Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Westerfield Jury Reaches Verdict DEATH
o | Joe Hadenuf

Posted on 09/16/2002 1:46:27 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf

Death


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 701-704 next last
To: Joe Hadenuf
"Dude!! Yer goin' to hell!"

....Ok, sorry for being un-pc...

61 posted on 09/16/2002 2:26:17 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven
We may be a bunch of barbaric neanderthals, but at least we know how to spell "forty-seven".
62 posted on 09/16/2002 2:26:38 PM PDT by murdoog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: demsux
Maybe, but I'm not as dumb as David Westerfield, who went to a bar one night, got aroused by an adult woman, then proceeded to kidnap, rape, and murder her little daughter. Didn't he know where to find one of the hundreds of prostitutes in San Diego? A guy that dumb doesn'tdeserve to live.
63 posted on 09/16/2002 2:26:49 PM PDT by Palladin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Ed B.
Capital punishment will do 3 things. In addition to the 2 you named, we have a third: He's sure not going to do it again.

The death penalty is really effective against recividism.
64 posted on 09/16/2002 2:27:36 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
FROM OTHER THREAD!





Westerfield gets DEATH in Van Damn murder
Court TV


Posted on 09/16/2002 3:47 PM Central by Hillary's Lovely Legs


DEATH PENALTY!!!!





TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Click to Add Topic
KEYWORDS: DANIELLE VAN DAM; DAVID WESTERFIELD; DEATH PENALTY; WTF; Click to Add Keyword


[ Report Abuse | Bookmark ]






1 posted on 9/16/02 3:47 PM Central by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

The jury in the Westerfield trial has just announced their decision for sentencing.

David Westerfield has received the DEATH PENALTY. He can get the needle or gas in California.


2 posted on 9/16/02 3:48 PM Central by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

Thats good but when was the last time they put someone to death in California?


3 posted on 9/16/02 3:48 PM Central by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; redlipstick

Who'd have thunk it?


4 posted on 9/16/02 3:49 PM Central by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: areafiftyone

Juror number one has had to leave the court room and get air. They have signed the death warrant.

Sometimes jurors can't cope with the decision and need counselling for years after a death penalty verdict.


5 posted on 9/16/02 3:50 PM Central by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

If they really execute him I will be surprised. California is just like New York when it comes to the Death penalty. He could be on death row forever (I hope not).


6 posted on 9/16/02 3:53 PM Central by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; redlipstick

Now it's jurors one and two who had to go outside and throw up.


7 posted on 9/16/02 3:53 PM Central by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

Luckily there were more men than women on the jury. Women tend to be soo forgiving.


8 posted on 9/16/02 3:53 PM Central by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: areafiftyone

Let this be a lesson to pedophiles and murders. We don't kid around.


9 posted on 9/16/02 3:53 PM Central by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: OldFriend

How do you figure?


10 posted on 9/16/02 3:54 PM Central by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: OldFriend

We do not - I simply cannot forgive you for that statement -I have to throw up now ;-)


11 posted on 9/16/02 3:55 PM Central by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: Spunky; Ditter; ChiefRon; Starshine; UCANSEE2; Mrs.Liberty; demsux; Jaded; skipjackcity; BARLF; ...

New thread in news.... ping


12 posted on 9/16/02 3:55 PM Central by ~Kim4VRWC's~
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

Than you should have wanted him in the prison GP. Dahmer would still be alive if he would have got the Death Penalty.


13 posted on 9/16/02 3:55 PM Central by L,TOWM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

Is it just me, or did this case get prosecuted with (relative) blistering speed? Don't most cases of this visibility take YEARS to even GET to trial? I'm not complaining, mind you -- I'm actually pleased. I think I remember reading why this came to trial so quickly, but I don't remember what the reason was.


14 posted on 9/16/02 3:55 PM Central by TrappedInLiberalHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: OldFriend

Whatever you meant, it was 6 and 6 on the jury.


15 posted on 9/16/02 3:56 PM Central by redlipstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

Wish this was taking place in Texas - he'd be on the table now - they don't pussyfoot around in Texas.


16 posted on 9/16/02 3:56 PM Central by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]





previous thread from today


17 posted on 9/16/02 3:57 PM Central by ~Kim4VRWC's~
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: cyncooper

A when-you-get-back ping.


18 posted on 9/16/02 3:57 PM Central by redlipstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: TrappedInLiberalHell

that's because his atty filed a motion to set aside the longer timeframe and hurry it up... like OJ


19 posted on 9/16/02 3:57 PM Central by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: areafiftyone

"Stephen Wayne Anderson, 48, was executed at San Quentin State Prison on January 29, 2002 at 12:01am for the 1980 murder of Elizabeth Lyman. Anderson was one of 607 people on California's death row. "


20 posted on 9/16/02 3:58 PM Central by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: All

I always see these Westerfield threads with hundreds of replies - what the heck do people talk about? (Serious question)


21 posted on 9/16/02 4:00 PM Central by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: Senator Pardek

Didn't you know... Westerfield has a following here on FR and many seem to think he's innocent...


