Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Astronomy Picture of the Day 6-12-03
NASA ^ | 6-12-03 | Robert Nemiroff and Jerry Bonnell

Posted on 06/12/2003 5:09:07 AM PDT by petuniasevan

Astronomy Picture of the Day

Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.

2003 June 12
See Explanation.  Clicking on the picture will download
 the highest resolution version available.

Cyg X-1: Can Black Holes Form in the Dark?
Credit: I. F. Mirabel and I. Rodrigues (IAFE, SAp/CEA)

Explanation: The formation of a black hole from the collapsing core of a massive star is thought to be heralded by a spectacular supernova explosion. Such an extremely energetic collapse is also a leading explanation for the mysterious cosmic gamma-ray bursts. But researchers now suggest that the Milky Way's most famous black hole, Cygnus X-1, was born when a massive star collapsed -- without any supernova explosion at all. Their dynamical evidence is summarized in this color image of a gorgeous region in Cygnus, showing Cyg X-1 and a cluster of massive stars (yellow circles) known as Cygnus OB3. Arrows compare the measured direction and speed of Cyg X-1 and the average direction and speed of the massive stars of Cyg OB3. The similar motions indicate that Cyg X-1's progenitor star was itself a cluster member and that its path was not altered at all when it became a black hole. In contrast, if Cyg X-1 were born in a violent supernova it would have likely received a fierce kick, changing its course. If not a supernova, could the formation of the Cyg X-1 black hole have produced a dark gamma-ray burst in the Milky Way?


TOPICS: Astronomy; Astronomy Picture of the Day; Science
KEYWORDS: blackhole; cygnus; star
Uh oh. Looks like we don't know as much about the dynamics of black hole formation as we thought.

Wouldn't it be amazing if high-mass stars just collapse and VANISH?

Finding ashes of first stars
HUBBLE EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY INFORMATION CENTRE RELEASE
Updated: May 2, 2003

Recent observations with the Hubble Space Telescope suggest that the first stars formed as little as 200 million years after the Big Bang. This is much earlier than previously thought. Astronomers have observed large amounts of iron in the ultraluminous light from very distant, ancient quasars. This iron is the "ashes" left from supernova explosions in the very first generation of stars.


Artist's impression of a quasar located in a primeval galaxy (or protogalaxy) around 900 million years after the Big Bang. Astronomers used the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope to discover substantial amount of iron in three such quasars. This is the first time that anyone has found elements believed to have been created exclusively by the first generation of stars. Credit: European Space Agency and Wolfram Freudling (Space Telescope-European Coordinating Facility/European Southern Observatory, Germany)
 
We do not know exactly how and when galaxies, stars, and eventually planets formed in the early Universe. Astronomers look back in time to these early years by observing objects so remote that their light needs thousands of millions of years to travel to Earth. These objects provide clues about conditions in the early Universe.

Stars are nuclear factories that process lighter elements such as hydrogen and helium to successively heavier elements such as nitrogen, carbon, and finally iron. New observations with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope show massive amounts of iron in very distant and ancient quasars. This pushes the era of the very first stars in the Universe back to as early as 200 million years after the Big Bang (corresponding to a redshift of around 20). This is much earlier than previously thought and is in agreement with recent results from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe.

In October 2002, a team led by Wolfram Freudling used Hubble's infrared instrument, NICMOS (Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrograph), to observe three of the most distant quasars known (redshifts 5.78-6.28). The light from these three quasars had travelled for 12.8 thousand million years before reaching Hubble's spectrograph. It had left the quasars 900 million years after the Big Bang. The spectra show clear signs of the large amounts of iron. This is the first time that elements created in the first generation of stars are found.


The remote quasars SDSS J083643.85+005453.3, SDSS J103027.10+052455.0, and SDSS J104433.04-012502.2, as observed with the NICMOS (Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrograph) instrument on board the Hubble Space Telescope. The quasars are shown in the centre of each image and are some of the most distant quasars known (redshifts of 5.82, 6.28, and 5.78). Quasars are some of the most exotic and ultraluminous sources known. They are powered by supermassive black holes in their centres. Credit: European Space Agency and Wolfram Freudling (Space Telescope-European Coordinating Facility/European Southern Observatory, Germany)
 
Wolfram Freudling comments "Iron is a good indicator of the evolutionary state of a quasar. This element is not created during the Big Bang but in stars later on. These stars have to form, burn their fuel and explode before iron can be detected. This process takes times, up to 500 or 800 million years. This is the reason why we believe that the iron we detected with Hubble was created in the very first generation of stars which formed soon after the Big Bang."

Hubble's position above the atmosphere allows it to detect the infrared region of the spectrum that includes iron's signature at about 1.6-1.7 microns. This range is normally absorbed by the Earth's atmosphere and unavailable to Earth-bound telescopes.

The detection of iron so early in the Universe's history has profound implications. "The presence of iron, and, by implication, all other lighter elements, shows that basic ingredients for planets and life were present, at least in some places, very early in the history of the Universe. This is much earlier than the formation of the Earth itself 4.6 thousand million years ago," says team member Michael Corbin.

These results also suggest that the first stars formed before the super-massive black holes that power the quasar engines in the centres of galaxies. Other observations have shown that the first quasar engines started slightly before 900 million years after Big Bang. The first stars would therefore appear to precede them by several hundred million years. The creation of the black holes themselves still remains a mystery, although the birth date of the first stars may prove to be a very valuable clue.

This is the first major scientific result to emerge from the NICMOS instrument that was revived during the Hubble Servicing Mission 3B in 2002. Servicing Mission 3B was the last successful mission of the Space Shuttle Columbia that was lost on 1 February. The authors would like to respectfully dedicate this paper and the discoveries therein to the memory of the crew of the Space Shuttle Columbia.

The team is composed of W. Freudling (ST-ECF/ESO, Germany), M. R. Corbin (CSC/STScI, United States), and K. T. Korista (Western Michigan University, United States).

The team announced their discovery in the 20 April 2003 issue of Astrophysical Journal Letters.

1 posted on 06/12/2003 5:09:07 AM PDT by petuniasevan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MozartLover; Joan912; NovemberCharlie; snowfox; Dawgsquat; viligantcitizen; theDentist; ...

2 posted on 06/12/2003 5:10:09 AM PDT by petuniasevan (Wonders of the Universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
Thanks for the ping
& good morning
3 posted on 06/12/2003 5:19:25 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
Thanks for the ping!
4 posted on 06/12/2003 5:23:07 AM PDT by GodBlessRonaldReagan (where is Count Petofi when we need him most?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
could the formation of the Cyg X-1 black hole have produced a dark gamma-ray burst in the Milky Way?

We're probably unaware of 90% of what is happening in our stellar neighborhood. The other 10% we're aware of, but we don't know what is actually happening.

-Thanku, Doctor Ocular.

5 posted on 06/12/2003 9:23:39 AM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
Thanks!
6 posted on 06/12/2003 12:53:13 PM PDT by sistergoldenhair (Don't be a sheep. People hate sheep. They eat sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson