[Big Guy and Rusty 99]

comments?

[Zachary1985]

People on this forum should be able to post thier opinion on any issue as long as it stays clean. There is absolutely no reason to get rid of 'Bush Bashers'. Wouldn't this forum be boring if there was never any dissent? Personally I don't think a forum would be any fun unless thier could be some level of argument.

[Fred Mertz]

Who should JimRob ban first?

I think I need to find some of that Kool Aid you're drinking.

[Texasforever]

Look. don't let them get to you. I for one am glad they are around. It gives us something to kill time with until more important things come about. Most of them are just inarticulate malcontents that allways see the horse manure and never the pony. Let them rant. They only prove the old adage that “it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt“..

[PhiKapMom]

I did essentially the same thing you have done with this on another thread yesterday. Here is Jim Robinson's reply to me on that thread:

To: PhiKapMom
Well, we're gonna take a lot of flak over the next several months, but I can guarantee you that when it comes election day, most of these people are going to vote for Republicans as their reps. No right thinking FReeper would ever sit it out and allow a Democrat to take office. And, in 2004, you can bet that we'll all be pulling for Bush over Gore, Daschle, Hillary, et al (well, all but one percent or so). Jim

594 posted on 6/5/02 10:26 PM Central by Jim Robinson

That was enough for me! I appreciated his comments and made me even more determined to make sure the Bush Bashers do not take over this forum! We need to fight their bashing with facts which doesn't seem to be too hard to do. Truly believe a lot of them are infiltrators from the DemocRATS who pretend to be conservatives.

We need to expose these bashers for who they are and the Agendas they have!

[185JHP]

Some of the worst of them are suffering from diseased nodes in their brains - they have anarchist and/or druggietarian leanings and reflexively go into attack mode when the fever runs high. I prefer the "Jesse Jackson options" re them and their spewings: laugh at them, and then ignore them. What do they know about what's good and clean and decent and honest and fair and right? FReegards

[Conservababe]

What is your definition of Bush Bashing?

[JennysCool]

There are much easier, and more American, ways of getting the Bush-Bashers. If you disagree, post your disagreement -- or do like I do most of the time: grin ruefully at their post, shake your head, and move on down to the next post. Chances are it might be more to your liking. The first word in Free Republic is Free, it would be wrong to compromise that.

FReegards!

[Dan from Michigan]

Disagree 100%.

This is a CONSERVATIVE forum, not a BUSH forum.

I voted for him in 2000. My vote in 2004 is up for grabs.
If he signs a freedom grab like the Patriot Act, I can't attack him? I'll attack him for his refusal to support armed pilots. I'll slam him for his CFR cave. I'll slam him for his vagueness. I'll praise him when he's right too, like his tax cut.

I call them as I see them. Period.

[mercy]

I'm sickened to the depths of my soul by the duplicity of George W. Bush. His father was a traitor to the Reagan Revolution and he himself cannot even spell the word.

He is a pol. A creation of Carl Rove and a man without a center. He will do anything for political expediency and is incapable of even following the lead of a man like Ronald Reagan. I doubt W could even recite to us a FEW of the great accomplishment of Reagan.

We are adrift as a nation, caught up in self destructive naval contemplation and "what did who know and when did they know it?" rather than aggresively prosecuting a real war on terrism. And why are we in this mess. Because we have no leader. We have an empty suit for a president.

[gc4nra]

Your profile page states that you are pro 1st Amendment. I don't understand how you can reconcile that fact with this post.

[VRWC_minion]

They are without a doubt disprupters. Its time for Jim to weed the garden.

[Kermit]

Gee, you can't beat our arguments, so you want to shut us up. Good plan.

90% of the so-called "Bush-bashing" is pointing out, how Bush says one thing and does another. The other 10% is pointing out the inaction by Bush on things he ought to be doing. As one, who criticizes Bush, I want him to do, what he said he was going to do. It's good for America, it's good for the GOP, it's good for Bush's re-election.

The mystery is why he's doing the things he is. There's no rhyme or reason to it. There's no "political necessity" to it. The total lack of decent reasons, for what he's doing is a big part in what's driving people here nuts.

Why did Bush come out for a Palestinian State after 9/11 and reward terrorism? Why is Bush saving Arafat's butt for 8 month or longer? It's against the Bush Doctrine. It doesn't make any sense.

[Torie]

Bush bashers are already quite emasculated, and fully contained. What we have now is a suggestion for overkill, which might degrade the energy of the forum. If everyone on this forum loved Bush, it might become quite boring, and lifeless. Debate is good. The key is to cull out those that engage in ad hominen attacks, or just post stuff totaly devoid of any substantive or factual content with the sole purpose to annoy.

[Ragin1]

Does the emporer wear clothes?

[america-rules]

You're taking this site too serious.

Most of the posters are in their little world and probably don't even vote because they don't like any of the choices.

No amount of logic or arguing will change their minds so stop trying because they thrive on the debate.

The mainstream conservative isn't on the fringe like some of these posters so don't take what they say as the norm.

The ones who use shrub, daddy's boy, dumbya etc. are the imposters so ignoe these and they go away !

If you ever see a post by murrymom it's a post from a commie so totally ignore it !

[Republican Wildcat]

With all do respect, JimRob and the Moderators have been doing an excellent job keeping this place fairly stable and have indeed banned the most extreme militants that had been on this forum with great success. This post does not further the cause of stability and invites a flame war.

[Sabertooth]

When this infighting happened in 1992, Bill Clinton got elected.

And what caused the infighting?

[diotima]

If all of Bush's political decisions are above reproach then you should have no trouble fending off the "Bush Bashers."

[primeval patriot]

Having been here since about Dec. 97 I can't say I've seen anything out of the ordinary.

[Spiff]

Ban THIS, Bushbot!