Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Minneapolis Proposes Requiring A Human Behind The Wheel In Waymos
Jalopnik ^ | SEPT. 13, 2026 | Justin Hughes

Posted on 09/13/2026 10:38:27 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Reception has been mixed as Waymo keeps expanding its robotaxi fleet to more and more cities. Los Angeles seems to have embraced them after a rocky start, while Boston flipped the bird to proposed operations there. Minneapolis has proposed a unique approach, reports Axios: requiring a human monitor behind the wheel at all times.

Waymo is already testing in Minneapolis. As usual for this early phase of deployment, the cars do not transport passengers, and there's a human in the driver's seat, either driving while the car collects data or monitoring its autonomous operation. The proposed rule, called "Workers Drive Minneapolis," would not change how Waymo operates in Minneapolis today, but it could have a dramatic effect on how it transports passengers later.

According to MinneapoliMedia, the proposal would require any autonomous rideshare company to get a license from the city before starting operations. That's pretty standard. What's not so standard is the requirement that a licensed driver must be within immediate reach of the controls at all times. The proposal also requires that driver to be paid at least the applicable minimum wage. From the Minneapolis Star Tribune:

"Workers Drive Minneapolis is about public safety and protecting immigrant workers from losing their jobs to automation," [City Council Member Robin] Wonsley said. "Without it, Minneapolis workers and residents are vulnerable to all the negative impacts of robotaxis without any regulations or accountability mechanisms in place."

Requiring someone in the driver's seat at all times is the antithesis of fully autonomous transportation. Axios reports that Waymo called it "a de facto ban on autonomous vehicles." And Waymo is right. Having to pay human workers behind the wheel a fair wage could disrupt its autonomous business model to the point of not being worth operating in Minneapolis at all.

The human factor

The main driving force behind this, as the name would indicate, is protecting the jobs of human drivers. If an Uber driver could no longer make ends meet after Waymo moves in, they could theoretically go work for Waymo as a robotaxi monitor. And while a robotaxi can get you to your destination, there are many other things it can't do. From Southwest Voices:

"As a driver, I have helped passengers who are intoxicated get home safely, helped elderly passengers with groceries, listened to passengers who are sad and helped make their days better. Robotaxis can't do those things. Having humans in the driver's seat isn't just more safe, it's good for our community," said Abdullahi Abshair, a member of the SEIU Local 26 Rideshare Driver Organizing Committee who has been a rideshare driver for three years.

Safety is certainly an important factor as well, as fully autonomous Waymos have caused their share of issues in other cities. They've jammed up roads, blocked emergency responders, and blown by stopped school buses, even after that problem was supposed to have been fixed. A human driver would not have made many of the strange foul-ups that Waymos have, like casually cruising through the middle of a police felony stop.

There are those, including the IIHS, who say that despite these issues, robotaxis are safer than human drivers. Even if that's true, it doesn't address the issue of human drivers getting displaced from their jobs by machines, which is the main focus of this proposal. It's a unique approach. Other cities have said no to Waymo before. At a public hearing on September 22, Minneapolis may say yes, but only if Waymo preserves these jobs. It would send a message that a simple "no" does not.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Travel
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 09/13/2026 10:38:28 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
"Libs" in MSP are human?

Shirley, you jest.

Who wants that Omar woman driving you crazy around?

2 posted on 09/13/2026 10:49:38 PM PDT by Paladin2 (YMMV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Lookee here. If I’m going to hire a robotic driver vetted by government to navigate roads safely I have no reason to believe it can’t ferry me around on a pub crawl sparing lives I might otherwise have mowed down had I been behind the wheel. Win-Win...unless you’re a government system leaching drunks while ruining their lives, knowing their behavior patterns.

Who’s the villain there?


3 posted on 09/13/2026 10:53:21 PM PDT by MikelTackNailer (Anarchy is a source of enegy until one sees the bigger picture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

This is akin to having a human with a red flag precede by 100 yards one of those newfangled automobiles on a road.


4 posted on 09/14/2026 12:23:56 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Elon won’t be adding human controls to Cybercabs for Luddites in Minneapolis.


5 posted on 09/14/2026 12:25:47 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I’m somewhat surprised that they aren’t proposing that only verified allahu-akbaring muslims be allowed to drive in Minnetosa. That’s probably coming.


6 posted on 09/14/2026 2:07:20 AM PDT by Blennos (This is the official Blennos tagline. Thanks to Big Red Badger. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Makes sense - creating more do-nothing jobs for scumbag Somalis.


7 posted on 09/14/2026 2:12:21 AM PDT by Apparatchik (Русские свиньи, идите домой)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

human monitor behind the wheel at all times.

LOL

The “monitor” might as well just drive the dang things...


8 posted on 09/14/2026 3:04:04 AM PDT by Adder ("A pack of jackasses led by a lion is superior to a pack of lions led by a jackass.” GW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

They should probably just ban self driving cars all together at that point.


9 posted on 09/14/2026 3:33:42 AM PDT by escapefromboston (Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; escapefromboston

Last year my city in it’s infinite wisdom decided to invest in autonomous taxi vans to service downtown...which no one uses BTW.

At the recommendation of the manufacturer the suggestion was made to put a human behind the wheel “just in case”. Sort of defeats the purpose doesn’t it? So freakin’ stupid.

Recently one of ‘em malfunctioned and ran into a light pole. So even having a driver behind the wheel wheel didn’t work.

Now, 5.5 million dollars later the city again in it’s infinite wisdom has decided to shut down the program.

WAYMO’s are always malfunctioning, I saw a story recently where one of ‘em drove into a lake.

I doubt I’ll ever get in one....and if one ever runs into me I plan to sue SOMEBODY bigly.


10 posted on 09/14/2026 5:27:24 AM PDT by V_TWIN (America....so great even the people that hate it won't leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blennos

That might be making a bad situation worse.


11 posted on 09/14/2026 5:33:11 AM PDT by oldtech (oltech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Just like the areas limiting how many self checkouts a supermarket can have without human oversight.


12 posted on 09/14/2026 5:40:01 AM PDT by tlozo (“Russia war-Either money today or blood tomorrow," Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldtech

SF Bay Area BART. It was designed to operate the same way. Someone decided they needed a driver to stop the train in case someone decided to jump in front of one.


13 posted on 09/14/2026 5:40:43 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
"As a driver, I have helped passengers who are intoxicated get home safely, helped elderly passengers with groceries, listened to passengers who are sad and helped make their days better. Robotaxis can't do those things. Having humans in the driver's seat isn't just more safe, it's good for our community," said Abdullahi Abshair, a member of the SEIU Local 26 Rideshare Driver Organizing Committee

As a consumer, I want a choice of whether I have to smell Abdullahi during my ride, or not.

14 posted on 09/14/2026 6:01:44 AM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Good luck


15 posted on 09/14/2026 6:02:44 AM PDT by Vaduz (NEVER TRUST A DEMOCRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlozo
Just like the areas limiting how many self checkouts a supermarket can have without human oversight.

For totally different reasons.

16 posted on 09/14/2026 6:23:09 AM PDT by TangoLimaSierra (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits
This charade is cute. There are already human operators for Waymo cars. Unlicensed operators, possibly even minors, drive Waymo cars remotely from the Philippines.

"Waymo Exec Admits Remote Operators in Philippines Help Guide U.S. Robotaxis"

https://eletric-vehicles.com/waymo/waymo-exec-admits-remote-operators-in-philippines-help-guide-us-robotaxis/

17 posted on 09/14/2026 6:26:43 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikelTackNailer

Wednesday, me and my 19 year old grandson was in Santa Monica. a few blocks from the beach off Wilshire. Waymos beside us a few times then we stopped at Taco Bell so he could eat. Almost got ran over by coco’s (robot deliveries for food) while there. He looked at me and said....can we please get out of this crazy place? lol


18 posted on 09/14/2026 7:49:18 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Should be fun in the snow and ice.


19 posted on 09/14/2026 8:04:45 AM PDT by VTenigma (Conspiracy theory is the new "spoiler alert")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Nope!

They don’t want to see a Somali uber driver without a job.


20 posted on 09/14/2026 8:53:25 AM PDT by cableguymn (Can't cancel all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson