Posted on 02/15/2005 7:12:00 AM PST by furball4paws
Laboratory Speciation in Helianthus Evolves a Native Species
DNA examination of five species of Helianthus (H. annuus, H. petiolarus fallax, H. anomalus, H. paradoxus, and H. deserticola) suggested that H. annuus and H. petiolarus fallax are the evolutionary parents of the other three species (Rieseberg 1993, 1995, 1993). All five species are self-incompatible and fertile. Typically, H. annuus (the ancestor of the commercial sunflower) and H. petiolarus fallax form hybrids that are almost fully sterile. However, the few fertile hybrids, when subjected to sib-matings and back crossing regimes yield a new species that is fully fertile and cannot cross with either of the parental species. This new species is virtually identical to H. anomalus. The produced species is genetically isolated from the parents by chromosomal barriers. "Under laboratory conditions these changes are repeatable across independent experiments" (Niklas, p.64). The laboratory derived H. anomalus readily crosses with the native H. anomalus. Results indicate that H. deserticola and H. paradoxus may also have arisen via hybridization of H. annuus and H. petiolarus fallax. These two species have different synthetic capabilities from the parents and live in sandier and drier soils. Hybrid speciation may be common in plants where hybrids often form (see Gilia sp., Grant, 1966, Stebbins, 1959, Arnold, 1995), but is presumed rare in animals where hybrids are less common (however, see the minnow Gila seminuda, Bellini, 1994). Experiments to confirm the evolutionary parents of H. deserticola and H. paradoxus have not been performed. 1. Based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA analysis results, the Theory of Evolution predicts that H. annuus and H. pertiolarus fallax are evolutionary ancestors of H. anomalus, H. deserticola and H. paradoxus. 2. Hybrids of H. annuus and H. petiolarus fallax subjected to different regimes (at least 3) of back crossing and sib-matings, all converged into a new plant species with "nearly identical gene combinations" (Rieseberg) as the native species H. anomalus. This confirms the natural evolutionary parents of H. anomalus as predicted.
References 1. Arnold, J and S.A. Hodges. 1995. Are Natural Hybrids Fit or Unfit Relative to Their Parents? Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:67-71. 2. Bullini, L. 1994. Origin and Evolution of Animals by Hybrid Animal Species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:422-6. 3. Futuyma, D.J. 1998. Evolutionary Biology. 3rd. Edition, Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA. 4. Grant, V. 1966. The Origin of a New Species of Gilia in a Hybridization Experiment. Genetics 54:1189-99. 5. Niklas, K.J. 1997. The Evolutionary Biology of Plants. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 6. Rieseberg, L.H. 1995. The Role of Hybridization in Evolution: Old Wine in New Skins. Amer. J. Bot. 82:944-53. 7. Rieseberg, L.H., and N.C. Ellstrand. 1993. What Can Molecular and Morphological Markers Tell Us About Plant Hybridization? Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 12:213-41. 8. Rieseberg, L.H., B. Sinervo, C.R. Linden, M. Ungerer and D.M. Arias. 1996. Role of Gene Interactions in Hybrid Speciation: Evidence from Ancient and Experimental Hybrids. Science 272:741-44.A
Nice, neat, repeatable and meets all scientific criteria for a definitive experiment.
ping
Nice, thanks for posting it.
Ping Gene Wilder, too...
Some definitions:
self-incompatible - the flowers cannot fertilize themselves.
sib-matings - crosses between plants of the same generation.
back crossing - crosses between a plant and its parent or even further back.
hybrid - an individual derived from crossing two separate (but usually related) species. They are typically, but not always, sterile.
A nice, quiet thread about flowers. What could possibly go wrong?
|
I douby that too many creationoids will come out for this - but you never know. They certainly won't be able to say it can't be repeated or their usual mush. It's a nice, tight piece of work.
Observations - theory - predictions - experimental test - BOINK.
Here's mud in your eye!
"Nice, neat, repeatable and meets all scientific criteria for a definitive experiment."
Plant hybridization hardly proves evolution - it is unique to plant "design". Stop wasting bandwidth with this nonsense. This has been debated to death without resolution. All it does is to start endless fights that don't accomplish anything.
OK, that was a particularly obscure reference.
"As the sunflower turns to her God when he sets
The same look that she turned when he rose."
-- Believe Me if All Those Endearing Young Charms
You wan to try and read the thread. A new species was obtained from the crossing of two separate species. I am sorry that is the definition of evolution.
Nice post. Thank you.
One more creationoid remark that I shall anticipate: "Get back to me when you can show a fish giving birth to a bullfrog."
So - are they proof of Evolution, or Abiogenesis?
Actually, as someone who believes evolution and intelligent design are compatible and, most likely, both contributed to the development of life on Earth.... Yes. Actually, it's not proof. It is intelligent design, where we happen to know who the designer is.
Now the question is how much intelligent design has contributed over the aeons.
By the way, clicking on the keyword "speciation" just below the article gives a few other threads that are somewhat relevant. We should remember to use that keyword when it's relevant.
But even bullfrogs don't come out looking like bullfrogs. They look like -- fish. At least for a time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.