22 posted on 9/16/02 4:01 PM Central by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

It took him 21 years on death row to get executed. He was sentenced in 1981. Lets see - Westerfield should be executed in 2043.


23 posted on 9/16/02 4:02 PM Central by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: marajade

He's being framed by jack-booted thugs don't you know... ;-)


24 posted on 9/16/02 4:02 PM Central by Isle of sanity in CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

This is serious stuff, I can understand that reaction. I would probably have to throw up just from the stress & strain of the situation, not from guilt or feeling I had done something wrong. I'd be crying & have a headache too, I guess I'm a wuss. ;9[ I wouldn't take being involved in a trial like this lightly.


25 posted on 9/16/02 4:02 PM Central by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: areafiftyone

It takes so long to die in California,a person could die waiting


26 posted on 9/16/02 4:03 PM Central by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: woofie

Oh well I guess we'll be watching 60 minutes do an interview with Westerfield in about 10 years.


27 posted on 9/16/02 4:04 PM Central by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: OldFriend

Luckily there were more men than women on the jury. Women tend to be soo forgiving.

Maybe to strangers, but "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned" comes to mind when considering forgiveness factors.


28 posted on 9/16/02 4:06 PM Central by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

So we can expect the execution of a 70 year old Westerfield in approximately 2022.

Danielle would have been 29 by then.


29 posted on 9/16/02 4:09 PM Central by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: Hillary's Lovely Legs; FresnoDA

Fresno DumbAss and Koolaid Drinkers-- don't go out and slash your wrists yet. Your boy Dave needs you to bake cookies and bring them to him for the next 20 years--FOOLS!

I only wish that Brenda could administer the lethal shot, when the time comes.


30 posted on 9/16/02 4:09 PM Central by Palladin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: All

Some may elect to come back and be interviewed by the media, but the anonymity will be lost. They do not have to use their name, occupation etc., but their image could be made public. They can try to figure out a way to be interviewed without camera.

For those who don't want to talk to anyone about the case, according to state of california, they don't have to.

Judge thinks he knows who was following the jurors around.



31 posted on 9/16/02 4:12 PM Central by ~Kim4VRWC's~
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




To: All

I wonder if the jurors will talk to the attys...

Judge says the atty's only have about 45 minutes to talk to jurors.


32 posted on 9/16/02 4:13 PM Central by ~Kim4VRWC's~




OTHER FORUMS DISCUSSING THIS CASE, THE DEATH PENALTY ETC.


http://www.websleuths.com/cgi-bin/dcf/dcboard.cgi?az=list&forum=DCForumID5

http://www.webbsleuths.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=list&forum=DCForumID3&conf=DCConfID1
65 posted on 09/16/2002 2:27:55 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
You are not worth my time or energy
66 posted on 09/16/2002 2:28:48 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Even he looks better now...
67 posted on 09/16/2002 2:29:41 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
No, not really. Most of them have been banned already.
68 posted on 09/16/2002 2:30:26 PM PDT by L,TOWM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Hard to believe anyone could support this guy. The evidence was all there......
69 posted on 09/16/2002 2:31:57 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

Comment #70 Removed by Moderator

To: Joe Hadenuf
I'll bump that !! Worth repeating too !

Congrats to the California jury.......

71 posted on 09/16/2002 2:32:59 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Did anyone get a look at the defense attorneys face, I had to leave the room, and missed any images of that idiot.
72 posted on 09/16/2002 2:34:08 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Are any of the jurors being interviewed?
73 posted on 09/16/2002 2:34:58 PM PDT by vacrn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Truth to tell, I would like to see FDA's reaction to this.

Have any of the juror's aggreed to interviews. What's on Court TV?

What does Rick Roberts have to say?

Have the Van Damms made a statement?

News!!!! I want more news!!!!

Anyone?!?
74 posted on 09/16/2002 2:36:22 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: vacrn
Don't know for sure....
75 posted on 09/16/2002 2:36:38 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
Court TV is lawyers talking to lawyers.
I'll keep my eyes open for juror interviews.
76 posted on 09/16/2002 2:37:52 PM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: vacrn
The judge told the lawyers to conduct the interviews, as apparently he didn't want any involvment.

But I can tell you, they will all be saying the same thing. LOL
77 posted on 09/16/2002 2:38:23 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

Comment #78 Removed by Moderator

To: Palladin
Well, that post didn't stay long. Better tone it down a bit..don't want to get the entire thread pulled.
79 posted on 09/16/2002 2:40:08 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Hard to believe anyone could support this guy. The evidence was all there......

What they did was to take each piece of evidence separately and come up with alternate possibilities for each one. By doing so they convinced themselves that their was reasonable doubt.

If you take apart any event in minute detail its possible to do the same. I found it a very interesting example of otherwise logical thinkers being led astray by over analyzing stuff. I once used an example of a man caught in bed with a naked woman to show I could use their same logic to prove them man didn't have sex with her despite eyewitnesses and DNA evidence. By deconstructing the event into its smallest pieces one can rationalize all sorts of impossible to prove scenarios.

There is also another group who is incapable of convicting on circumstantial evidence. The jury was selected by weeding such folks out first.

80 posted on 09/16/2002 2:40:50 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 701-704 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson