Skip to comments.
My Take on The Big Bang
Posted on 09/05/2003 9:24:29 PM PDT by russianteen
I know that this is a commonly debated topic, and we all know what the truth is *wink wink*, but I feel like ranting about it anyway. We have all heard about the big bang, but i'd like to explain it all anyway. According to that theory, all matter was condensed into one point, and that was the universe. There was nothing outside it. The one point in the universe was everything, and one day it exploded. That, along with the rest of the theory, seems seriously flawed.
For an explosion to happen, one or more forces have to act upon another group of forces. According to the big bang theory, there were no outside forces, or anything else outside the universe. There was no outside. Yet there was a big boom that eventually led to the creation of planets, stars, and of course us. hmm...nothing wrong with the theory yet?
One thing that I have thought about is if there was a big bang from one central point, if all matter wasn't incinerated from the start, it would all fly in a different direction from a single starting point. All chunks created by the explosion, however big or small, would go outward in its own way a nothing would come into contact with anything else. This would make galaxies or any clusters of spacial objects impossible to prove.
I'm going into my freshman year in high school in a few days and i don't think my opinion will be popular with most of my peers and teachers. sigh...damn liberals...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: musings; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
post comments! If I'm wrong about something tell me!
To: Consort
To: russianteen
To: russianteen
You cannot be 13. Are you?
4
posted on
09/05/2003 9:27:24 PM PDT
by
At _War_With_Liberals
(If you mention Clinton, please use the syntax: Clinton (an accessory to 9-11))
To: conservativecorner
Moab Bump! They're talking about the MOAB!
To: russianteen
Well the singularity is kind of a simplified explanation. Many people are pushing toward the "no beginning" idea. Bascially with relativity as an item aproaches light-speed time appears to slow down. So if you were to wind back the clock you'd never get to the starting point because as each object fled at extrordinary speed it distorted time.
Of course I'm tired and I probably butchered that explanation.
There's also the hypothesis that matter doesn't exist quite as we know it and the universe is mearly the result of something outside of normal space-time.
6
posted on
09/05/2003 9:32:33 PM PDT
by
Bogey78O
(The Clinton's have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured/killed -Peach)
To: russianteen
Welcome to Free Republic, kid.
7
posted on
09/05/2003 9:33:58 PM PDT
by
blam
To: At _War_With_Liberals
actually im 14 lol. also, about what some other people said. 1-this is ONE view on the big bang. Some are even more absurd. On TechTV one theroretical physicist actually said that when there is absolutely nothing, some sort of explosive bubbles appear, and eventually cluster up and explode. I'm dead serious. Also, im new to FR so please explain what a bump is... :)
To: russianteen
I'm going into my freshman year in high school in a few days and i don't think my opinion will be popular with most of my peers and teachers.Opinions are never popular with teachers. For many reasons.
As for the Big Bang? Observational time is too short to support any theory. Could be the expansion phase of bang, bang, bang where the universe pulses eternally inward and outward. Or the 'expanding' universe could just be an observational anomaly. Or we could just be a single atom in a grain of sand that just got smashed with a hammer by a very (very) big kid playing with his dad's tools.
What works is real. Whether you are navigating one of our starships between stars, or galaxies, or trying to locate a specific star with a telescope, or flying between planets in the solar system, you need a model of the universe that allows you to use its' particular mathematics to accomplish your feat successfully. Choose the model (theory) that suits your purpose and go with it (BTW, the flat earth model works quite well for navigating an automobile between cities. No theory is obsolete, they just get forgotten as a theory).
9
posted on
09/05/2003 9:38:04 PM PDT
by
templar
To: russianteen
im new to FR so please explain what a bump is... It's what ya get on your head for posting vanities.Just kidding!!!!! Just kidding!!!!
My questions for the big bang theory: Who made what blew up, and who made it blow up? ;-)
Hb
10
posted on
09/05/2003 9:39:22 PM PDT
by
Hoverbug
(whadda ya mean, "we don't get parachutes"!?!)
To: russianteen
there are also beliefs (BELIEFS!) that the "Big Bang" is a cycle: that is, the universe expands out, but since space is slightly negatively curved, it continues contracting into a "big crunch" as Hawking likes to call it. When it reaches it's smallest point it simply folds over itself and starts expanding again in the "big bang" fashion you're familiar with.
and that's just one of their crackpot theories.
11
posted on
09/05/2003 9:41:26 PM PDT
by
pianomikey
(piano for prez)
To: Hoverbug
huh? lol...
To: pianomikey
heh that big crunch theory makes me hungry
To: Bogey78O
Let's say for the heck of it, that some race was created in this universe or some former universe - that one of its members became so intellectually advanced and got so bored that he wanted to create his own universe - and he threw all of these gases and gravity in motion so that he could watch it all come together to see what would happen.
In some parts of this universe that he threw together, life was created and he watched it grow, letting each living entity develop on its own to see what would happen. Each entity and it's progeny was left to it's own ability to grow and develop - or destroy itself.
Just think - if you had immortality and the capability to do anything you wanted - what would you do with your time?
I think this explains both theories.
14
posted on
09/05/2003 9:45:56 PM PDT
by
M. Peach
(eschew obsfucation)
To: templar
Opinions are never popular with teachers. For many reasons.Reasons like it interferes with their work of turning you into a complacent, compliant sheep...Opinions are for the elite, the movers and shakers. All others should just keep quiet and do what they're told, think what they're told, and never question authority or an elite.
15
posted on
09/05/2003 9:47:56 PM PDT
by
nobdysfool
(All men are born Arminians...the Christian ones that grow up become Calvinists...)
To: russianteen
The Big Bang is just an interim theory until a better one comes along. It doesn't matter, anyway. The start of the universe was a one-time event and we missed it. It's time to get over it.
16
posted on
09/05/2003 9:49:11 PM PDT
by
Consort
To: Physicist
Ping
17
posted on
09/05/2003 9:51:02 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: Mr. Mojo
what does ping mean...?
To: russianteen
Consider Fractured Symmetry.
20
posted on
09/05/2003 9:57:58 PM PDT
by
D-fendr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson