Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: alexandria
Samantha's Mom is really holding every member of that Jury responsible for her daughter's death.

I don't know WHY the Jury let Avila off, if the two girls came forward and witnessed that he did in fact, molest them. I can't see that Avila had an attorney of Feldman's class, maybe even a public defender, but the Prosecutor didn't present a strong enough case to convict the first time. So the Jury is blamed? I don't know....

And I can't judge how Mantha's Mom is feeling, except to say, I don't blame her for saying ANYTHING at this time.

OTOH, Samantha's Murder and Now Cassie's Murder come at the worst possible time for DW.

If the Jury were sequestered and couldn't watch the news, listen to Rick Roberts and read the papers, they wouldn't feel the pressure to go forward and convict... but now, (and I don't care what anyone says to the contrary) they will feel it's their duty to find him guilty, lest they suffer the consequences if down the road, he commits an act of violence.

The jury is tainted, and Westerfields right to a fair trial have been violated, IMHO.

sw

407 posted on 07/26/2002 3:53:30 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies ]


To: spectre
I don't know WHY the Jury let Avila off, if the two girls came forward and witnessed that he did in fact, molest them.

These are the hardest kinds of cases to prosecute. There apparently was no physical evidence, as he molested them by playing with their privates while bathing them.

Juries in southern Calif. may be gun shy to convict on only the word of the children because 20 years or more ago a daycare owner and workers in S.Calif. were convicted of molesting and all kinds of gross things. It turned out to be all false happenings.

Some of the things the children told of were the most awful things you could imagine. These ideas were planted in their minds by some social worker. The jury believed the children.

410 posted on 07/26/2002 4:13:19 PM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies ]

To: spectre
I don't blame her for saying ANYTHING at this time.

I know, you can't, it's just so sad.:(

OTOH, Samantha's Murder and Now Cassie's Murder come at the worst possible time for DW.

If the Jury were sequestered and couldn't watch the news, listen to Rick Roberts and read the papers, they wouldn't feel the pressure to go forward and convict... but now, (and I don't care what anyone says to the contrary) they will feel it's their duty to find him guilty, lest they suffer the consequences if down the road, he commits an act of violence. The jury is tainted, and Westerfields right to a fair trial have been violated, IMHO. sw

I could not agree more.

414 posted on 07/26/2002 4:37:07 PM PDT by alexandria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies ]

To: spectre
"OTOH, Samantha's Murder and Now Cassie's Murder come at the worst possible time for DW."



sw


407 posted on 7/26/02 6:53 PM Eastern by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]


Unbelievable.

417 posted on 07/26/2002 5:09:00 PM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies ]

To: spectre
I don't know WHY the Jury let Avila off, if the two girls came forward and witnessed that he did in fact, molest them. I can't see that Avila had an attorney of Feldman's class, maybe even a public defender, but the Prosecutor didn't present a strong enough case to convict the first time. So the Jury is blamed? I don't know....

Could it even be the standard for "beyond a reasonable doubt?"

637 posted on 07/27/2002 12:09:20 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson