The Free Republic He-Man Women Hating Club

[Hillary's Lovely Legs]

Let's just come clean and call Free Republic what it really is.... The He-man Women Hating Club.

Here is a SMALL sampling of the absolute hate for women on this forum. I won't paint all men with a broad brush, because I have known and met some fabulous men here who truly treasure and cherish women, and ***gasp*** even respect them!!!!

So let's clean up our act, shall we fellas? Notice the vile things that are said about women here on a daily basis.

Don't say ..." I really love women, but they are all a bunch of feminazis who screw over men and want their money and kids". It takes two to tangle, guys. All your problems are not our fault.

CHILD SUPPORT As Theft (Disguised Alimony): The Feminist Idea Of Independence Is She Takes His Money

A 'Marriage Strike' Emerges As Men Decide Not To Risk Loss

Things Women Do That Annoy Men

Women Who Can't Cook

Looking for love: Dr. Laura Schlessinger reveals why fewer men are interested in marriage

The Marriage Trap

MARRIAGE TO SAUDIS - A guide book for American Born Women. The Embassy of Saudi Arabia

Why White Men Prefer Asian Women

Are U.S. Women Totally Clueless or What?"

This one needed 3 threads

A plea to single women

A please to single women II

A plea to single women III

When good women do nothing

Gendergap.org

What's up with White Women?

[HairOfTheDog]

Nomination for quote of the day.

Thanks... glad you liked it ;~D

[NYpeanut]

Oh, my goodness gracious, you are so clever. There's even a bit of a strut in your waddle.

[buccaneer81]

So how do we solve that? he should pay some support costs, but I would propose it should be half of the documented costs of the child each month... not an entitlement to the mother, but an actual discussion about what the child needs, and the cost should be split in half.

No way! Makes too much sense. We need to elect women with your views to Congress. That may be the only way out of this mess.

[Jhoffa_]

I would simply be happy if custody wasn't a foregone conclusion and people who explicitly violate their marriage vows (beating, adultery, etc..) were not shown bias simply because of their sex.

I also think support should be reasonable and with regard to assets it should be as fair and just as possible.

No "givvies" just because you are a poor woman who's husband "made you cheat" by working too late. And likewise, no bias for men who can't keep themselves from juping in the sack with the babysitter.

Nu-uh.

Equality and fairness before the law.

[splach78]

Very well said.

[Jhoffa_]

That would be a big step in the right direction.

I mean, as it is a woman with custody can starve your child and spend "HER" support check on drugs or anything she pleases.

There is no control built in here at all to ensure the child is indeed being supported.

[Tennessee_Bob]

Hey! I found it! The first mention of men killing women on the Marriage Strike thread...

http://www.freerepublic.com/fo cus/chat/711656/posts?page=159 #159

[Jhoffa_]

Oh, my goodness gracious, you are so clever. There's even a bit of a strut in your waddle.

And to think, you imply that I am a "knothead"

[Jhoffa_]

But speaking of painting with a broad brush, do make sure and write that comment to the many men who paint with broad brushes, will ya?

Hey, I am not out to slander all women. Nor an I out to provide others with excuses for cheating on them or divorcing them.

I want fairness in our courts.

That's it. No gender bias here.

[HairOfTheDog]

I believe you said that you married a good man who does not do these things. Presumably you married a reasonable person, and you have been reasonable yourself, and the two of you have worked it out.

Why isn't that the answer? If you want a reasonable marriage, marry a reasonable person. A solution worked out amongst ourselves, without turning this into a men against women battle of the hosehold chores?

[SouthernFreebird]

So how do we solve that? he should pay some support costs, but I would propose it should be half of the documented costs of the child each month

It's already that way here in NC.....we fill out a costs form and it is divided between the parents,support going to to the one raising the child/children....guess thats why I never saw any bias in favor of women.

[Jhoffa_]

Uh oh.. Follow the link in #267 and look what pop's up.

What sane woman would want any of the hateful misogynists posting here? Why don't you just go forth and kill all the women and make the world perfect? ~Posted by "Dark Mirage"

And you have the nerve to accuse "men" (I love that BROAD term) of wanting to "Kill You" and Women in general?

Lady, I am sorry to say this but.. You're nuts.

[HairOfTheDog]

I mean, as it is a woman with custody can starve your child and spend "HER" support check on drugs or anything she pleases.

There is no control built in here at all to ensure the child is indeed being supported.

Must we bring in the freaky fringe here? Most divorces are not in fact, angels versus satan him/herself, they just try to make it seem that way when the heat is turned up.

I agree that the kid should be with loving parents, and I think we should spend a lot less time arguing about who is "better" or "worse" and more time sharing the raising of the child that was created. This is an impossible situation. It is why marriage is not supposed to end except in extreme situations where the devil is clear.

Most of the time their is no devil. But each side now chooses to describe the other as the devil incarnate in court, while outside there is a toddler who is living proof that the couple used to like each other.

The marriage ending (or failing to begin) is when the distaster started. Not in court.

[HairOfTheDog]

That's a funny question for this board, considering that EVERYTHING is up for discussion on this board. I truly wonder about your angle.

My angle? - was I too obtuse? - What is wrong with what I said?

[Jhoffa_]

Must we bring in the freaky fringe here?

What's "freaky" about it? It's the truth. There ARE no controls to ensure that your child is actually supported.

And as far as the he said / she said business goes I think I would rely a whole lot less on hersay and a whole lot more on facts. Like:

Who left? Any Police Reports? History of substance abuse? Criminal history in general? Been divorced 5 previous times? Did you steal or misappropriate money to finance your "escape" from this evil spouse? Did a PI catch you in the sack?

Things which are a little more black and white than: "Am not!" "Are so!" "Am not!"

And if fault can't be determined for some reason, then divide assets fairly. No givvies.

But if it can be determined, then that person caused the problem and they should get the short end of the stick.

[HairOfTheDog]

No way! Makes too much sense. We need to elect women with your views to Congress. That may be the only way out of this mess.

Naw... Congress would drive me nuts... a system perfectly designed to make sure nothing coherent ever gets decided... It would take a benevolent dictatorship... But thanks!

[Rebelbase]

"The only conclusion I can draw is that they want their bias and they want it now and they don't want justice NOR do they care what you want. "

Here, here. You called it correct. Its kind of like femminist affirmative action.

We all know how fair and just affirmative action can be.

[Jhoffa_]

Its kind of like femminist affirmative action.

Bingo.

The perfect term for those who carry their politics between their legs.

[HairOfTheDog]

But that is the freaky fringe...

Most marriages end because of boredom. There are no police reports, no drug abuse, PI photos, no devil. Just people that forgot half their vows. People are divorcing for NO reason at all... Now what do we do?