to do with this “conversation.”
Frankly, FR is one of the only places around to read what you write about Obama COLB.
So I look forward to hearing more from you on that.
Have a good day. I hope this finds you and yours well.
Rose
“Let’s have some fun and play like Polarik.”
http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2010/08/03/so-sad-passportgate-and-open-thread/
So S. Ann Soetoro wanted to exclude little Soebarkah from her passport.
Did someone later on, perhaps decades later, write ”Barack Hussein Obama” above Soebarkah, put parentheses around the Indonesian name, and then cross out the entire thing?
Did page 2 originally say ONLY “Soebarkah”–the name of the child she wanted excluded from her 1965 passport?
What was his name in 1968?
Did S. Ann Soetoro exclude him from her passport because he had his very own Indonesian passport that he could use?
Is that why, when she tried to bring him back in 1971, she had to request a waiver to enter the country with him?
Because he was no longer on her passport?
***
Pure speculation, of course.
But where Obama eligibility is concerned, what choice do we have but to speculate?
And I’m guessing Obama wants us to look everywhere EXCEPT where we s/b looking.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/05/10/hawaii-governor-accused-of-suborning-election-fraud/
Polarik says:
Monday, May 10, 2010 at 9:50 PM
Lingle NEVER said Obama’s birth certificate was legit. In fact, she made no statements at all (until now).
PetJake is Polarik
PetJake 09. Aug, 2010 at 10:07 am
Dr. C – you presented this article not as a knowledgeable reference on surveys – which it was not – but as yet another attack piece on “Birthers,” that just so happen to touch on one “Birther survey” conducted by the Daily Kos, written by an anonymous author.
The quote about how people respond was simply a hook to bring in your readers.
The point of my post was totally missed by the people who, once again, devolved into ad hominem arguments to make their point.
The discussion following my information piece does little to assuage the belief that liberals always turn every discussion started by someone who does not agree with them into a personal attack.
(Boy, and how!)
The reason for doing so is to absolve them of ever having to actually process what was written.
It does not matter that I have 38 years of experience in designing and conducting large-scale surveys, because the lunatic fringe who attacked me would simply find another way to denigrate that as well.
So far, I have yet to see anything resembling an intelligent, well-thought out discussion by those arrogantly claiming to be smart and highly educated.
Factcheck? Politifact? Honolulu Advertiser? C’mon, Doc. These are not part of the “Mainstream Media.”
As I said, what does matter is how you ask the question and what are the choices given.
The example you gave, ” “Are you sure Barack Obama was born in the United States?” is a loaded question designed to prompt uncertainty.
The CNN question did nothing of the sort.
Their question was worded unambiguously and the choices given were equally balanced.
The point I made is valid – that the way the question is worded and presented, along with the choices that are given, significantly effect the outcome of the survey far more than any heuristics involved in choosing the answer that best fits their interpetation and understanding.
Found at ObamaConspiracy