To: furball4paws
"Nice, neat, repeatable and meets all scientific criteria for a definitive experiment."
Plant hybridization hardly proves evolution - it is unique to plant "design". Stop wasting bandwidth with this nonsense. This has been debated to death without resolution. All it does is to start endless fights that don't accomplish anything.
10 posted on
02/15/2005 7:22:55 AM PST by
Sola Veritas
(Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
To: Sola Veritas
You wan to try and read the thread. A new species was obtained from the crossing of two separate species. I am sorry that is the definition of evolution.
14 posted on
02/15/2005 7:27:11 AM PST by
furball4paws
(It's not the cough that carried him off - it's the coffin they carried him off in (O. Nash - I think)
To: Sola Veritas
Correct. Otherwise why would USPTO offer
Plant patents? "Variety" is the spice of
LIFE! Clearly another case of wishful independent thinking.
32 posted on
02/15/2005 7:45:09 AM PST by
kinsman redeemer
(the real enemy seeks to devour what is good)
To: Sola Veritas
Plant hybridization hardly proves evolution It just one of the many mechanisms of evolution, and this study is not limited to simply hybridization.
38 posted on
02/15/2005 8:01:02 AM PST by
Rudder
To: Sola Veritas
"Plant hybridization hardly proves evolution - it is unique to plant "design". Stop wasting bandwidth with this nonsense. This has been debated to death without resolution. All it does is to start endless fights that don't accomplish anything." Of course, but everything is unique to "design". In otherwords, goddidit.
No matter what is shown to speciate it will never show the veracity of evolution. Is this close to the truth from your view?
69 posted on
02/15/2005 10:38:59 AM PST by
b_sharp
(Atheist does not mean liberal and Scientist does not mean communist.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson