Skip to comments.
Savage: Impeach Bush over immigration plan
WND ^
| 1-12-04
| N/A
Posted on 01/13/2004 5:54:13 AM PST by JustPiper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 1,361-1,362 next last
To: jim35
You don't need to convince me to vote for Bush in November.
Dubya has a general mutiny on his hands and may not even know it.
WE R N TRUBL
341
posted on
01/13/2004 10:05:44 AM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(Liberty does not tolerate lawlessness and a borderless nation will not prevail.)
To: Modernman
In such a situation, you should resign. If a public official feels that he can't do his job because his personal beliefs conflict with the job, then he should resign. Simple as that. I see you left out my point that Roe v. Wade is UNCONSTITIONAL. The President and AG are sword to uphold the Constitution, not some judge's lame interpretation of it. Anyone who doesn't uphold the Constitution should resign. We are a nation of LAWS not men who can interpret those laws in any lame fashion they want. The President and Congress also have a duty to interpret and uphold the Constitution. They are obligated to defy the courts when the courts defy constitutional principles or make up new ones (like right to privacy or right to sodomy or right to not be offended).
342
posted on
01/13/2004 10:05:46 AM PST
by
exmarine
( sic semper tyrannis)
To: Modernman
In such a situation, you should resign. If a public official feels that he can't do his job because his personal beliefs conflict with the job, then he should resign. Simple as that. I see you left out my point that Roe v. Wade is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The President and AG are sword to uphold the Constitution, not some judge's lame interpretation of it. Anyone who doesn't uphold the Constitution should resign. We are a nation of LAWS not men who can interpret those laws in any lame fashion they want. The President and Congress also have a duty to interpret and uphold the Constitution. They are obligated to defy the courts when the courts defy constitutional principles or make up new ones (like right to privacy or right to sodomy or right to not be offended).
343
posted on
01/13/2004 10:06:05 AM PST
by
exmarine
( sic semper tyrannis)
To: arm958
Jesus Wept. So, it took evil ol' GW to convert a life-long Republican to a liberal-enabler. I have freakin' well heard it all now.
344
posted on
01/13/2004 10:06:46 AM PST
by
jim35
To: T.Smith
I'm doing it because they don't represent me. So you're saying that the Democrats DO represent you?
Because that is exactly what a vote is about -- who will represent YOU; when you withhold your vote FOR SPITE, you are voting against somebody and for somebody else.
Withholding your vote from Bush IS a vote for the DNC, no matter how you dress it up.
Enjoy President Dean/Clark. And I'm sure we won't see you around here after November whining and complaining about the government, right, since you will have made your choice about who will represent YOU! Good luck.
345
posted on
01/13/2004 10:06:53 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: B4Ranch
I did. The forfeiture of employer assests could be phased in over a 3 year period of time. That would allow the Bush guest worker plan to be implemented. At the end of that time if you employed someone without the card, lose your hotel, dairy, factory, farm, etc. The current plan is all carrot, no stick.
To: Howlin
Anyway, he redeemed himself and our family name: he was one of George Washington's aide de camp during the Revolution! WOW!
You must be very proud! Any DAR in your family?
347
posted on
01/13/2004 10:07:40 AM PST
by
TommyUdo
(The Democrat Party-- Proudly Pimpin' off Po' Folk since 1964)
To: Happy2BMe
Just as we all knew: there aren't any.
I've noticed one thing about you since you've been spamming all these threads: you are incapable of answering a direct question put to you.
I believe you're a disruptor.
348
posted on
01/13/2004 10:08:11 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: Modernman
That's the surest road to dictatorship. Following the true intent of the Constitution is surest way to AVOID dictatorship. However, as judges rewrite the Contitutional according to foreign and secular standards, and our rights are disappearing before our eyes, dictatorship is well on its way as we speak, but it will occur precisely because our leaders do not honor the Consitution. You have it backwards.
349
posted on
01/13/2004 10:08:59 AM PST
by
exmarine
( sic semper tyrannis)
To: T.Smith
The last time anyone voted with their conscience, Bill Clinton won the election and subsequent re-election.
To: JustPiper
Unless Bush is holding some details back on his immigration plan...
Put a fork in Bush
351
posted on
01/13/2004 10:09:15 AM PST
by
Vision
(Always Faithful)
To: exmarine
The President and AG are sword to uphold the Constitution If the courts don't decide what is constitutional, then who does? Does every member of the government get to define his own, personal constitution?
352
posted on
01/13/2004 10:09:20 AM PST
by
Modernman
(Providence protects idiots, drunkards, children and the United States of America- Otto von Bismarck)
To: TommyUdo
Tommy - what are the fifth and sixth generation native Americans whose ancestors came from Mexico saying about Bush's new illegal immigration reform in California?
Are they for it?
353
posted on
01/13/2004 10:09:31 AM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(Liberty does not tolerate lawlessness and a borderless nation will not prevail.)
To: Happy2BMe
I believe you're a disruptor LOL. Never a dull moment 'round here. I swear.
354
posted on
01/13/2004 10:09:39 AM PST
by
riri
To: onyx
*Sigh*
But if you and I don't post, what will he have to "say" over there?
He's like one of those little dweeb kids who never gets picked for anything and stands outside with his nose pressed up against the window pane, desperate to be involved, with nobody paying him any attention.
355
posted on
01/13/2004 10:10:18 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: TommyUdo
Me!!
356
posted on
01/13/2004 10:10:47 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: Modernman
"...He is (a Freemason), actually. He's never been all that into it, though. I hear he's a serious Stonecutter, though..."
No way! Really? Man, that is too funny! The black helicopter crowd is gonna go apesh*t!
357
posted on
01/13/2004 10:11:20 AM PST
by
jim35
To: riri
Wondered how long it would take him - he's a bit tardy on this one - unusual for him.
358
posted on
01/13/2004 10:11:47 AM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(Liberty does not tolerate lawlessness and a borderless nation will not prevail.)
To: BigSkyFreeper
Well, earlier in the thread you were acting as if it was set in stone "Since when does a trial balloon become an impeachable offense" was my first quote on this thread. I think you misunderstood me.
#75
359
posted on
01/13/2004 10:11:58 AM PST
by
m1-lightning
(Weapons of deterrence do not deter terrorists; people of deterrence do.)
To: BigSkyFreeper
Well, earlier in the thread you were acting as if it was set in stone "Since when does a trial balloon become an impeachable offense" was my first quote on this thread. I think you misunderstood me.
#75
360
posted on
01/13/2004 10:12:07 AM PST
by
m1-lightning
(Weapons of deterrence do not deter terrorists; people of deterrence do.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 1,361-1,362 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson