Posted on 07/05/2005 9:37:54 PM PDT by Brian_Baldwin
Tone what down, Mr. Bush? Who are you talking to?
To conservatives?
I think he is.
And I think Laura Ingraham, thinks he is, too.
And, proud of God Knows What, he slighted the conservatives who are suppose to sit around and watch their hair turn white as year after year after year after year betrayal, and now having given so much to put the Republicans and the Bush family BACK in power, who believed the oath Bush gave to church leaders, to conservative leaders, in back door meetings, when lots of money exchanged hands, and money from common people hard earned, and who told the common people all over this nation that he will fight to put a conservative on the bench, and now this from Mr. Peepers he tells us to “tone it down”? Laura Ingraham told Bush tonight, no YOU Bush, you tone it down. Don’t hush us. You hush. You listen. The House, The Senate, The White House, years and years in the making, and now it’s all yours, conservatives who ground down for you, and when it is time, you tell us to tone it down? Squander another 20 years?
Oh, I see. Really. Well, maybe you tone it down Mr. President, or perhaps as some are now calling you Mr. Peepers. Or should I be more respectful?
You tone it down when you talk to conservatives about this vital issue, this nomination to the Court. You better listen. If you told us a lie, you are going to really see who can make hell regarding “Bush Lied”, and it won’t be coming from the Left who are going to make you eat your own words.
You come to the conservatives, to the heroes, to the Patriots, willingly this time. That is more than just good advice, it's real good advice. Respect your family? You respect our families, and everything they have done for you. Your friends? Your loyalties? Who has been your friend, and gave you loyalty? You now need to respect our families, our loyalties. But if you will not approach my friends, my conservatives, with affection, of your own free will, you can take your family and your loyalty to your friends (in power) and you can sit and ride a dead horse right to where you are going, Mr. President.
Don’t you tell me about how the illegal aliens “do the work”, the work that Americans “won’t do”. Don’t you tell me what I would do or not do to support my family. How dare you. And you don’t tell us to tone it down. How dare you, again. Not this time.
Ugly words? You haven’t even heard it yet.
How is Bolton "twisting in the wind". He is still Bush's choice and more than likely be recessed.
President Bush has stood by his nominees. To say otherwise is ridiculous.
Moreover, it is a bit more frustrating when people attack you that are supposedly your allies than it is when people you know are your enemies do so.
Yep, he is expected to do what 42 previous presidents couldn't do and didn't even try to do. Good luck with that.
The last 42 Presidents tried to close the borders?
Read over that again.
That was my point had your knee not jerked your post button. The borders have always been "open"and GW is not going to do what it would effectively take to do so. If he did he would be impeached and rightfully so.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
OK, the last 42 Presidents tried to close the borders and some didn't even try?
What did you get it?
And you will hold your breath until you turn blue too. God what a bunch of 8th graders.
My thoughts exactly----Laura right now has NOTHING to lose by expressing her TRUE thoughts and feelings, completely raw and unvarnished. Dynamite!
Don't reply to me. This is a private introspective mental exercise for those of you who need it. Apparently there are a few of you out there. If I find any replies to this post in the morning, I will respond to you on this thread and in Freepmail with the word "douche", so you've been warned. Just think about what I asked.
If, if, if. The President has done nothing to indicate he would nominate anyone but a conservative. His judicial nominees have been excellent, and there's no reason to anticipate a change.
No, I didn't say we should wait to let the President know that we want the best and most honorable strict constructionists on the Supreme Court. Of course, it's only my opinion but making an overly emotional and disrespectful declaration is far less impressive than a firm and steady petition for well-considered nominees.
Laura is one of my favorite people to listen to, especially on this subject since she's worked at the Supreme Court. She seems to have fallen into the panic trap, which I've heard here and there. But what's the point in being angry when the President is defending a friend as a friend and not necessarily as a nominee?
Except what was written were NOT her words. You will notice that the author of the thread has not made a peep since he posted it.
I was surprised to hear this put this way from Laura but to blame it on those external personal factors you are citing is really a hoot. HYSTERICAL in fact, oh that's so 19th century.
And having said that, it still really doesn't sound like Laura:if the purported subject ("tone it down") relates to Bush's words on the nomination of whomever, it seems like a willful misreading of what Bush most probably meant by that caution.
Uh, what? Texasforever said that none of them did, not that they all did and some of them didn't.
he is expected to do what 42 previous presidents couldn't do and didn't even try to do.
That's a very simple sentence. If you can't understand it, perhaps a basic reading comprehension course is in order.
You said..."The woman scorned, breast cancer, and GOD only knows what else, has melted her brains, because this is juvenile detritus."
I find this post reprehensible.
When you have to get to this level of invective...its more than politics.
See my #95 , posted before I read your # 93 (My, you're quick on the uptake!)
Its a little too early to get riled up about any of this, since we don't even know who the nominee is. The last thing I heard is President Bush wants to nominate someone in the same mold as Thomas and Scalia. That's good enough for me. To paraphrase "hold your fire until you see the nominee's ayes".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.