Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Van Dam Jury Update, Monday August 12th: Westerfield's Fate Lies In Mudd Instructions?
Court TV ^ | August 12, 2002 | Court TV

Posted on 08/12/2002 6:39:08 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Photo

Jury's time
Jurors will resume deliberations Monday in the capital case of David Westerfield, who is accused of killing 7-year-old Danielle van Dam


DAY TWO: FRIDAY, AUG. 9, 2002
12 noon ET    Jury enters jury room.

2:30 p.m. ET    Jury goes home for the weekend.

DAY ONE: THURSDAY, AUG. 8, 2002
1:10 p.m. ET    Jury begins deliberating. After two months of testimony, the capital murder trial of David Westerfield is in the hands of the jurors, who began their deliberations following more than two days of closing arguments.

2:50 p.m.   Jury sends a note to the judge.

3:00 p.m.   Jury at lunch.

4:30 p.m.   Judge calls the lawyers but not the public or the press into the courtroom.

5:15 p.m.   Judge says jurors sent note asking to deliberate five days a week instead of having Friday off and he approved their request.

7:00 p.m.   Jury goes home for the day. Will return Friday morning.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: 180frank; vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 701-703 next last
To: the Deejay
Juror #1 Juror #1 = Hiccup.
141 posted on 08/12/2002 12:02:22 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
One big difference I see between the photograph of Damon and the sketch, is that the man in the sketch has a round face whereas Damon's face is more rectangular. I'll admit that there is resemblence but the drawing is not that close.
142 posted on 08/12/2002 12:06:57 PM PDT by theartfuldodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA; All
Hi..FRES..yeah, in that kind of a mood...abit "somber".

Actually, I've been trying to compose an opus to Court TV. Nancy Grace hit skid row today, when she complained because the Jury dared to take a lunch break.

"I have my sandwich at my desk" she says. She gets substantially more than $15 bucks a day, I would bet the farm on it, LOL!

When we get the "warning" the verdict has been reached, I will turn to FOX news and ONLY switch to CTV if there is an acquital or the jury is hung..to watch them come unglued.

NO MORE COURT TV as long as Lisa Bloom, Beth Karas and Nancy Grace are there. They don't care if we hate them, as long as we watch.

So switch channels, guys...and let the sponsors know why.

sw

143 posted on 08/12/2002 12:11:12 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
Profile of Juror #1 Juror #1 in the pool. A woman who works as a welfare-eligibility worker for San Diego County. During jury selection, she expressed concerns about the behavior of Brenda van Dam, the victim's mother.

FWIW, beth carass (sp?) the other night on geraldo (i think) was asked what she could tell us about the jurors and the only thing she said was that juror #1, a woman, seemed to be very interested whenever feldman was speaking and very uninterested with dusek (big shock)and she felt this woman was likely to be on the defense-side

144 posted on 08/12/2002 12:14:31 PM PDT by Tiger28
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: All
Have any of you had the stomache to read Dusek's closing
arguments?

I'd like to know if he said (or eluded to) DW killed Danielle *in* her bedroom? If he did, then all that business about her being raped in the RV really doesn't hold water. (It doesn't even make a good fairy tale.)

Feldman said Dusek said that & he was knocked back by the judge.
145 posted on 08/12/2002 12:16:45 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: the-gooroo
Don't you think there would be some evidence on those comforters of a rape of a child?

Have we told you today that you're a genius?

The drycleaning not killing DNA info is from a New York Times article about Monica's stained dress. It specifically said that detergent can kill DNA, but not drycleaning alone.
146 posted on 08/12/2002 12:18:01 PM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Today is the anniversary of the murder of Nancy Grace's fiancee many, many, many years ago. She mentioned that earlier today. You guys can hate Dusek (no problem), I hate Nancy Grace. I don't like Damon either.
147 posted on 08/12/2002 12:18:48 PM PDT by I. Ben Hurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Tiger28
That last sentence has stuck in my mind for weeks & weeks. I've never heard of a juror make a statement even similar to it, in any trial. (I've seen hundreds of trials and heard about a lot of jurors, their actions/remarks, etc.)
148 posted on 08/12/2002 12:20:03 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: spectre
If its a not guilty verdict, I'm turning on CTV to witness the un-glueing!!! I don't want to miss that. Of course if its guilty I won't be able to stand the smugness that will surely follow. I'm hopeing for not guilty on Nasty's watch.
149 posted on 08/12/2002 12:24:28 PM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: I. Ben Hurt
"You guys can hate Dusek (no problem), I hate Nancy Grace. I don't like Damon either.

Ditto. (But I hate Dusek, too.)

150 posted on 08/12/2002 12:24:50 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: the-gooroo
Question--IIRC there was no DNA found on the comforters and pillow shams/cases that were drycleaned. Is that correct? --- Someone posted the other day that drycleaning doesn't degrade or eliminate DNA. (can't remember who,sorry) Don't you think there would be some evidence on those comforters of a rape of a child? The prosecution wants us to believe she was raped in that motorhome and the comforters were taken to the cleaners to get rid of DNA evidence. Any thoughts on this?

Here are some thoughts.

The comforters were taken to the cleaners to get rid of the DNA.

Why did the DNA (which would have to include body fluids, blood, if Danielle was raped/killed on them) DISAPPEAR due to DRY CLEANING?

BUT, the 'jacket', even though going through the same dry cleaners, not only had DNA, but it was PERFECT. HAD NOT DEGRADED at all.

My biggest question is whether the jacket the police 'found' DNA on was the jacket he dropped off on 02/04 or whether it was the one dropped off on 01/26 ???????????????????????????????????????

151 posted on 08/12/2002 12:26:27 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: gigi
I'll be watching ctv just to see the exploding heads! (With that Not Guilty verdict.)
152 posted on 08/12/2002 12:29:30 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Blue Screen of Death
send me $20 bucks and I will tell you 8 numbers that WILL NOT be drawn on the next lottery. No problem, I do it all the time

Yeah, me too. I keep trying anyway.

153 posted on 08/12/2002 12:30:08 PM PDT by I. Ben Hurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
I'd like to know if he said (or eluded to) DW killed Danielle *in* her bedroom?

Dusek would never argue the theory that Danielle was killed in her own bedroom. The place of her death is a problem for him, and he left it open intentionally.

154 posted on 08/12/2002 12:30:22 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: theartfuldodger
You're right, some of the angles of the face are not similar. What keeps jumping out at me, though, are the eyebrows and the flat-in-the-front face. I don't know how to say what I'm trying to describe, but when you look at someone in profile, and there's basically a smooth plane with a nose sticking out a bit, as opposed to a protruding chin or full lips or prominent cheekbones or bulging forehead. More flattened-off like a bulldog face (not dog-like, but just that all the features protrude about the same amount).
155 posted on 08/12/2002 12:30:52 PM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
What does dagblad mean? Daily Bugle?
156 posted on 08/12/2002 12:31:03 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
I wonder how many times thier heads will spin before the explosion?
157 posted on 08/12/2002 12:32:08 PM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: bvw
And was Orwell an atheist or an agnostic?

I seem to recall Orwell making a statement that "he hoped he was right" about being an atheist; in my book, that makes one an agnostic (greek = 'no knowledge'). REAL Atheists (greek = 'no deity'), from what I have seen on some of my favorite dust ups here on FR, have a faith that would put many of my brothers and sisters in Christ to shame.

You know, after 9/11 I think the whole world moved beyond where Orwell ever got to, do you?

I don't know about beyond--but closer, definately closer.

158 posted on 08/12/2002 12:32:54 PM PDT by L,TOWM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: bvw
"Day-leaf" ie daily "leaf" as in "sheet" of paper.
159 posted on 08/12/2002 12:33:00 PM PDT by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
I think that Feldman was just trying to carry out Dusek's wild theory to its logical conclusion (this piece of the closing came when Feldman was trying to show the jury how absurd Dusek's theory was). Danielle didn't scream or make any noise when DW supposedly grabbed her, so she MUST have been dead. Either that, or she knew the person who took her. I could be wrong, but that's the way it seemed to me.
160 posted on 08/12/2002 12:34:58 PM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 701-703 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson