Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New Hobbit Hole

Posted on 03/14/2002 5:07:26 AM PST by HairOfTheDog

Welcome to The New Hobbit Hole

Concerning Hobbits

The New Hobbit Chronicles

This is a continuation of the infamous thread New Zealander Builds Hobbit Hole originally posted on January 26, 2001 by John Farson, who at the time undoubtedly thought he had found a rather obscure article that would elicit a few replies and die out. Without knowing it, he became the founder of the Hobbit Hole. For reasons incomprehensible to some, the thread grew to over 4100 replies. It became the place for hobbits and friends of hobbits to chit chat and share LoTR news and views, hang out, and talk amongst ourselves in the comfort of familiar surroundings.

In keeping with the new posting guidelines, the thread idea is continuing here, as will the Green Dragon Inn, our more structured spin-off thread, as soon as we figure out how to move all the good discussion that has been had there. As for the Hobbit Hole, we will just start fresh, bringing only a few mathoms such as the picture above with us to make it feel like home, and perhaps a walk down memory lane:

Our discussion has been light:

It very well may be that a thread named "New Zealander builds Hobbit hole" will end up being the longest Tolkien thread of them all, with some of the best heartfelt content... Sorry John, but I would have rather it had been one with a more distinguished title!… post 252 - HairOfTheDog

However, I can still celebrate, with quiet dignity, the fact that what started as a laugh about some wacko in New Zealand has mutated and grown into a multifaceted discussion of the art, literature, and philosophy that is Tolkien. And now that I've managed to write the most pompous sentence of my entire life, I agree, Rosie… post 506 - JenB

Hah! I was number 1000!! (Elvish victory dance... wait, no; that would be too flitty) … post 1001 - BibChr

Real men don't have to be afraid of being flitty! Go for it. – post 1011 – HairOfTheDog

Seventeen years to research one mystical object seems a bit excessive… post 1007 - JenB

Okay...who's the wise guy who didn't renew Gandalf's research grant?… post 1024 – Overtaxed

To the very philosophical:

…Judas Iscariot obviously was a good man, or he wouldn't have been chosen to be one of the Apostles. He loved Jesus, like all of the Apostles, but he betrayed him. Yet without his betrayal, the Passion and Crucifixion would never have occurred, and mankind would not have been redeemed. So without his self-destruction infinite good would not have been accomplished. I certainly do not mean this to be irreverant but it seems to me that this describes the character of Gollum, in the scenes so movingly portrayed above… Lucius Cornelius Sulla

To fun but heartfelt debates about the integrity and worth of some of the characters…

…Anyone else notice how Boromir treats the hobbits? He's very fond of them but he seems to think of them as children - ruffling Frodo's hair, calls them all 'little ones'. He likes them, but I don't think he really respects them… post 1536 - JenB

Yes... Tolkien told us not to trust Boromir right off the bat when he began to laugh at Bilbo, until he realized that the Council obviously held this hobbit in high esteem. What a pompous dolt… post 1538 - HairOfTheDog

…I think almost every fault of his can be traced directly back to his blindness to anything spiritual or unseen. He considers the halflings as children, because that is what they look like. He considers the only hope of the ring to be in taking it and using it for a victory in the physical realm. He cannot see what the hobbits are truly made of, he cannot see the unseen hope of what the destruction of the ring might mean--the destruction of Sauron himself, and he cannot see the unseen danger that lies in the use of the ring itself… I just feel sorry for Boromir--he is like a blind but honorable man, trying to take the right path on the road but missing the right path entirely because he simply cannot see it… post 1548 - Penny1

Boromir isn't a jerk, he's a jock… post 2401 – Overtaxed

-----------------------------------------

Oh, I think by the time Frodo reaches the Cracks, he's not even himself anymore! I think he's not only on the brink of a dangerous place physically, he's on the brink of losing himself completely during the exchange with Gollum. But for some reason, the take-over isn't complete till he actually has to throw the Ring in. The person speaking to Gollum is not Frodo, but the "Wheel of Fire" that Sam sees. After the Ring is destroyed, Frodo not only comes back to himself, but comes back with the unbearable (to him) knowledge of what it's like to be completely without compassion. I think that's why it's so important to him to be compassionate in the Shire… post 2506 - 2Jedismom

…Regarding Frodo's compassion... it's a little too much at the end. Even Merry tells him that he's going to have to quit being so darn nice. But you're right. He's learned a lesson about evil that very few ever learn since it wasn't an external lesson but an internal one. (Those kinds of lessons have the greatest impact) Not only did he totally succumb to it, but he was rather ruthless to my little Smeagol… post 2516 - carton253

Well that Frodo was a big mean bully! (to Smeagol)… post 2519 – Overtaxed

So as you can see, everything JRR Tolkien (and Peter Jackson) is welcome here in our New Row, our soon-to-be familiar New Hobbit Hole…; philosophy, opinion, good talk and frequent silliness.


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Chit/Chat; Poetry; TV/Movies; The Hobbit Hole
KEYWORDS: 2jmbombadil; allyourprecious; balroghotwings; bearspamandeggs; blowitoutyershorts; breecheese; buffdragons; cartonofspam; cherofthedog; closetsneakers; corinhonestsnaig; corinspamfunkle; corinspamhands; depraveddwarves; dwarfdeodorant; dwarfdiapers; dwarfgaloshes; dwarfkingcorinspam; dwarfspamwiches; dwarftossing; elffriends; elfspam; elvesruleforever; elvishfootfetish; emoryuniversity; endlesschitchat; foolofatook; frododigspipeweed; funklestormhands; fuzzycritters; giddygnadspam; girlyarmor; gnadbelchspam; gnaddwarfhunk; gnadspam; gnadthreadkiller; gollumthegreat; gondorianspamogram; goodbyeoldhole; greeneggsandspam; hobbitschmobbit; holediggingwomen; hotdogsmartypants; itcomesinpints; itsourhagspam; itsourspamnow; jenbneinerspam; jenmcsspam; keeblerelves; khazaddumdedumdum; ksenlovesspam; ksenshamelessspam; ksensneakspam; ksenspamaddict; latenightfunklators; lilspammer; lordoftherings; lordofthespam; lorenahobbit; menareweak; michaeldobbs; midgetporn; namariejensneak; nanowrimosneak; oblivionspam; orclust; otdefunklator; oversneakspamtax; pints; pippintook; pointyelfshoes; politerosespam; precious; preciousparty; preciousspam; rightwingpsychospam; rightwingspamsneak; rightwingsuperspam; rmdbreakfastspam; rmdlembasspam; rmdospam; rosiespamangel; ruthlesssnootyelves; rwrfannyspam; samwisethebrave; scottish; seamusspamfist; sissyelves; skivielessgondorian; smeagingsneakol; smeagolthesupreme; sneakingspam; sneakle; sneakping; sneakses; sneaktaxoverspam; snoots; snowpants; spameggssausagespam; spamfreesneaking; spamisnotprecious; spamminghair; squarehandspampants; stormsneakspamhands; stormspamsneakpants; superstarsmeagol; teasedhair; threadvandals; toking; tolkien; tricksesthieveses; twerentbear; twopantsdupree; velveeeeeeeta; weescarves; whistlinghobbits
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 23,681-23,70023,701-23,72023,721-23,740 ... 48,321-48,323 next last
To: Overtaxed
...and we wants it!
23,701 posted on 09/04/2002 10:14:37 AM PDT by Overtaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23695 | View Replies]

To: Overtaxed
...and we wants it!
23,702 posted on 09/04/2002 10:14:38 AM PDT by Overtaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23695 | View Replies]

To: RosieCotton
Squirrels!
23,703 posted on 09/04/2002 10:15:26 AM PDT by Overtaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23702 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom
No problem, 2JM...we'll keep an eye out for you over at the Yahoo Hole. Check in on us once in a while, and enjoy the extra whistle time!
23,704 posted on 09/04/2002 10:18:06 AM PDT by RosieCotton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23675 | View Replies]

To: RosieCotton; Overtaxed
Sheesh! Turn your head for one minute to see if Iraq is glowing yet, and look what happens...
23,705 posted on 09/04/2002 10:19:11 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23700 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
New Moon already?
23,706 posted on 09/04/2002 10:21:40 AM PDT by Overtaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23705 | View Replies]

To: Overtaxed
New Moon already?

Not until Saturday. But I'm like a kid waiting for Christmas...

23,707 posted on 09/04/2002 10:23:39 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23706 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Right, but our job is to convince the rank and file, not the wacko fringe... so talking to them about power grabs and totalitarian regimes makes us look absolutely crazy to the person who just likes to look at the pretty river on her way to work.

We have to adjust our arguments to reflect the desired audience... the voters and citizens. That is what the left does. They talk to kids about greener places and show pictures of endangered species. There's is a prettier solution than ranting about UN land grab oppression. We are killing ourselves with the voters ad pushing them more and more into the hands of those with the better sales pitch.

We aren't talking to ELF. We aren't going to convince them first. We are talking to people who see strip malls where they used to see trees, and stories of wild salmon and fuzzy critters disappearing. They don't go to the hatcheries where record levels of salmon are returning every year but not mentioned because hatchery fish don't count. They don't know about it. We need to help them. We need to look like we want to live in a pretty world too, we just have a different way of getting there.

23,708 posted on 09/04/2002 10:24:43 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23684 | View Replies]

To: Bear_in_RoseBear
This rant wont last long Bear... I almost have it out of my system. Please have patience with me. I will be back to normal soon! ;~D
23,709 posted on 09/04/2002 10:26:33 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23694 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
Not until Saturday

Well with any luck they'll postpone the Carolina game. :)

They postponed the Carolina/ State basketball game for Desert Storm. Jeesh! You'd think Bush the Elder could have waited until after the game!

23,710 posted on 09/04/2002 10:27:28 AM PDT by Overtaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23707 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
We are talking to people who see strip malls where they used to see trees, and stories of wild salmon and fuzzy critters disappearing.

The greenies are none too happy with my goldfish bowl...

23,711 posted on 09/04/2002 10:29:38 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23708 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
I have to go now... but I will tell you the possum story when I get back perhaps!
23,712 posted on 09/04/2002 10:31:22 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23684 | View Replies]

To: Overtaxed
Virginia Tech is open this weekend. We're good to go...
23,713 posted on 09/04/2002 10:31:38 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23710 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
No, you are definately part of the problem! ;~D
23,714 posted on 09/04/2002 10:32:13 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23711 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
Virginia Tech is open this weekend. We're good to go...

If they postpone The Race I'll be p....ticked off big time!

23,715 posted on 09/04/2002 10:33:58 AM PDT by Overtaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23713 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
OK, this doesn't have much to do with what you've already said, but while we're in rant mode...

One thing conservatives seem to forget is that basically everyone is out there trying to do what they think is good and right. In order to change behavior, you have to change what people SEE as good and right, and if you start out by calling everything they believe in evil and wrong, more than likely they won't want to even listen to you any more.

Rational arguments work a lot better than childish "you're wrong and I'm right and you're stupid and I'm smart!" ravings.
23,716 posted on 09/04/2002 10:34:30 AM PDT by RosieCotton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23708 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
"We need to look like we want to live in a pretty world too, we just have a different way of getting there"

And our way is going to be a lot more effective, since a free people will not only have more motivation to preserve and take pride in natural beauty, they'll be able to afford it.

But I guess that's your point :-)

23,717 posted on 09/04/2002 10:44:52 AM PDT by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23708 | View Replies]

To: RosieCotton
Very much agree! - That is what I am trying to say too.

Calling people evil, who don't see themselves as evil, makes them walk away, and go tell two friends how weird and wacked we are.
23,718 posted on 09/04/2002 10:49:26 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23716 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
And, to some degree we have a big problem. You will look long and hard in environmental threads here before you find anyone that expresses any love for nature or values anything natural. I think the respect for nature is there, at least I hope it is, but a better way to preserve is not mentioned. Only my right to do whatever I want.

And I should probably state what I believe nature to be. I believe nature is undeveloped spaces, unpaved and unbuilt places, not places devoid of people. I believe in forests as a resource, and nature can be logged and used and planted and logged again. Logged lands are great habitat and most critters can adjust and even thrive in it.

Wild lands don't have to be closed off from people, and in fact shouldn't be. That is why I do agree with public (government) buyout of land to be kept as a public resource. So people can go there and see it. It doesn't have to be untouched by people to be natural. We are natural too.

So I don't mean National Parks, I mean Dept of Natural Resources land. Recreational backwoods that are also a crop owned by the public. The land that I trail ride in is all public land. Well managed forest that has trails, trailhead parking, rustic camping and is open to hikers, bikers, horsemen and hunters. Entirely private ownership of land cannot garuntee that access by the public to any lands they don't personally own. Leaves us kind of less free to roam.

Lots of timber land here is private and I think that is great. But the private lands are gated and closed to the public. Weyerhauser doesn't want the risk or the hassle of public use, with their garbage, their lawsuits and their campfires. I understand that.

As a taxpayer, I am perfectly willing to have my tax dollars go to lands that will be forever kept from development. I don't mind that a bit, but I'll be damned if I want my dollars buying land that Bay and I can't go and see and explore. Nature doesn't mean we can't be there... it means we didn't take it over.

Oh boy.... I was leaving too.... gotta lot of work to do!

< /end rant (again) >
23,719 posted on 09/04/2002 11:12:37 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23717 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
As a taxpayer, I am perfectly willing to have my tax dollars go to lands that will be forever kept from development.

Mind if I yank your chain again? :)

As a taxpayer, I do mind if my money goes to lands that will be forever kept from development. If green groups want that land undeveloped, they should spend their own money and buy it instead of forcing everyone else to buy it for them.

23,720 posted on 09/04/2002 11:33:32 AM PDT by Overtaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23719 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 23,681-23,70023,701-23,72023,721-23,740 ... 48,321-48,323 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson