SOUND FILE| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 07/15/2005 10:48:07 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Locked. |
Posted on 07/15/2005 9:34:12 AM PDT by underwiredsupport
Exclusive: US Representative Tom Tancredo in Response to U.S. Nuke Threat: We Could Nuke Mecca 15 July 2005: He is a no-nonsense House Representative from Colorado, a staunch critic of the federal government's lax immigration and border enforcement policies, and one who recognizes the clear and present threat posed by Islamic terrorists inside the United States. In an exclusive interview today with Pat Campbell, host of AM 540 WFLA said yesterday he would request a briefing from the Justice Department on information it has on plans revealed by WND this week for a nuclear attack on the U.S. by al-Qaeda. Responding to a question by Mr. Campbell about our possible response to such a threat, Representative Tancredo said that there are things that could be done to pre-empt a threat, and in response to an attack as well. One response would be to take out one of their holy cities with a nuclear bomb if it was clearly proven Islamic terrorists were behind such an attack. Through the courtesy of AM 540 WFLA and Mr. Patrick Campbell, the Northeast Intelligence Network is offering the audio excerpt from this interview. Click on the link below to download the MP3 audio and listen from your computer. The Northeast Intelligence Network applauds Representative Tancredo for all of his anti-terrorism efforts to keep our country safe. We also applaud Mr. Campbell for asking the tough but necessary questions - AND getting the answers.
Here is the quote from Tancredo! "What if you said, if something like this happened in the United States, (and it was the result of extremist Muslims) then we could take out their Holy Sites!"
To validate, listen here:
So are you saying we can no longer speak our minds for fear of offending these barbarians? What a state of affairs!
How can we win the WOT if NOBODY in Washington wants to close the damm borders?
------
A very good question. Well, the losing party is the real U.S. citizen, who is and will suffer even more, our system of laws, our Constitution, our security, respect for our borders, the significance of citizenship, the list goes on and on --- and the adminstration and the rest of Washington (except Tancredo) does not care.
you still haven't answered #153. If the area affected by a nuclear bomb would affect only a few miles over time, what would stop the Muslim world from rebuilding their anthill just a few miles away?
Thus, my point that if that's not the case - that large areas would be contaminated, who's going to pump the oil out of the desert and who's going to let us? China? Woops! They're nuclear, too - and guess what - they need the oil, too!
Killing terrorists, or killing innocent people at a holy site? Or are all muslims terrorists?
Again, I agree completely. If we have to absorb another significant domestic attack, the federal government is going to have a lot to answer for. And, this time, appointing blue ribbon committees and holding hearings isn't going to cut it. Not by a longshot.
Yeah, I'd avoid responding directly, too, if I were you.
You can close your eyes and wish all you want, but neither that link nor your statements change the fact that Pat Buchanan does not run Team America PAC. You've made a false statement and you're still furiously digging that hole.
I think we've learned that all muslims are *potential* terrorists
Get some stripes on your sleeve before calling people you don't know idiots and strawmen you dork. Appeasement a**h**** like you don't grasp the severity of the situation ... a nuclear device is triggered by Islamic terrorists in this country killing hundreds of thousands of American innocents and we shouldn't retaliate? You, dog breath, are a very sick puppy.
"Uh stellar dorkhead bay buchanan is running tancred"
Well, that's it you've persuade us all with your ad hominem logic.
I have no problem with that. However, the threat of using our massive nuclear arsenal could serve as a deterrant, don't you think?
Eagle - that's the $64,000.00 question that demands an answer. I don't think anyone can justify the coddling of Vicente Fox.
It's a trade off.
LOL, look at this guy again...he says that Tancredo is a "puppet" of Buchanan...if Tancredo were a puppet of Buchanan, he wouldn't support the war in iraq. If tancredo were a puppet of Buchanan, and Buchanan wanted to "placate" the islamofascists....Tancredo wouldnt have said we should nuke mecca in response to an attack.
Checkmate, Dane. Game over.
If Abdul will pray, to a glowing crater.
Agreed
He just garnered several votes in my home because of his statement.
They want to murder humans...we want to destroy a building. Can you figure out which is worse?
They won't come out and say it, but what they're advocating gives it away. They have no discernment, no critical thinking skills.
Like I have said before I cannot totally commit to the anti-illegal-immigration side on FR(even though I'm sympathetic to the cause), because I can't stand its spokespeople.
I went so far as to place a convenient link to the audio file. For you to imply a misquote means either:
A. PC Challenged
B. Still on dial-up
C. Support OPEN-BORDERS
D. All of the above.
I'm choosing D. Am I right!
UWS
I listened to it. He's just thinking out loud in response to a question.
Considering there is no specific homeland of Islam to strike back at and Islams propensity for targets of symbolic nature, just what else can we use as a deterrent?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.