Posted on 11/15/2008 6:48:02 PM PST by palmer
Look at the voting process. In our State you don't have to show any proof that you are eligible to vote. You can vote and register on the same day up to election day. Also, drivers licenses are given to illegals here, so there is no way to prove whether they are eligible to vote or not. The process is out of control and seems to apply to citizens only.
A retired federal agent in investigating the Selective Service Registration.
Tell us all how his registration can be on a Form dated Feb 1 1980?
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/
On the SSS Form 1, in the lower left hand corner is the form number (SSS Form 1) and the month and year version of the form, labeled as "B". On this particular Form 1, it clearly shows the month as "FEB" (February), and the year is either "80" or "90". The retired federal agent investigated further: Magnification of the form both physically (with a 10x glass) or with different image software does not reflect a clear cut result of either a "80" or a "90". But, checking the history of SSS Form 1 (see http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=198002-3240-001#), it's apparent that in February 1980, the Selective Service agency withdrew a "Request for a new OMB control number" for SSS Form 1 (see also, here)--meaning the agency canceled its previous request for a new form, and one was never issued in "FEB 1980". Since under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-511, 94 Stat. 2812 (Dec. 11, 1980), codified in part at Subchapter I of Chapter 35 of Title 44 a federal agency can not use a form not approved by OMB (Office of Management and Budget), it's nearly impossible for Senator/President-Elect Obama's SSS Form 1 to be dated "Feb 1980." And since that makes it almost certainly dated "Feb 1990," then how could Barack Obama sign it and the postal clerk stamp it almost ten (10) years before its issue?! Simply not possible.
Barak Hussein Mohammed Obama, the first undocumnted President of The United States. Surreal.
Factcheck is biased and has an agenda. They could have forged the artifacts in their photos. They could have photographed the artifacts knowing that someone forged them. They could have photographed them not knowing anything about authenticating documents.
What I point out is the evidence that they present is much more substantial than Polarik's continued attacks on low res Kos and smears scans. He needs to address the artifacts, specifically how they were made (various possibilities) and then photographed. If he continues to promote the idea that everything was photoshopped (e.g. his recent statement about how round the seal was) then I will continue to point out that his whole premise is wrong.
If nothing else, doesn’t that settle the “certificate of live birth not being the same as the birth certificate” thing?....
Yes it does. But, people will not let facts get in the way of their opinions.
If he was born in Kenya he would have British citizenship. It is quite possible he has had British, Indonesian, and maybe US citizenship.
That's my biggest worry of the new administration. I'm not suggesting they are honest about anything, but I am objectively evaluating their evidence.
For a newbie, you seem to know the reason behind everything.
Agreed. The same types go on and on whether McCain is a natural born citizen which was established, no longer and issue but these Ob-bot shills just want to waste our time in the same way Palmer is. Anyone mentioning Factcheck as a reliable source has to be an O-Bot.
Why did Obama provide a forged COLB as proof. He must think we are all stupid. A forged COLB leads me to believe he was bron in Kenya.
Good one.
Oh? Who are they? Where is their research?
According to the state of Hawaii website (http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/vital-records/index.html), persons born outside the U.S. can have their births registered in Hawaii. Here is a quote from the website:
“Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign country.”
“Why does he have to show that copy?? “
Because it’s the primary document, not a derivative. I ran across this once, I showed a COLB and the agency demanded the original (and it was not for the presidency, but for something far more mundane).
Well let’s see how Palmer responds to an obvious issue with Zero’s Selective Service Registration. He will have to tell us how it is possible that Zero could have registered on a Feb 1980 form.
Excellent quote, cc.
Just accept what he and his ilk have offered as fact? Are you kidding?! Take the word of a Rat Party (formerly the traditional, patriotic Democratic Party) leader and/or stalwart?!
Oh.. I almost forgot. There's the matter of that pesky Constitutional thingy.
Why does the Constitution matter so little to so many? Go figure. It don't make a lick of sense.
Alan Keyes Files Suit in California Superior Court 11/13/08
Superior Court of California - County of Sacremento ^
Posted on Saturday, November 15, 2008 7:29:37 AM by atlbelle44
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2132245/posts
“Senator Barack H. Obama is a candidate for the Office of the President of the United
States. However, to assume such office, Senator Obama must meet the qualifications specified for the
Office of the President of the United States, which includes that he must be a “natural born” citizen.
Senator Obama has failed to demonstrate that he is a “natural born” citizen. There are other legal
challenges before various state and federal courts regarding aspects of lost or dual citizenship concerning
Senator Obama. Those challenges, in and of themselves, demonstrate Petitioners’ argument that
reasonable doubt exists as to the eligibility of the Democratic Party’s nominee for President.”
From the suit filed yesterday.....
Can’t load that site, too many images, but there is only one posting of a document (obamaselectiveserviceregist.jpg) and nothing to compare it to. The explanation that you quoted may be valid, but there’s no way for me to know.
“This birth certificate nonsense is fool’s bait.....”
If there was anything to it...Her Heinouness and the used car salesman she lives with would have done gone an’ run with it a LONG time ago........
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.