Posted on 12/05/2009 3:41:40 PM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing
I'm all for Ralph Nader running again. I'd love for Howard Dean to get fed up or some other Democrat to get fed up with Obama and I'd love for a third party of Democrats and liberals to establish itself. I want all kinds of liberals to line and up run in third parties. That's how we weaken their side. As for our side, the focus must be to take back the Republican Party. That's the way you win. You can draw attention to yourself by denouncing both parties at the same time, and you can think that you're relating to a whole lot of people or being disabused and forgotten about, but you do a grave disservice in doing so because you're never going to win anything. You're going to guarantee Democrat victory in perpetuity. We need a strong conservative movement that takes back the Republican Party and then we have a strong Republican Party. It's hard work but it is happening.
then they get their faux morality and enlightenment, thinking that the record is too cumbersome to simply click back and see the postings...
now according to the mods, somebody shoulda just mashed the abuse button right there and had it zotted...rather than respond and escalate...
i think it simply highlights the hypocrisy of these tools...
“Of course not. RINOs and BushBots are hypocrites, the rules don’t apply to them, only to everyone else, just like the liberals do. “
I’m still waiting on a reply from my tiny post # 850
Don’t hold your breath for a reply. Any “inconvenient truths” about our 43rd President are sent straight down the BushBot Memory Hole.
I am getting tired of Alinsky-esque replies, anyway ;-)
It’s all they’ve got. LOL
I’ll take a hot fudge sundae with whipped cream........hold the nuts.
My euphemism was intended for those who understand the imagery and are engaging in the political version of what the imagery represents. It's not an in-your-face profanity, a la "Eff you you ignorant slob" or some of the other stuff on this thread. It wasn't intended for anyone who might not want to "go there" and it's easily ignored by them.
So what's your point of pinging someone to the imagery? A de rigueur lack of charity?
And what kind of a wuss does that anyway?
you pinged and posted my comments in total, as you hyperventilated at its audacity...
guess you answered yer own question a couple days ago...
Did I ping someone to a post of yours to call attention to a crass euphemism you had made in order to accuse someone of hypocrisy,
You big poopoo head?
This isn't a given. Conservative Republicans in Congress have been pushing for vouchers for private schools and parochial schools for years as the first step toward enabling poor people to be able to reap the benefits of a nonpublic, quality education firsthand. The steps between "we will allow you to use public funds for private education" to "we can eliminate the step of redistribution and allow you to use your own funds for education" to "we can put education back in the hands of the states" are necessary if we are to ever dismantle the federal government's (and the teachers' union's) power over schools.
What you don't seem to realize, and on this I might be wrong, is that conservatism requires incrementalism in order to succeed. The liberal agenda has been creeping up on this country since Hoover...and the dam just broke with the election of Obama. The only way to stop socialism in America is to elect stealth constitutionalists to positions of Federal power. Entitlements rule the day in Washington. They can't be dismantled en masse, because they're entitlements. The American people will not elect any conservative who states that he wants to dismantle Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, or any other entitlement...because the Mainstream Media will run interference for the Democrats, as they always have.
Any Republican (Ron Paul excepted) who takes any small step toward decentralization is mocked by you retardos. James Inhofe has flown to Copenhagen to tell the world that President Obama can't deliver on any treaty he signs there...and what do I read here? "Stuff it, RINO!" "Too little too late, Inhofe!"
This is evidence of you having no common cause with actual conservatism. Do you want to talk about short-term thinking? Conservatism refuses to defeat itself by demanding more than it can achieve all at once...by refusing to elect men and women who can't see a span longer than grades 10 through 12.
And every Senator and Representative on my list of folks who voted for NCLB understands what you won't understand for another 30 years.
This isn't a battle. It's a protracted war that's been going on since The Great Depression, but it can be permanently lost in one year by electing guys like Obama ...and by refusing to vote for Governor Palin, you enabled Marxism.
And remember! "Any IDIOT who says Obama would be better for the country than McCain is a disgrace" - holdonnow
It’s too bad you just don’t realize the brilliance you are contending with........
So do I.
“(We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub. III OK)
O K
Merry Christmas
I quit the Republican Party because they quit representing my conservative views.
I am now an independent conservative, no party affiliation whatsoever. McCain was the last time I’ll ever vote for a Republican for no reason other than he’s not “quite as bad” as the Democrat. That vote left me feeling dirty, used, and powerless.
I won’t be a slave to a political party ever again. I am a free, independent man. If the GOP wants my vote, they’ll have to earn it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.