Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXXON CHAIRMAN GETS $400 MILLION RETIREMENT PACKAGE AMID SOARING GAS PRICES
ABC News via Drudge ^

Posted on 04/14/2006 1:20:10 PM PDT by aShepard

April 14, 2006— Soaring gas prices are squeezing most Americans at the pump, but at least one man isn't complaining.

Last year, Exxon made the biggest profit of any company ever, $36 billion, and its retiring chairman appears to be reaping the benefits.

Exxon is giving Lee Raymond one of the most generous retirement packages in history, nearly $400 million, including pension, stock options and other perks, such as a $1 million consulting deal, two years of home security, personal security, a car and driver, and use of a corporate jet for professional purposes.

Last November, when he was still chairman of Exxon, Raymond told Congress that gas prices were high because of global supply and demand.

"We're all in this together, everywhere in the world," he testified.

Raymond, however, was confronted with caustic complaints about his compensation.

"In 2004, Mr. Raymond, your bonus was over $3.6 million," Sen. Barbara Boxer said.

That was before new corporate documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that revealed Raymond's retirement deal and his $51.1 million paycheck in 2005. That's equivalent to $141,000 a day, nearly $6,000 an hour. It's almost more than five times what the CEO of Chevron made.

"I think it will spark a lot of outrage," said Sarah Anderson, a fellow in the global economy program at the Institute for Policy Studies, an independent think tank. "Clearly much of his high-level pay is due to the high price of gas."

Exxon defends Raymond's compensation, pointing out that during the 12 years he ran the company, Exxon became the largest oil company in the world and that the stock price went up 500 percent.

A company spokesman said the compensation package reflected "a very long and distinguished career."

Some Exxon shareholders are now trying to pass resolutions criticizing the company's executive pay policies. The company is urging other shareholders to vote against those resolutions.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: badtiming; bigoil; conservativenameonly; deserveseverypenny; energy; exxon; exxonmobile; gasprices; goldenparachute; hero; oil; overpaid; raymond; retirement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 641-654 next last
To: stevem

Curious how the Freeper Socialists never object to the $.50 cent in taxes the Govt takes out of each gallon compared to the $.10 the Oil Companies make. But that right, the pay masters at the DNC don't pay the Virtual Campaigners to tell the truth.


41 posted on 04/14/2006 1:38:27 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (The Democrat Party. For those who value slogans over solutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: aShepard
Let's see, lets SWAG an estimated 100 million cars on the road. That's $4 per car, right? His cost to an American driver for this year would be 4 bucks, if Exxon fueled all their tanks. Lets say he only fueled a quarter of those tanks, so $16 per Exxon customer.

Let's say then, 2 tanks of gas a month per car. Somewhere around 24 tanks a year, $16 divided by 24 tanks is 67 cents per tank.

If his bonus came from the backs of the consumer, it cost the consumer 67 cents per tank.

I'm just trying to pare down the $400 million to numbers that are understandable. This is not withstanding that Exxon can spend profits however they choose vis-a-vis employee compensation.
42 posted on 04/14/2006 1:39:17 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BW2221

"I'm hoping O'Reilly and Congress makes him sweat a lot to earn a portion of it."

What a stupid thing to say. He's earned his money working for Exxon/Mobil, not Congress, not Bill O'Reilly.


43 posted on 04/14/2006 1:39:44 PM PDT by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000
If you aren't a stock holder, it is like being Canadian and hating George W. Bush.
LOL! Well said!
44 posted on 04/14/2006 1:40:15 PM PDT by jennyp (WHAT I'M READING NOW: your mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: aShepard

I don't want to even hear the whiners who think this is excessive...

The United States consumes roughly 9 million barrels of gasoline a day...a barrel of gasoline equals 42 gallons...average tax on a gallon of gas equals 42 cents...

9M x 42Gal x .42 x 365 = $57,947,400,000 in State and Federal Taxes Annually!!!!

You read that correctly...58 Billion in taxes on fuel alone....


45 posted on 04/14/2006 1:40:55 PM PDT by antaresequity (PUSH 1 FOR ENGLISH - PUSH 2 TO BE DEPORTED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie; All

Don't forget we have a right to cheap gas.. Even though it is not in the Constitution... /s


46 posted on 04/14/2006 1:41:07 PM PDT by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ConTex

"You tell me why it was done."

Maybe because it saved Exxon/Mobil some MONEY??? Are you aware that many companies do it for the same reason? Do you understand economics?


47 posted on 04/14/2006 1:41:43 PM PDT by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion

Oh, another assumption:

12 gallon gas tanks -> Consumer cost for the bonus: 6 cents per gallon over the course of the year


48 posted on 04/14/2006 1:41:56 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

So should the chance to be fleeced by oligarcy oil and opec!


49 posted on 04/14/2006 1:42:09 PM PDT by ConTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: aShepard

Guess what? America is a capitalist nation, the goal is to make money. If his company had lost money and it's stock had gone down during his tenure he would have been fired.

And OPEC only controls the SUPPLY of oil, they do not set the PRICE. And as Raymond and others have pointed out, if we opened ANWR and other places in the US, got rid of "boutique" fuel standards, and allowed more refineries to be built, the price of oil would drop dramatically.


50 posted on 04/14/2006 1:42:17 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cweese

Dear cweese,

"What types of jobs did he move out of the US for the 'hell of it'?"

I don't know if it was "for the hell of it," but during this time, ExxonMobil did outsource a lot of its information technology work, and off-shored it out of the United States. During the depths of the IT depression in the early '00s, I interviewed a fellow or two who had been dumped unceremoniously as a result of that move.


sitetest


51 posted on 04/14/2006 1:42:51 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: aShepard

$400M! Was he a union member, or just a plain run of the mill crook?


52 posted on 04/14/2006 1:43:09 PM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

"WMT took the title away from GM (IIRC) several years ago."

Yup, and GM took the title away from Exxon several years before that.


53 posted on 04/14/2006 1:43:37 PM PDT by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: cweese

I know that it did not save much, if any money.


I still must assume you work in the Exxonmobil HQ in Irving. Asking you what's going on in Exxon is like asking an islamic what's going on in the mosque.

How are those guatamalan accoutants working out?


54 posted on 04/14/2006 1:43:50 PM PDT by ConTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

It is in the Constitution. Life Liberty and the pursuit of cheap gas. Oh happiness.


55 posted on 04/14/2006 1:44:59 PM PDT by JackDanielsOldNo7 (If it wasn't for marriage, I would not have this screenname.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: aShepard

Make sure Eliot Spitzer doesn't hear about this.


56 posted on 04/14/2006 1:45:17 PM PDT by synbad600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
The problem here isn't gas prices or profit, it's executive compensation. Exxon is the largest oil company in the world, so it's not a part time job running that organization, but doesn't this seem a bit excessive?
57 posted on 04/14/2006 1:45:29 PM PDT by txroadhawg ("Stuck on stupid? I invented stupid! " Al Gore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

sitetest, I understand. The 'for the hell of it' comment was from ConTex, not me. I know several folks dumped in similar fashion from the energy business at that time.


58 posted on 04/14/2006 1:46:13 PM PDT by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
"we should be glad to pay whatever they ask for gas"
Don't pay for gas - use biodiesel, get powered by moonshine or fly a broom instead. Or maybe Hugo Chavez will take pity at you and give you some subsidized gas.
59 posted on 04/14/2006 1:46:46 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: aShepard

All that looks like Lebron's next contract to stay with Cleveland.


60 posted on 04/14/2006 1:47:42 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (Politicians are in it for themselves, to get reelected, to benefit them, not we the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 641-654 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson