Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush will veto any bill to stop port deal
AP ALERT

Posted on 02/21/2006 12:32:20 PM PST by Brian Mosely

ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE (AP) — President Bush says the deal allowing an Arab company to take over six major U.S. seaports should go forward and he will veto any bill that would stop it.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: 1handwashestheother; blahblahblah; botsusingtheracecard; buchananbrigade; bushbotsbluedresses; bushbotscirclewagons; bushclintonbushclint; bushsellout; clownposse; coulterwillexplode; d; dontworrybehappy; downfallofbush; dubaidubaidu; dubaidubya; dusappersinatizzy; eternalevil; failedcivicsclass; gameoverman; globalists; homelandsecurity; homosexual; howlermonkeys; howlinbots; howlinmonkeys; howlinsgang; hysteriatrain; ilovekeywords; jorgealbush; kneejerk; kneepadsstat; libtard; masshysteria; moonbatsonparade; muchadoaboutnothing; newworldorder; nonstory; openborderbushbots; pantiesinabunch; ports; ratpackattack; ratpackdunces; religionofports; surrendermonkeys; texasholdem; treason; uae; vetothisbutnotcfr; waronterror; wppff; wsayswhatmeworry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,001-1,0201,021-1,0401,041-1,060 ... 3,061-3,079 next last
To: ruschpa
completely tone deaf

Harriet Miers taught me that. And apparently the WH hasn't learned a damn thing from that fiasco.

1,021 posted on 02/21/2006 2:40:44 PM PST by stands2reason (It's now 2006, and two wrongs still don't make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 967 | View Replies]

To: YOUGOTIT



"At least it is not like WW II and the mafia or the Communist are not in charge of the ports."

what would be the difference? If Whabbis managing the ports during the War On Terror is, under the rules, innocuous (as some are saying) then it should have been perfectly fine for the KGB to manage the ports 35 years ago.

The world is either going crazy or getting stupid.

There isn't a terrorist alive that wouldn't be rubbing his palms in glee at the prospect of arabs managing the ports.


1,022 posted on 02/21/2006 2:40:52 PM PST by TalBlack (I WON'T suffer the journalizing or editorializing of people who are afraid of the enemies of freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: antaresequity

Isn't this "strange bedfellows"??


1,023 posted on 02/21/2006 2:41:40 PM PST by X-Ecutioner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Using that old lefty trick of playing the race card to defend insane policies.


1,024 posted on 02/21/2006 2:41:53 PM PST by sangrila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 990 | View Replies]

To: chris1

Great, so we are blackmailed into doing whatever the Arab street wants.


Sounded like it to me.


1,025 posted on 02/21/2006 2:42:06 PM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1019 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

same same same


1,026 posted on 02/21/2006 2:42:27 PM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1020 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

"It's complicated."

No, what's complicated is that if we blow up an insurgent town with 'collateral damage', its legal. But if we capture them, its human rights, and according to the world, we rot in hell. And as Capt Willard said, its like giving out speeding tickets at the indianapolis 500.


1,027 posted on 02/21/2006 2:42:34 PM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1015 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
LOL

He's our resident joker.

1,028 posted on 02/21/2006 2:42:34 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1014 | View Replies]

To: sangrila

dont forget about the leftist tactics used during the miers debate ie those opposed were "sexist"


1,029 posted on 02/21/2006 2:42:39 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite (There's nothing "Mainstream" about the Orwellian Media!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1024 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I think the turnover of the bases in panama was a much bigger deal than the turnover of the canal itself.


1,030 posted on 02/21/2006 2:42:45 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: antaresequity
Cmon BushBots... Lets hear you explain this away...

Why don't you Bush bashers take the lead on this? Oh wait, you already have. Hence the hysterical reaction.

1,031 posted on 02/21/2006 2:43:25 PM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

"dont forget about the leftist tactics used during the miers debate ie those opposed were "sexist""

Our own Howlin said the same.


1,032 posted on 02/21/2006 2:43:43 PM PST by Lauretij2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1029 | View Replies]

To: nmh

If this is the issue that catapults Hillary into the White House, we deserve our destruction at her hands. Keep some perspective. As I see it right now, the real danger is Bush losing his political position if his veto is overridden by Congress. He's risking his entire fortune on one issue, an issue that to me seems overblown. Maybe there's more to it, but right now all I see is hand-wringing and speculation.


1,033 posted on 02/21/2006 2:44:10 PM PST by Cyclopean Squid (History is a work in progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies]

To: onyx; All
Tennis Published: 02/22/2006 12:00 AM (UAE) Salah Tahlak, Tournament Director of Dubai Open Championships, reacts while speaking to Gulf News. Karl Jeffs/Gulf News

Tahlak in favour of appearance money

By Alaric Gomes, Staff Reporter

Dubai: Tournament Director for Dubai Open Championships, Salah Tahlak, has justified the payment of appearance money to top players at the Dubai Tennis Championships.

"It is money well spent and a perfect return on investment for Dubai," Tahlak told Gulf News. "Top players on the Tours draw crowds. These are marquee players. Having them adds to the profile of the event," Tahlak said.

"Players like Agassi, Navratilova and Sharapova have this appeal. Therefore, we don't have problems paying them appearance money," Tahlak shrugged.

Tahlak, however clarified that not all players get the same amount. "The top 10 players normally do. The payment is more like a Persian carpet, each one has a different pricing," Tahlak stated.

"There's nothing great in players being paid, it's a normal thing. Tournaments pay the top players to come and play? all except the Grand Slams," he added.

Case in point

As a case in point, the tournament director illustrated how the staged match between Agassi and Roger Federer on top of the Burj Al Arab brought attention to Dubai. "That stunt was valued at $9.5 million (Dh35 million), while the marketing and public relations returns for the entire event was pinned at $24.5 million," Tahlak disclosed. "This is sound return on the investments."

The profile of tennis in the UAE is set to climb after Tahlak was named an officials on the Dubai Sports Committee headed by Shaikh Hamdan Bin Mohammad Bin Rashid Al Maktoum.

"We need to review the sport here. We need to attract more people and be able to sustain the interest of those who are already playing tennis," Tahlak stated.

He admitted his immediate priorities include sponsorship, marketing and the sustainence of the UAE women in the sport.

"Players like Agassi, Navratilova and Sharapova have this appeal. Therefore, we don't have problems paying them appearance money."

1,034 posted on 02/21/2006 2:44:34 PM PST by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 975 | View Replies]

To: Coop

You were wrong on Meirs, you are wrong on this.

Were it not for the pressure we put on the White House to drop her, she probably would have floated through and everyone be forced to settle for mediocrity.

Instead, we got the right result.


1,035 posted on 02/21/2006 2:44:38 PM PST by chris1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1031 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
I'm curious why there wasn't an eligible and interested US company in the bidding for this deal.

Because no company in the United States does this kind of contract or work. Maybe Halliburton?

1,036 posted on 02/21/2006 2:45:11 PM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Kill 'em til they're dead! Then, kill 'em again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 998 | View Replies]

To: Revel
But one thing is for sure. All of his talent for the cause was lost.

There's a big difference when you are in opposition, and when you are governing. When you are not in power, you don't have to compromise. When you are in power, you have to.

1,037 posted on 02/21/2006 2:45:27 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1018 | View Replies]

To: Trout-Mouth

One world order!

Well they've got to get the Union together...


I wonder if this is how some of the Southerners felt in 1860,only on a smaller scale of course.One last fight for Independence could be around the corner...


1,038 posted on 02/21/2006 2:45:48 PM PST by silentreignofheroes (When the Last Two Prophets are taken there will be no Tommorrow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1001 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

A conservative playing the muslim race card.


1,039 posted on 02/21/2006 2:45:53 PM PST by sangrila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1005 | View Replies]

To: jacquej

Well, I'm pretty sure the admin isn't overly concerned with Israel, except to force them to give up land for (no) peace.


1,040 posted on 02/21/2006 2:45:56 PM PST by Flavius Josephus (LSM: Controversy, Crap, & Confusion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 734 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,001-1,0201,021-1,0401,041-1,060 ... 3,061-3,079 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson