Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Embedded taxes change FairTax analysis
Roanoke.Com ^ | Tuesday, February 07, 2006 | William Donald Tabor Jr.

Posted on 02/11/2006 8:54:52 AM PST by Eaglewatcher

Recent letters have expressed concern that the poor or middle class might be harmed by adoption of the FairTax (www.FairTax.org) based on a deep misunderstanding of both the FairTax and the current system. We cannot assess the effects of the FairTax without comparing it to the reality of our current income and payroll tax system.

One cannot buy a loaf of bread without paying the income taxes of the baker. The price of that loaf of bread contains the cost of the flour, and the income of the baker, but it also contains the taxes the baker pays. After all, the baker does not have a money tree from which to pluck dollars to pay his taxes, he must get those funds from his customers, like any other business.

Further, the price of that loaf of bread contains the taxes of the miller, the farmer, the trucker and the grocer and those of all their employees. Those income and payroll taxes cascade through the production process and eventually make up more of the cost of that loaf of bread than the profits of any of those who worked to produce that bread.

Those many layers of taxes on productive work make up the embedded tax component of the price of bread or any other goods or services we buy. On average, that embedded tax component is 22.4 percent of the price of everything we buy, from a loaf of bread to brain surgery. So, the true tax burden on the working poor is 28.4 percent, (their FICA tax of 7.65 plus plus 22.4 percent of their remaining take-home pay, which goes to pay the embedded taxes hidden in the price of everything they buy).

Even if the poor paid the entire 23 percent FairTax, they would be better off than now, but they don't. The FairTax provides a rebate of all tax paid on spending up to the federal poverty line to everybody. This cancels out all taxes for those living at or below the poverty line, $25,660 a year for a married couple and two children.

For the same family earning twice the poverty line ($51,320), half their taxes are rebated, yielding an effective rate of 11.5 percent. And even at triple the poverty level, $76,980, their effective rate is only 15.3 percent, still far better than the 28.4 percent the poorest of the poor pay now.

So, who loses? The idle rich, illegal aliens, criminals, "off-book" workers and others who escape the current system through evasion or legal loopholes. Tax lawyers and lobbyists who make their livings from the complexity of the current system will also come up short. Foreign goods sold in the U.S. will no longer get a free ride while production of American-made goods and services bear the whole tax burden.

But those of us who work for a living, or who get by on a fixed income, will be far better off.

Tabor, of Chesapeake, is co-state director for FairTax.org in Virginia.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: economy; fair; fairtax; tax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,361-1,367 next last
To: Always Right
I hate when they sell the plan as everyone gets more money and prices come down.

You are the only one providing this hype, strawboy.

61 posted on 02/11/2006 10:08:05 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer

Besides, today the IRS must keep track of all earners...over 100 million people? Even with all the small businesses, there are far fewer than that...so it would reduce the number of folks to monitor, plus making it much more simple to monitor--hence cheating rates should actually go down.


62 posted on 02/11/2006 10:10:40 AM PST by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
Save taxes by eliminating welfare

Where do I sign up? I'm all for it.

63 posted on 02/11/2006 10:10:47 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns

You're basically right - and check the link I gave in #52 to quantify that.

In addition - though often not mentioned - is the fact that the illegal economy which now evades the income tax will becomes losers under the Fairtax since hey'll pay when they buy at retail. In addition, the economy will expand greatly offering far more benefits to most people.

Even the prebate helps many.


64 posted on 02/11/2006 10:12:06 AM PST by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
Honestly, while I might of given it some thought, the "FairTax(tm)" promoters are such a bunch of blockheads that just reading the material makes me want to take a aspirin. There is no correlation between their ramblings and the truth.

Maybe you're not smart enough to understand? Why not indicate something specific?

65 posted on 02/11/2006 10:12:53 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa

No, they're not - at least not the payroll part of things. Payroll costs will be passed on in the cost of things just as at present.

there is plenty of room from the business income tax and compliance cost side of things for prices to drop considerably, though.


66 posted on 02/11/2006 10:14:24 AM PST by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
How does he get the idea that people on fixed incomes, whose fixed dollars will be facing prices that are 15-20% higher for domestic goods and services, and 30% higher for foreign goods, are going to be "far better off" is beyond me.

THere is nothing indicating that prices will be higher at all. There is plenty of evidence indicating the prices will remain nearly constant.

67 posted on 02/11/2006 10:14:34 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
he doesn't ascribe to your foolish notion that prices will be "15-20% higher" which none of you Status Quo Lovers have ever been able to show

If you haven't already seen this thread, you should look here, to see where the whole fallacy of the price drop is exposed as a massive misrepresentation of $1.3 Trillion in revenue which is double counted as both price drops and wage increases:

JORGENSON EXPLODES FAIRTAX MYTH (FR Exclusive)
  Posted by RobFromGa
On News/Activism 08/25/2005 12:40:44 AM EDT · 703 replies · 9,234+ views

68 posted on 02/11/2006 10:15:16 AM PST by RobFromGa (In decline, the Old Media gets more shrill, thrashing about like a dinosaur caught in the tar pits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Principled
Maybe you're not smart enough to understand?

Yeah, OK, if you say so.

69 posted on 02/11/2006 10:17:54 AM PST by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
the illegal economy which now evades the income tax

This illegal economy is paying taxes right now whenever they purchase something at retail-- because they are paying the embedded taxes. THey will continue to pay these same taxes under FairTax but they won't be hidden to use your words.

THings that they buy illegally will still not be taxed under either plan.

70 posted on 02/11/2006 10:18:32 AM PST by RobFromGa (In decline, the Old Media gets more shrill, thrashing about like a dinosaur caught in the tar pits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Eaglewatcher
I like the idea of this tax and it makes a lot of sense. One thing that bothers me is that many will be able to circumvent it. I'm thinking of the many self employed types. It almost seems as though every working man and woman who works for themselves will have to secure a resale permit/number to report sales and collect taxes. Every garage cabinet shop etc could easily circumvent the taxes. Am I overlooking something?

Nam Vet

71 posted on 02/11/2006 10:18:35 AM PST by Nam Vet (The Democrat Party of America is perfectly P.C. * .(* P.C. = Patriotically Challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eaglewatcher

I would think that someone who is idle would spend alot less than someone trying to run a business.


72 posted on 02/11/2006 10:22:11 AM PST by conservative physics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Why not indicate something specific? Can you?


73 posted on 02/11/2006 10:22:52 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Eaglewatcher

Someone please contact me when NOTAX.org is being taken seriously, because the only fair tax is NO TAX!


74 posted on 02/11/2006 10:24:19 AM PST by anonsquared
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
This illegal economy is paying taxes right now whenever they purchase something at retail...

Whose taxes are they paying? Not their own taxes. They're paying for the taxes and tax costs of suppliers in the chain of production.

So currently, the illegal income earner pays only the embedded tax costs in prices we all pay which represent the taxes and tax costs of the production chain. Where do illegal income earners pay their share of FICA and their own income taxes?

THey don't.

Under the nrst they would pay their full share of taxes when they buy legal stuff.

75 posted on 02/11/2006 10:26:51 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Eaglewatcher
Let's try this again. So lets see the Fair Tax will basically remove all taxes business pay (or most). Now we say, for argument sake, will reduce the cost of a loaf of bread by 22%. Now I go in the store and find the loaf reduced by 22% and then the added tax brings it back to the original price. Really helped the hell out of it for me on my small fixed income. Oh, I forgot, my monthly check, without paperwork (Ha), will reduce my overall price of the loaf of bread down to approximately 22% lower that it would have been before the Fair Tax was in effect.

OK, lets try! And hope the hell the business man will voluntary lower the price of that loaf of bread after he has the luxury of paying lower taxes. Whoops, forgot, what is financing the State and Local taxes. I know what is said, but where in the hell do we think it will satisfy the State or Locals. Taxes are sh--................... There is no answer. Get a life. The simplest answer is limit the tax code to one 8 1/2 by 11 page of instructions with twenty blanks to fill out on the one page form to mail in!!!!!!! Cutting BS is always the simplest way.
76 posted on 02/11/2006 10:27:05 AM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

big spending rich people like britney spears will be hit, I doubt some idle rich guy with millions in the bank that does nothing but watch tv all day long will pay a dime.

the people who will really be hit are small businesses who purchase tremendous amounts of products but don't make much profit.



77 posted on 02/11/2006 10:27:49 AM PST by conservative physics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Gadsdenman
It would seem to me that most people with significant savings would also have a sizable IRA or 401k

Actually, the amount of retirment savings inside IRA's and 401 k's dwarfs the amount in taxable accounts. This point has been made to these SQL's (status quo lovers) over and over again but they ignore it because it erodes one of their favorite bogus arguments.

78 posted on 02/11/2006 10:29:37 AM PST by groanup (Shred for Ian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
Really helped the hell out of it for me on my small fixed income.

Are you looking for a tax scheme to help you out personally? That is not the intent of the nrst - it is the intent of the income tax. Support the income tax all day if you like.

And hope the hell the business man will voluntary lower the price of that loaf of bread after he has the luxury of paying lower taxes.

Do you think business will voluntarily lower prices? That would be stupid. He will be forced to do so or go out of business (supposing he's in a competitive market - 'course if he's in a monopoly he already charges what he pleases).

The simplest answer is limit the tax code to one 8 1/2 by 11 page of instructions with twenty blanks to fill out on the one page form to mail in!!!!!!! Cutting BS is always the simplest way.

Where do I sign up? I'm all for this.

79 posted on 02/11/2006 10:31:36 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: conservative physics
the people who will really be hit are small businesses who purchase tremendous amounts of products but don't make much profit.

Can you explain why you believe this?

80 posted on 02/11/2006 10:32:24 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,361-1,367 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson