Posted on 09/10/2026 6:04:07 AM PDT by Red Badger
With 9/11 approaching, I am re-running this report that you may have missed.
Well, I did not expect to see this today!
New 9/11 footage has just been released, more than 23 years after the infamous day in 2001.
New footage of 9/11 has surfaced 23 years after the attack. This footage was uploaded by Kei Sugimoto, this video shows angles of the collapse of The World Trade Center that have never been seen before.
The angles shown in this video haven’t been seen before especially explosions during the falling of the towers.
This is the only known footage of the collapse that wasn’t filmed from South or East of the towers.
The new footage will no doubt be studied and scrubbed for years to come.
Do you notice anything different immediately?
FULL VIDEO PLAYER HERE:
VIDEO AT LINK....................
(Excerpt) Read more at 100percentfedup.com ...
“This whole “it was an inside job” stuff belongs on the same shelf as “we did not go to the moon” bull-crap.”
And if you think those kinds of steel columns can liquify and drop to earth like a sheet of water then you are full of bull-crap.
So if it was an inside job, terrorists must of done a lot of inside work-laying charges etc. As if that could happen in those buildings-I would bet that any work done would have been done by members of some craft union, i.e. plumbers, electricians, etc. If some non-union individual, started to unscrew a panel, the union involved would put up a picket line around the World Trade Center.
All that inside work by strangers would not have gone unnoticed by union workers, facilities managers, and so forth. Since there were no grievances filed, no picket lines established, it suggests that an inside job did not happen.
now do building 7
Time for UFO photographs?
And 25 years later the people who cheered when the buildings collapsed are living in Gracie mansion and will soon be representing NYC in Congress.
A plane did hit the Empire State Building. I believe it was a B17 or B24. The building is still there.
Also, NY demanded all the asbestos be stripped off the superstructure a few years earlier. The asbestos may not have saved the buildings, but it may have delayed the collapse saving lives of people in the buildings. Actions have consequences.
And she wonders why no one likes her anymore.
We all know the government would never ever ever ever lie to us. Ha ha ha..
“Also, NY demanded all the asbestos be stripped off the superstructure a few years earlier”
Asbestos dust is indeed cancer-causing, but wouldn’t it have made more sense to spray on a covering to keep the dust contained?
Geez, stripping it must have been expensive with a lot of effort to contain dust.
this has been around for a while...
All over TS yesterday was the crap about there were no planes etc.
And, that is because the PortAuthority was allowed to construct a fatally designed building — unlike any other in NYC.
It was designed so that its structural support was on the outside, where it is most vulnerable. Like a tin can. Smack that can and air puffs out.
That is why AlQuida chose that building, they knew it was crappola.
“Any thoughts on Building 7?”
https://scienceinsights.org/why-world-trade-center-7-collapsed-fire-and-steel-failure/
Bkmk towers
Bkmk towers
“””””I happen to think that they had not only a plane but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously”””””
I didn’t know that Trump thinks bombs were used.
Well, neither of us are going to figure out or solve it here...on an obscure internet site.
I will spend the next few days remembering the events as I saw them; experienced them; and remember the friends who had their lives completely uprooted over the following 22 years. I will remember the classmates who died because they were in a stupid war in a stupid place.
I will remember those things so I can pass on some wisdom to my grandkids about how you cannot trust your government to get much of anything right.
You do you.
The funny thing is we probably both end up in the same place on what comes next.
“All fire has to do is get the rivets and bolts hot enough to draw the temper and down she comes.”
This is what I argue with skeptics. The fire wasn’t hot enough to melt the steel, BUT it WAS hot enough to push the steel into it’s plastic deformation stage. Thermal softening caused the steel to lose much of it’s strength. I am certainly not a metallurgist, but I was able to look this up on the web in about 5 minutes.
CC
I managed a lot of asbestos abatement projects over the years and yes, it is involved and expensive. And honestly if it was on the girders and superstructure, it was probably not exposed to the people in the building.
Surprised me. I figured they would survive as the Empire State Building did when hit in the 1940s.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.