Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Republic Poll on Evolution
Free Republic ^ | 22 September 2006 | Vanity

Posted on 09/22/2006 2:09:33 PM PDT by PatrickHenry

Free Republic is currently running a poll on this subject:

Do you think creationism or intelligent design should be taught in science classes in secondary public schools as a competing scientific theory to evolution?
You can find the poll at the bottom of your "self search" page, also titled "My Comments," where you go to look for posts you've received.

I don't know what effect -- if any -- the poll will have on the future of this website's science threads. But it's certainly worth while to know the general attitude of the people who frequent this website.

Science isn't a democracy, and the value of scientific theories isn't something that's voted upon. The outcome of this poll won't have any scientific importance. But the poll is important because this is a political website. How we decide to educate our children is a very important issue. It's also important whether the political parties decide to take a position on this. (I don't think they should, but it may be happening anyway.)

If you have an opinion on this subject, go ahead and vote.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: crevolist; evolution; id
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,561-1,5801,581-1,6001,601-1,6201,621-1,636 next last
To: Doctor Stochastic
He didn't seem to endorse the Soviet nuclear weapons project in "The Big Red Bomb" either.

Hold on...

(sound of 5-watt bulb sputtering above my head...)

...OH!!

The Making of the Atomic Bomb had a sequel, you mean.

I'll have to read it, thanks for letting me know it existed.

(sigh. one *more* task for my overburdened reading list.)

Cheers!

1,601 posted on 10/05/2006 8:50:16 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1598 | View Replies]

To: Quark2005
in reality it involves thousands of man-hours of painstaking work in labs using the most cutting-edge technology available, with adamant conclusions being drawn only after making completely sure, through multiple avenues of inquiry, that the data is solid

You do explain the ideal, but individual mileage may vary.

See for example John Darsee, Hwang Woo-Suk; and of course for waters muddied for a long time see David Baltimore.

For other sniping read Gary Taubes' Nobel Dreams about Carlo Rubbia...

Cheers!

1,602 posted on 10/05/2006 9:00:52 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1589 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Using "Answers in Guiness" as your basis for posting again?

Spellcheck is your friend.

And speaking of friends, please refrain from disparaging my favorite beer.

Cheers!

1,603 posted on 10/05/2006 9:04:03 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1564 | View Replies]

To: Jaguarbhzrd
I guess thats about the retread accusation, well you sounded somewhat like CG.

You say you are not (and now the mod too) so thats good enough for me.

Take Care,

W.
1,604 posted on 10/05/2006 9:05:44 PM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1597 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite

nicely done.


1,605 posted on 10/05/2006 11:08:31 PM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1600 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf; Jaguarbhzrd; andysandmikesmom; Admin Moderator

that is what you call an apology?

do you recall the apology I rendered to you, without being prompted, upon realizing -on my own, mind you- that I had misread one of your posts and had gone off on you less justly than I had thought?

Do you need me to dig up the URL to that apology, or will you -in a sudden fit of real humility- admit that I did indeed make such an apology to you?

THAT, sir, was an apology.

You owe that much and more - to jaguarbhzrd, to andysandmikesmom, and to quite a few others here.

the kiss to the buttocks you gave to the Admin Mod after being slapped was more sincere than your "apology" to jaguarbhzrd, and that grotesquely obsequious smooch positively REEKED of C.Y.O.A.

many of those who support creationism/ID/platonism sadden me, puzzle me, and even irritate me... but almost none actually revolt me.

almost none.


1,606 posted on 10/05/2006 11:32:17 PM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1604 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
Its the game called Prime collecting.
Here's how it goes.
You have to be quick.
So keep on your toes.
Press the mouse button down,
  set the browser address,
  watch the posts add up,
  but don't be slow.
'Cause for Prime collecting,
  you got to move real fast.
Move real fast!
Because Patrick Henry will show up
  before you can grab the last.
And that's Prime collecting!

1,607 posted on 10/05/2006 11:46:58 PM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1605 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
Haven't seen you on these threads for many an age...

Hope all is well.

Cheers!

1,608 posted on 10/05/2006 11:50:38 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1606 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

all is... acceptable-to-well, thanks.
I trust all goes well with you and yours?


1,609 posted on 10/06/2006 12:12:39 AM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1608 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite

rework it a skosh so you can set it to the "slinkie" jingle, and you might have an earworm


1,610 posted on 10/06/2006 12:14:00 AM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1607 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
Fair-to-middlin', lad.

Thanks for asking.

But it is past my bedtime, so off to sleep I go...

G'night...

ZZZZZZZZZZZZ

1,611 posted on 10/06/2006 12:15:10 AM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1609 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

yeah, same here. 'nite.


1,612 posted on 10/06/2006 12:20:57 AM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1611 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
rework it a skosh so you can set it to the "slinkie" jingle, and you might have an earworm

Damn. It's like writing "Cats" and being told to lose the animals and throw in a chandelier and an organ.

<sniff!>

1,613 posted on 10/06/2006 12:42:25 AM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1610 | View Replies]

Mealy mouthed weasel excuse for an apology placemarker.


1,614 posted on 10/06/2006 12:47:20 AM PDT by Thatcherite (I'm PatHenry I'm the real PatHenry all the other PatHenrys are just imitators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1604 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
You do explain the ideal, but individual mileage may vary.

Oh, I agree, the process isn't perfect, but it's far better than the alternatives!

The way the system is set up, the 'bull' tends to iron itself out over time - the only question is how much time....

1,615 posted on 10/06/2006 5:44:00 AM PDT by Quark2005 (Religion is the key to knowing the spiritual world; Science is the key to knowing the physical world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1602 | View Replies]

Neutral, non-offensive, non-apologetic placemarker.


1,616 posted on 10/06/2006 6:50:50 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1604 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

1,617 posted on 10/06/2006 7:10:15 AM PDT by longshadow (FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1616 | View Replies]

Placemarker Placemarker Placemarker


1,618 posted on 10/06/2006 7:22:35 AM PDT by ahayes (My strength is as the strength of ten because my heart is pure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1562 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
Placemarker. Darwin Central directive: Switch to plan 7-b.
1,619 posted on 10/06/2006 8:36:34 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1617 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite
Damn. It's like writing "Cats" and being told to lose the animals and throw in a chandelier and an organ.

well, you know, all those Gilbert and Sullivan ditties sound alike.

1,620 posted on 10/06/2006 8:39:27 AM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1613 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,561-1,5801,581-1,6001,601-1,6201,621-1,636 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson