Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 07/15/2005 10:48:07 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Locked.



Skip to comments.

EXCLUSIVE: US Representative Tom Tancredo in Response to U.S. Nuke Threat: We Could Nuke Mecca
540 WFLA Orlando, FL ^ | July 15, 2005 | Pat Campbell-AM 540 WFLA

Posted on 07/15/2005 9:34:12 AM PDT by underwiredsupport

Exclusive: US Representative Tom Tancredo in Response to U.S. Nuke Threat: We Could Nuke Mecca

15 July 2005: He is a no-nonsense House Representative from Colorado, a staunch critic of the federal government's lax immigration and border enforcement policies, and one who recognizes the clear and present threat posed by Islamic terrorists inside the United States. In an exclusive interview today with Pat Campbell, host of AM 540 WFLA said yesterday he would request a briefing from the Justice Department on information it has on plans revealed by WND this week for a nuclear attack on the U.S. by al-Qaeda. Responding to a question by Mr. Campbell about our possible response to such a threat, Representative Tancredo said that there are things that could be done to pre-empt a threat, and in response to an attack as well. One response would be to take out one of their holy cities with a nuclear bomb if it was clearly proven Islamic terrorists were behind such an attack.

Through the courtesy of AM 540 WFLA and Mr. Patrick Campbell, the Northeast Intelligence Network is offering the audio excerpt from this interview. Click on the link below to download the MP3 audio and listen from your computer. The Northeast Intelligence Network applauds Representative Tancredo for all of his anti-terrorism efforts to keep our country safe. We also applaud Mr. Campbell for asking the tough but necessary questions - AND getting the answers.

Here is the quote from Tancredo!    "What if you said, if something like this happened in the United States, (and it was the result of extremist Muslims) then we could take out their Holy Sites!"

To validate, listen here:

SOUND FILE


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: holysites; nuke; nukemecca; tancredo; votetancredo2008; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261 next last
To: mysterio
Newsweek will pick up the story now, and the psycho terrorists will kill a couple of our guys because of it.

So are you saying we can no longer speak our minds for fear of offending these barbarians? What a state of affairs!

221 posted on 07/15/2005 10:36:20 AM PDT by piceapungens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: alice_in_bubbaland

How can we win the WOT if NOBODY in Washington wants to close the damm borders?
------
A very good question. Well, the losing party is the real U.S. citizen, who is and will suffer even more, our system of laws, our Constitution, our security, respect for our borders, the significance of citizenship, the list goes on and on --- and the adminstration and the rest of Washington (except Tancredo) does not care.


222 posted on 07/15/2005 10:36:24 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: G32

you still haven't answered #153. If the area affected by a nuclear bomb would affect only a few miles over time, what would stop the Muslim world from rebuilding their anthill just a few miles away?

Thus, my point that if that's not the case - that large areas would be contaminated, who's going to pump the oil out of the desert and who's going to let us? China? Woops! They're nuclear, too - and guess what - they need the oil, too!


223 posted on 07/15/2005 10:36:44 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Killing terrorists, or killing innocent people at a holy site? Or are all muslims terrorists?


224 posted on 07/15/2005 10:36:54 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Again, I agree completely. If we have to absorb another significant domestic attack, the federal government is going to have a lot to answer for. And, this time, appointing blue ribbon committees and holding hearings isn't going to cut it. Not by a longshot.


225 posted on 07/15/2005 10:36:55 AM PDT by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Yeah, I'd avoid responding directly, too, if I were you.


226 posted on 07/15/2005 10:37:35 AM PDT by Coop (www.heroesandtraitors.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Dane
See reply #186. pat and bay buchanan are inseperable. No matter your contrary protestations.

You can close your eyes and wish all you want, but neither that link nor your statements change the fact that Pat Buchanan does not run Team America PAC. You've made a false statement and you're still furiously digging that hole.

227 posted on 07/15/2005 10:37:38 AM PDT by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

I think we've learned that all muslims are *potential* terrorists


228 posted on 07/15/2005 10:37:45 AM PDT by piceapungens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
If you idiots produced anything besides straw men, you'd be millionaires.

Get some stripes on your sleeve before calling people you don't know idiots and strawmen you dork. Appeasement a**h**** like you don't grasp the severity of the situation ... a nuclear device is triggered by Islamic terrorists in this country killing hundreds of thousands of American innocents and we shouldn't retaliate? You, dog breath, are a very sick puppy.

229 posted on 07/15/2005 10:37:46 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Dane

"Uh stellar dorkhead bay buchanan is running tancred"

Well, that's it you've persuade us all with your ad hominem logic.


230 posted on 07/15/2005 10:38:26 AM PDT by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
A massive conventional response may be more appropriate.

I have no problem with that. However, the threat of using our massive nuclear arsenal could serve as a deterrant, don't you think?

231 posted on 07/15/2005 10:38:47 AM PDT by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
How can we win the WOT if NOBODY in Washington wants to close the damm borders?

Eagle - that's the $64,000.00 question that demands an answer. I don't think anyone can justify the coddling of Vicente Fox.

232 posted on 07/15/2005 10:39:04 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
How many Islamic extremists make the Haaj every year? How many innocent people were in Hiroshima?

It's a trade off.

233 posted on 07/15/2005 10:39:17 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Dane; Aetius; Spiff

LOL, look at this guy again...he says that Tancredo is a "puppet" of Buchanan...if Tancredo were a puppet of Buchanan, he wouldn't support the war in iraq. If tancredo were a puppet of Buchanan, and Buchanan wanted to "placate" the islamofascists....Tancredo wouldnt have said we should nuke mecca in response to an attack.


Checkmate, Dane. Game over.


234 posted on 07/15/2005 10:39:23 AM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (FAKE conservatism is more dangerous than liberalism <<<---at least you know what you're gonna get!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: underwiredsupport
We're going to find out, sooner or later,

If Abdul will pray, to a glowing crater.


235 posted on 07/15/2005 10:39:41 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
that's the $64,000.00 question

Agreed

236 posted on 07/15/2005 10:39:42 AM PDT by piceapungens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
That's the end of any Presidential aspirations he might have.

He just garnered several votes in my home because of his statement.

They want to murder humans...we want to destroy a building. Can you figure out which is worse?

237 posted on 07/15/2005 10:39:45 AM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
Rutles, I really think these people think that ISLAM is the enemy, not Islamofascism . All Muslims must die. Mohammed Ali, Cat Stevens, Tony Shaloub. That's why it's more important to them to nuke Mecca instead of Tehran.

They won't come out and say it, but what they're advocating gives it away. They have no discernment, no critical thinking skills.

Like I have said before I cannot totally commit to the anti-illegal-immigration side on FR(even though I'm sympathetic to the cause), because I can't stand its spokespeople.

238 posted on 07/15/2005 10:39:45 AM PDT by Warren_Piece (Large buttocks are pleasing to me, nor am I able to lie concerning this matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
I hope that you are misquoting Tancredo.

I went so far as to place a convenient link to the audio file.  For you to imply a misquote means either:

A.    PC Challenged

B.    Still on dial-up

C.    Support OPEN-BORDERS

D.    All of the above.

I'm choosing D.  Am I right!

UWS

239 posted on 07/15/2005 10:40:01 AM PDT by underwiredsupport (...for the shape of things to come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: underwiredsupport

I listened to it. He's just thinking out loud in response to a question.
Considering there is no specific homeland of Islam to strike back at and Islams propensity for targets of symbolic nature, just what else can we use as a deterrent?


240 posted on 07/15/2005 10:41:24 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson