Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush will veto any bill to stop port deal
AP ALERT

Posted on 02/21/2006 12:32:20 PM PST by Brian Mosely

ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE (AP) — President Bush says the deal allowing an Arab company to take over six major U.S. seaports should go forward and he will veto any bill that would stop it.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: 1handwashestheother; blahblahblah; botsusingtheracecard; buchananbrigade; bushbotsbluedresses; bushbotscirclewagons; bushclintonbushclint; bushsellout; clownposse; coulterwillexplode; d; dontworrybehappy; downfallofbush; dubaidubaidu; dubaidubya; dusappersinatizzy; eternalevil; failedcivicsclass; gameoverman; globalists; homelandsecurity; homosexual; howlermonkeys; howlinbots; howlinmonkeys; howlinsgang; hysteriatrain; ilovekeywords; jorgealbush; kneejerk; kneepadsstat; libtard; masshysteria; moonbatsonparade; muchadoaboutnothing; newworldorder; nonstory; openborderbushbots; pantiesinabunch; ports; ratpackattack; ratpackdunces; religionofports; surrendermonkeys; texasholdem; treason; uae; vetothisbutnotcfr; waronterror; wppff; wsayswhatmeworry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,401-1,4201,421-1,4401,441-1,460 ... 3,061-3,079 next last
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

"Why put the party in greater risk of losing seats in November?"

Isn't that just the $64,000.00 question?


1,421 posted on 02/21/2006 4:29:45 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1409 | View Replies]

To: World'sGoneInsane

Im with you on this one (post #1360)....absolutely incredible! I cannot even believe energy is being wasted on this or why it's even a question....


1,422 posted on 02/21/2006 4:30:06 PM PST by BossLady (Islam: Any excuse for a Jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1360 | View Replies]

To: jacquej

I support Bush too, but If a Nuke takes out one of our major cities, we should BAN both the Democratic and Republican parties forever and vote Libertarian!


1,423 posted on 02/21/2006 4:31:06 PM PST by AmericanDave (More COWBELL....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1391 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

He has to find it first under all that dust.


1,424 posted on 02/21/2006 4:31:15 PM PST by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

Sure is. Weeks like this make me wish I had one.

-Dan

1,425 posted on 02/21/2006 4:31:30 PM PST by Flux Capacitor (Trust me. I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1414 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

No, the $64,0000 question is: If you get your wish and the deal falls through, what then?


1,426 posted on 02/21/2006 4:32:45 PM PST by Doohickey (If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice...I will choose freewill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1421 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
Sure we are capable of running our own ports, So if Bush had suggested Haliburton, what kind of media response would he have gotten? Now he can let the Congress FORCE Halliburton on him, LOL......
1,427 posted on 02/21/2006 4:33:24 PM PST by AmericanDave (More COWBELL....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1398 | View Replies]

To: Brian Mosely

Corzine, a Democrat, cited a "deep, deep feeling that this is the wrong direction for our nation to take."
What? All .000000000314 of an inch?


1,428 posted on 02/21/2006 4:33:25 PM PST by Danae (Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader

I will trust the President over his detractors for now.


1,429 posted on 02/21/2006 4:33:27 PM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1418 | View Replies]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
I'm going to require evidence here. I was opposed to Miers because the evidence tended to prove she would be incompetent on the Supreme Court. In a similar fashion, I would like to weigh some evidence here. If the evidence is there, it ought to be easy to come up with. My own google search persuades me only that this is a straightforward business deal that doesn't change personnel or security measures substantially, if at all. But maybe I'm missing something.

Exactly how does this deal compromise US security? Please be as specific as you can.

1,430 posted on 02/21/2006 4:33:38 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1412 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
DP World will only provide some logistics-related services. They won't be "running" the port by any means.

I've only heard this via MSM. Regardless, I had no idea that our country would pay any other country to handle our business in the ports. It appears hard enough to keep track of what's coming in. In my mind since the WTC bombing, the ports were what needed to be secured. This contract could provide a weak link.

1,431 posted on 02/21/2006 4:33:53 PM PST by World'sGoneInsane (LET NO ONE BE FORGOTTEN, LET NO ONE FORGET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1367 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I read the other day too that this company is the only company that inspects every single shipment sent from their country of origin. Wish I had a link.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,185107,00.html

"DPW would not be responsible for cargo screening, which is performed by the Department of Homeland Security, but the port operator is responsible for securing cargo coming in and out of the port, the port facility itself and the hiring of security personnel."

1,432 posted on 02/21/2006 4:34:12 PM PST by La Enchiladita (God bless our troops and their families.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1075 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
"We're not a war against any specific nation so your point is nonsensical"

No, your statement is clearly WRONG....

1,433 posted on 02/21/2006 4:34:32 PM PST by AmericanDave (More COWBELL....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1396 | View Replies]

To: indcons

That's the sum of your evidence?


1,434 posted on 02/21/2006 4:34:41 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1419 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
You are not forced to read anything I write. Some people enjoy my rants. If you are not one of them, you have no need to read them, now do you? Just amazing. Like it's forced down your stupid throat or something. You need a clue.
1,435 posted on 02/21/2006 4:34:56 PM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1383 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

----If a Nuke takes out one of our major cities, we should BAN both the Democratic and Republican parties forever and vote Libertarian!----

Did you hear Michael Badnarik's theories on national security last election? The LP makes Ted Kennedy look like George Patton.

-Dan

1,436 posted on 02/21/2006 4:35:14 PM PST by Flux Capacitor (Trust me. I know what I'm doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1423 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
I'd rather you Xenophobes explain away your silliness with no 'facts' except "They's BROWN PEOPLE!"

A finalist in today's Morris Dees Best Post Award.

1,437 posted on 02/21/2006 4:35:27 PM PST by Pelham ("Borders? We don' need no stinking borders!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1198 | View Replies]

Comment #1,438 Removed by Moderator

To: AmericanDave

Well, AmericanDave... some of us conservatives let the neo-cons slime that funny guy from Texas.. remember the one who first talked about the sucking sound?

Then they slimed Buchanan, and took over the pubs. Now, I am emotional at the moment, and a woman, so cut me some slack.

But, I do remember that funny guy from Texas saying soemthing about how dangerous it is to deal with the middle-easterners... something about tents, and how we think we have a deal with them, and then we get the short end of a stick we never even saw?

I am just a lil ol conservative lady, and am completely bewildered by this whole mess. Maybe a good night's sleep will help?


1,439 posted on 02/21/2006 4:35:55 PM PST by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1423 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
A British company OWNs our ports now, but WE run them.

Pretty ironic after the Boston Tea Party. Damn.

1,440 posted on 02/21/2006 4:36:01 PM PST by World'sGoneInsane (LET NO ONE BE FORGOTTEN, LET NO ONE FORGET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1381 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,401-1,4201,421-1,4401,441-1,460 ... 3,061-3,079 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson