Skip to comments.
Movies or shows I won't watch because of who is in them
Posted on 07/19/2002 7:11:34 AM PDT by robjna
As hollywood continues to beleive acting qualifies you as an expert on current affairs, I find myself not being able to patronize their movies. I once heard a quote that it used to be that fame brought celebrity, but now celebrity brings fame. here is my list of hollywood idiots who I cannot bring myself to watch in a movie or anymore. Lets add yours to the list:
Julia Roberts (top of my list, cannot stand the wench)
Richard Dreyfuss
Cammryn Mannhein
Rosie O Donut
Sharon Stone (not for political views, just a horrid actress)
Rob Reiner (anything he is involved in)
Tom Cruise (stero typical hollywood flake)
Nicole Kidman (see Above)
Bill Maher (enough said)
Help me expand my list
An obscure actress , upon recieving an award, stated that in days of yore, actors were considered rogues and vagabonds, and that we should still considered ourselves in that light. she was insightful beyond her years.
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 281-282 next last
To: Bill Davis FR
I saw Paul Newman the other day, and I hardly recognized him ! He has gotten old, and it's hard to understand him when he speaks. How old is this guy, anyway ?
To: GSWarrior
You would really go see a movie about stamp collecting? I would rather see a movie with Alec Baldwin in it than a movie about stamp collection.
222
posted on
07/19/2002 11:10:23 AM PDT
by
okkev68
To: GSWarrior
If people choose not to see movies, for whatever reason, what difference does it make to you or anyone else. Movies are certainly not vital to anyone's life, nor ar they life changing. Most are pure fantasy. If you like to see them-fine. if you don't like movies with
a@@holes in them don't go. It's simple. If Hollywood goes broke It wouldn't bother me in the least.
223
posted on
07/19/2002 11:10:30 AM PDT
by
bfree
To: Dick Bachert
I just read that in
Imprimis just yesterday. God bless Pat Sajak. I don't guess he will witn any popularity contests in Hollyweard.
Hollywood finds it very carefull not to encurage people to smoke, polute, and stray from what is PC, but they have no problem spreading immoral and bankrupt lifestyles. Pat's speech deserves it own post. Thanks.
224
posted on
07/19/2002 11:13:52 AM PDT
by
oyez
To: bfree
It doesn't matter to me at all. I think we are in agreement on this (non)issue.
To: robjna
Don't forget Ed Asner.......the boss on old Mary Tyler Moore show. That guy makes Castro seem like a patriotic American.
Good list......I like list's of seditious socilaist's.
Stay Safe !
To: GSWarrior
Now let's suppose that Alec Baldwin stars in a movie about stamp collecting. I am faced with a choice of seeing the movie about a subject I am devoted to, or passing on it because Baldwin is in it. I would choose to see it, in spite of Baldwin's presence. My choice would be to first find out if it was a good movie. If so, then I would decide whether or not to make the effort of seeing it. Since I have some friends who see every movie that comes out (yes, even the bad ones), that saves me time, effort, and money whenever the movie stinks (which is most of the time).
To: GSWarrior
"
Let's say for the sake of discussion that I am an avid stamp collector.."Let's say that I shoot guns. Hollywood makes a movie about guns. After they totally screw up the history, use and tactics of guns, I don't bother going to see a movie about guns again. Then Hollywood makes another movie about guns and I already learned my lesson the first time, and I tell people on a website that I don't care to see Hollywood screw up a subject that I'm familiar with. ETC.
To: dfwgator
Hanks said he regretted giving 10,000 to Bill Clinton's campaign. He then said he regretted giving 10,000; that 20,000 would have been better.
While I think he's a great actor, I haven't and won't go to his movies
229
posted on
07/19/2002 11:45:01 AM PDT
by
Tymesup
To: Shooter 2.5
Put Travis Tritt on the good guy list. I saw him in Lake Placid on 7/13/02. During his rendition of Sweet Home Alabama, his lyric was "Clinton, does your conscience bother you?" He followed up with "Hillary, that goes for you, too!"
230
posted on
07/19/2002 11:49:22 AM PDT
by
Tymesup
To: jokar
"Yeh, I heard Otis was a closet Marxist, but only when he was sober.
Maybe that's why he drank."
I remember all those episodes when Otis would come staggering into the sheriff's office, raise his fist and slur the words, "Workers of the world, unite!", and then pass out in one of the cells...
231
posted on
07/19/2002 11:55:07 AM PDT
by
Exeter
To: HairOfTheDog
"I don't want to keep track of the political correctness of my soup, toilet paper, music or movie actor. Hi, HairOfTheDog. I agree that it's true that you can't keep track of the political opinions of everyone who trades in the free market. But if the CEO or the board of my toilet paper or soup companies begin publicly and loudly supporting left wing politics or the Clintons, then, yes, actually, I'm going to find other products.
"There are some on this very thread that actually think they can hurt the careers of popular actors by not going."
Well, that's like saying you're not going to vote because you only have one vote. There have been some very successful product boycotts and letter writing campaigns, some quite recently.
To: HairOfTheDog
"I don't want to keep track of the political correctness of my soup, toilet paper, music or movie actor. Hi, HairOfTheDog. I agree that it's true that you can't keep track of the political opinions of everyone who trades in the free market. But if the CEO or the board of my toilet paper or soup companies begin publicly and loudly supporting left wing politics or the Clintons, then, yes, actually, I'm going to find other products.
"There are some on this very thread that actually think they can hurt the careers of popular actors by not going."
Well, that's like saying you're not going to vote because you only have one vote. There have been some very successful product boycotts and letter writing campaigns, some quite recently.
To: robjna
I'm surprised Redford hasn't been mentioned or even more significant, any of the fatcat producers who really control what goes on the screen - the redstones, the Weinsteins, etc are the ones who control what gets made and written and they are for the most part anti Christian and political leftists though the Clinton kind, not the Marxist kind.
Hollywood faces a crisis of identity. At this point most of its revenues come in from international revenues and so there is a need to pander to international audiences. Second, the H'wood establishment understands however that films and stars (after all the star system is a creation of Hollywood) have to craft a pro American but anti authoritarian message to the world, that somehow, America is wonderful when leftist values prevail and when America "feels the pain." Finally, there is an element that despicably and deliberately undermine America through its movies. Most often this happens in the indie world where directors can bash Amrieca and get away with it. Redford through his Sundance Institute promotes this kind of underground rebellion but indie films have gone nowhere and Hollywood knows it. That's why they refrain from openly anti American moviemaking.
To: Corin Stormhands
"But my interpretation of "live, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," allows me to read the things I want, watch the things I want, eat the things I want and buy the things I want because I enjoy them."
Well, I don't know. Our system gives me the right to enjoy some things, I think it also gives me the responsibility to oppose some things.
To: Sam Cree
Our system gives me the right to enjoy some things, I think it also gives me the responsibility to oppose some things. I agree. And if something or someone truly offends you, then you have the rigth to make another choice. My point is simply that I can disassociate the peformer with the agenda. If there's a movie I want to see, I'm not going to check out the performers political resume first...
To: Exeter
Will Geer (Grampa Walton) was an avowed Communist. But The Waltons always struck me as a great show.
http://www.indianahistory.org/pub/traces/geer.html
To: okkev68
What do you think they are doing with all that cash and publicity they receive from all the people who watch their shows and movies? umm, maybe paying bills, buying homes and cars and other neccesities, and niceties.
Thats what I would do with the money made off royalties.
To: Corin Stormhands
"My point is simply that I can disassociate the peformer with the agenda."
Yeah, I'm just having a good time snobbily thinking about what jerks I think some of these artists are. There's some good art out there that ought to be appreciated.
I wish someone would figure out why the art world is so leftist. Being leftist means you have to conform (as political correctness makes obvious); artists take pride in being free spirits.
Also, I believe there are some folks who call themselves liberals that are pretty decent human beings in spite of their idiotic politics. I think Jimmy Buffet may be one. I listen to his stuff anyway.
To: RooRoobird14
That is just a bad movie vs bad personal opinions.
These "performers" would keep their mouths shut if it affected their acting income. People do not care what an actor or actress thinks. The bottom like is they have no power other than their personality on the big or little screen.
tom cruise ofends a nation but people still go to see minority report. what her name insults the oscar audience and no one cares about her the folloing day. Remember the history of the ancient theater and its social commentary. Not much has changed except for actors and actreses forgetting what it is they do and who they are.
If they want to comment, save it for the screen. If we as an audience approve we will throw you a few coins.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 281-282 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson